跨项目缺陷预测方法在跨公司工作量估算中的应用

S. Amasaki, Tomoyuki Yokogawa, Hirohisa Aman
{"title":"跨项目缺陷预测方法在跨公司工作量估算中的应用","authors":"S. Amasaki, Tomoyuki Yokogawa, Hirohisa Aman","doi":"10.1145/3345629.3345638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Prediction systems in software engineering often suffer from the shortage of suitable data within a project. A promising solution is transfer learning that utilizes data from outside the project. Many transfer learning approaches have been proposed for defect prediction known as cross-project defect prediction (CPDP). In contrast, a few approaches have been proposed for software effort estimation known as cross-company software effort estimation (CCSEE). Both CCSEE and CPDP are engaged in a similar problem, and a few CPDP approaches are applicable as CCSEE in actual. It is thus beneficial for improving CCSEE performance to examine how well CPDP approaches can perform as CCSEE approaches. AIMS: To explore how well CPDP approaches work as CCSEE approaches. METHOD: An empirical experiment was conducted for evaluating the performance of CPDP approaches in CCSEE. We examined 7 CPDP approaches which were selected due to the easiness of application. Those approaches were applied to 8 data sets, each of which consists of a few subsets from different domains. The estimation results were evaluated with a common performance measure called SA. RESULTS: there were several CPDP approaches which could improve the estimation accuracy though the degree of improvement was not large. CONCLUSIONS: A straight forward application of selected CPDP approaches did not bring a clear effect. CCSEE may need specific transfer learning approaches for more improvement.","PeriodicalId":424201,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Cross Project Defect Prediction Approaches to Cross-Company Effort Estimation\",\"authors\":\"S. Amasaki, Tomoyuki Yokogawa, Hirohisa Aman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3345629.3345638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Prediction systems in software engineering often suffer from the shortage of suitable data within a project. A promising solution is transfer learning that utilizes data from outside the project. Many transfer learning approaches have been proposed for defect prediction known as cross-project defect prediction (CPDP). In contrast, a few approaches have been proposed for software effort estimation known as cross-company software effort estimation (CCSEE). Both CCSEE and CPDP are engaged in a similar problem, and a few CPDP approaches are applicable as CCSEE in actual. It is thus beneficial for improving CCSEE performance to examine how well CPDP approaches can perform as CCSEE approaches. AIMS: To explore how well CPDP approaches work as CCSEE approaches. METHOD: An empirical experiment was conducted for evaluating the performance of CPDP approaches in CCSEE. We examined 7 CPDP approaches which were selected due to the easiness of application. Those approaches were applied to 8 data sets, each of which consists of a few subsets from different domains. The estimation results were evaluated with a common performance measure called SA. RESULTS: there were several CPDP approaches which could improve the estimation accuracy though the degree of improvement was not large. CONCLUSIONS: A straight forward application of selected CPDP approaches did not bring a clear effect. CCSEE may need specific transfer learning approaches for more improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:软件工程中的预测系统经常受到项目中缺乏合适数据的困扰。一个很有前途的解决方案是利用项目外部数据的迁移学习。许多迁移学习方法被提出用于缺陷预测,称为跨项目缺陷预测(CPDP)。相反,已经提出了一些方法用于软件工作量估算,称为跨公司软件工作量估算(CCSEE)。CCSEE和CPDP都面临着类似的问题,CPDP的一些方法在实际中适用于CCSEE。因此,研究CPDP方法作为CCSEE方法的表现如何,有助于提高CCSEE的性能。目的:探讨CPDP方法与CCSEE方法的效果。方法:通过实证实验对CCSEE中CPDP方法的性能进行评价。我们检查了7种CPDP方法,这些方法是由于易于应用而选择的。这些方法应用于8个数据集,每个数据集由来自不同领域的几个子集组成。使用称为SA的常见性能度量来评估评估结果。结果:几种CPDP方法均能提高估计精度,但提高程度不大。结论:直接应用选定的CPDP方法并没有带来明显的效果。CCSEE可能需要特定的迁移学习方法来进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying Cross Project Defect Prediction Approaches to Cross-Company Effort Estimation
BACKGROUND: Prediction systems in software engineering often suffer from the shortage of suitable data within a project. A promising solution is transfer learning that utilizes data from outside the project. Many transfer learning approaches have been proposed for defect prediction known as cross-project defect prediction (CPDP). In contrast, a few approaches have been proposed for software effort estimation known as cross-company software effort estimation (CCSEE). Both CCSEE and CPDP are engaged in a similar problem, and a few CPDP approaches are applicable as CCSEE in actual. It is thus beneficial for improving CCSEE performance to examine how well CPDP approaches can perform as CCSEE approaches. AIMS: To explore how well CPDP approaches work as CCSEE approaches. METHOD: An empirical experiment was conducted for evaluating the performance of CPDP approaches in CCSEE. We examined 7 CPDP approaches which were selected due to the easiness of application. Those approaches were applied to 8 data sets, each of which consists of a few subsets from different domains. The estimation results were evaluated with a common performance measure called SA. RESULTS: there were several CPDP approaches which could improve the estimation accuracy though the degree of improvement was not large. CONCLUSIONS: A straight forward application of selected CPDP approaches did not bring a clear effect. CCSEE may need specific transfer learning approaches for more improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering An Evaluation of Parameter Pruning Approaches for Software Estimation Which Refactoring Reduces Bug Rate? Reviewer Recommendation using Software Artifact Traceability Graphs Prioritizing automated user interface tests using reinforcement learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1