M. V. Opijnen, M. Palmirani, F. Vitali, John Van Den Oever, T. Agnoloni
{"title":"迈向ECLI 2.0","authors":"M. V. Opijnen, M. Palmirani, F. Vitali, John Van Den Oever, T. Agnoloni","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) was established in 2010. It has been implemented by three European courts and (partly or in full) by twelve Member States, while eight Member States are preparing an implementation. During these implementations various issues concerning the format, metadata and the architecture of ECLI have surfaced, while in the meantime technological insights have progressed. To improve the accessibility of current and future case law repositories an ECLI 2.0 needs to be considered. Given the implementations realized, backwards compatibility is an absolute prerequisite. In this paper the various issues and possible solutions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":240391,"journal":{"name":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards ECLI 2.0\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Opijnen, M. Palmirani, F. Vitali, John Van Den Oever, T. Agnoloni\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2017.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) was established in 2010. It has been implemented by three European courts and (partly or in full) by twelve Member States, while eight Member States are preparing an implementation. During these implementations various issues concerning the format, metadata and the architecture of ECLI have surfaced, while in the meantime technological insights have progressed. To improve the accessibility of current and future case law repositories an ECLI 2.0 needs to be considered. Given the implementations realized, backwards compatibility is an absolute prerequisite. In this paper the various issues and possible solutions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) was established in 2010. It has been implemented by three European courts and (partly or in full) by twelve Member States, while eight Member States are preparing an implementation. During these implementations various issues concerning the format, metadata and the architecture of ECLI have surfaced, while in the meantime technological insights have progressed. To improve the accessibility of current and future case law repositories an ECLI 2.0 needs to be considered. Given the implementations realized, backwards compatibility is an absolute prerequisite. In this paper the various issues and possible solutions are discussed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
