传统高等教育中的远程学习:对巴西立法和管理专业学生利益意愿和感知的反思

A. Ramos, C. Munhoz, Marcileide Muniz Cavalcanti de Melo Silva
{"title":"传统高等教育中的远程学习:对巴西立法和管理专业学生利益意愿和感知的反思","authors":"A. Ramos, C. Munhoz, Marcileide Muniz Cavalcanti de Melo Silva","doi":"10.33965/ama2020_202003p023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to verify the willingness and the perception of benefits to the formation from the perspective of the students of the superior management courses, traditional modality, to attend curricular units in the distance learning - DL. The resistance of students in face-to-face courses to the proposition of distance learning units naturally occurs because students chose to study in the traditional mode. However, Brazilian law has encouraged the inclusion of distance learning units in face-to-face courses, allowing up to 40% of the workload to be integrated at a distance. The methodology is exploratory from the perspective of the survey of the Brazilian legislation that supports the expansion of the integration of the workload taught at a distance in face-to-face courses and also quantitative considering the results of a instrument, measured on the Likert scale, applied to 100 students in face-to-face courses at three different Universities. In the management area, in Higher Education Institutions - HEI with administrative characteristics and different levels of distance content insertion. The work shows that students have less resistance to distance learning, when the HEI have already consolidated the inclusion of distance learning in traditional courses. Students also point to a scenario in which distance learning can offer benefits to their education and learning. The work to verify that depending on the phase or level of insertion of DL in the Institutions, student resistance may be reduced and the benefits may be better realized.","PeriodicalId":263215,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISTANCE LEARNING IN TRADITIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION: A REFLECTION ON BRAZILIAN LEGISLATION AND THE WILLINGNESS AND PERCEPTION OF BENEFITS OF MANAGEMENT STUDENTS\",\"authors\":\"A. Ramos, C. Munhoz, Marcileide Muniz Cavalcanti de Melo Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/ama2020_202003p023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work aims to verify the willingness and the perception of benefits to the formation from the perspective of the students of the superior management courses, traditional modality, to attend curricular units in the distance learning - DL. The resistance of students in face-to-face courses to the proposition of distance learning units naturally occurs because students chose to study in the traditional mode. However, Brazilian law has encouraged the inclusion of distance learning units in face-to-face courses, allowing up to 40% of the workload to be integrated at a distance. The methodology is exploratory from the perspective of the survey of the Brazilian legislation that supports the expansion of the integration of the workload taught at a distance in face-to-face courses and also quantitative considering the results of a instrument, measured on the Likert scale, applied to 100 students in face-to-face courses at three different Universities. In the management area, in Higher Education Institutions - HEI with administrative characteristics and different levels of distance content insertion. The work shows that students have less resistance to distance learning, when the HEI have already consolidated the inclusion of distance learning in traditional courses. Students also point to a scenario in which distance learning can offer benefits to their education and learning. The work to verify that depending on the phase or level of insertion of DL in the Institutions, student resistance may be reduced and the benefits may be better realized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003p023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003p023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从传统模式的高级管理课程的学生的角度,验证远程学习课程单元的意愿和利益感知的形成。由于学生选择了传统的学习模式,面对面课程的学生对远程学习单元的命题产生了抵制。然而,巴西法律鼓励将远程学习单元纳入面对面课程,允许多达40%的工作量在远程整合。从巴西立法调查的角度来看,该方法是探索性的,该调查支持扩大面对面课程中远程教学工作量的整合,并定量考虑了一种工具的结果,用李克特量表测量,应用于三所不同大学面对面课程的100名学生。在管理领域,在高等教育机构-高等学校具有行政特色和不同层次的远程内容插入。研究表明,当高等教育机构已经将远程学习纳入传统课程时,学生对远程学习的抵抗力就会降低。学生们还指出,远程学习可以为他们的教育和学习带来好处。这项工作是为了验证,根据在院校引入深度学习的阶段或水平,学生的阻力可能会减少,好处可能会更好地实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DISTANCE LEARNING IN TRADITIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION: A REFLECTION ON BRAZILIAN LEGISLATION AND THE WILLINGNESS AND PERCEPTION OF BENEFITS OF MANAGEMENT STUDENTS
The present work aims to verify the willingness and the perception of benefits to the formation from the perspective of the students of the superior management courses, traditional modality, to attend curricular units in the distance learning - DL. The resistance of students in face-to-face courses to the proposition of distance learning units naturally occurs because students chose to study in the traditional mode. However, Brazilian law has encouraged the inclusion of distance learning units in face-to-face courses, allowing up to 40% of the workload to be integrated at a distance. The methodology is exploratory from the perspective of the survey of the Brazilian legislation that supports the expansion of the integration of the workload taught at a distance in face-to-face courses and also quantitative considering the results of a instrument, measured on the Likert scale, applied to 100 students in face-to-face courses at three different Universities. In the management area, in Higher Education Institutions - HEI with administrative characteristics and different levels of distance content insertion. The work shows that students have less resistance to distance learning, when the HEI have already consolidated the inclusion of distance learning in traditional courses. Students also point to a scenario in which distance learning can offer benefits to their education and learning. The work to verify that depending on the phase or level of insertion of DL in the Institutions, student resistance may be reduced and the benefits may be better realized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND INNOVATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN BRAZILIAN COMPANIES ARE CRYPTOCURRENCIES UNBIASED? THE CASE OF BITCOIN IN BRAZIL INNOVATION PRACTICES THROUGH KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS: PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION IN THE BRAZILIAN NAVY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES: ANALYSIS OF CONTEXT AND THE IMPLICATION IN THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS THE INFLUENCE OF A POSTGRADUATE COURSE IN UNDERTAKING AS A CAREER OPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1