俄罗斯的开放科学或科学创造力的实施

V. Rakin
{"title":"俄罗斯的开放科学或科学创造力的实施","authors":"V. Rakin","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The executive power of our country, by the statement of Deputy Prime Minister D. Chernyshenko on March 7, 2022, recognized that the current system of management of domestic science does not meet the national interests of Russia. The concept of open science implies not only open access to the latest achievements of world science, which can be achieved with the development of modern means of communication, but also the fulfillment of a number of principles of honest scientific research. One can agree that easy access to theresults of domestic scientific research may be contrary to the national interest of the country. But this problem is probably quite solvable through scientific and technological expertise at the stage of preparing material for publication. The main problem, in our opinion, is related to the fact that numerous scientometric indicators of “successful” scientific work transform the creative research process into an operational type of intellectual activity. In our opinion, the problem of the examination of a scientist’s scientific activity should be reconsidered. The purpose of expertise should be to assess the quality of scientific work: the personal contribution to the scientific problem being developed; reliability and sufficiency of the data obtained andfor the conclusions formulated; reproducibility of observation results; absence of plagiarism and duplication of publications; depth of understanding of the scientific problem; degree of involvement of the researcher in the creative work of the whole scientific team within a given scientific or technological topic. Only examination of the attitude to creative scientific work within the framework of periodic certification process can prevent domestic science from becoming just a means of earning money.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Science in Russia or the Enforcement of Scientific Creativity\",\"authors\":\"V. Rakin\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The executive power of our country, by the statement of Deputy Prime Minister D. Chernyshenko on March 7, 2022, recognized that the current system of management of domestic science does not meet the national interests of Russia. The concept of open science implies not only open access to the latest achievements of world science, which can be achieved with the development of modern means of communication, but also the fulfillment of a number of principles of honest scientific research. One can agree that easy access to theresults of domestic scientific research may be contrary to the national interest of the country. But this problem is probably quite solvable through scientific and technological expertise at the stage of preparing material for publication. The main problem, in our opinion, is related to the fact that numerous scientometric indicators of “successful” scientific work transform the creative research process into an operational type of intellectual activity. In our opinion, the problem of the examination of a scientist’s scientific activity should be reconsidered. The purpose of expertise should be to assess the quality of scientific work: the personal contribution to the scientific problem being developed; reliability and sufficiency of the data obtained andfor the conclusions formulated; reproducibility of observation results; absence of plagiarism and duplication of publications; depth of understanding of the scientific problem; degree of involvement of the researcher in the creative work of the whole scientific team within a given scientific or technological topic. Only examination of the attitude to creative scientific work within the framework of periodic certification process can prevent domestic science from becoming just a means of earning money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据副总理切尔尼申科在2022年3月7日发表的声明,我国行政当局承认,目前的国内科学管理体制不符合俄罗斯的国家利益。开放科学的概念不仅意味着开放获取世界科学的最新成果,这可以通过现代通信手段的发展来实现,而且还意味着实现一些诚实的科学研究原则。人们可以同意,容易获得国内科学研究的结果可能与国家的国家利益背道而驰。但是,在准备出版材料的阶段,通过科学和技术知识,这个问题可能完全可以解决。在我们看来,主要的问题与“成功的”科学工作的许多科学计量指标将创造性的研究过程转变为一种操作性的智力活动有关。在我们看来,审查科学家的科学活动的问题应该重新考虑。专业知识的目的应该是评估科学工作的质量:个人对正在发展的科学问题的贡献;获得的数据和得出的结论的可靠性和充分性;观察结果的可重复性;没有抄袭和复制出版物;对科学问题理解的深度;在给定的科学或技术主题中,研究人员参与整个科学团队创造性工作的程度。只有在定期认证程序的框架内检查对创造性科学工作的态度,才能防止国内科学成为一种赚钱的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Science in Russia or the Enforcement of Scientific Creativity
The executive power of our country, by the statement of Deputy Prime Minister D. Chernyshenko on March 7, 2022, recognized that the current system of management of domestic science does not meet the national interests of Russia. The concept of open science implies not only open access to the latest achievements of world science, which can be achieved with the development of modern means of communication, but also the fulfillment of a number of principles of honest scientific research. One can agree that easy access to theresults of domestic scientific research may be contrary to the national interest of the country. But this problem is probably quite solvable through scientific and technological expertise at the stage of preparing material for publication. The main problem, in our opinion, is related to the fact that numerous scientometric indicators of “successful” scientific work transform the creative research process into an operational type of intellectual activity. In our opinion, the problem of the examination of a scientist’s scientific activity should be reconsidered. The purpose of expertise should be to assess the quality of scientific work: the personal contribution to the scientific problem being developed; reliability and sufficiency of the data obtained andfor the conclusions formulated; reproducibility of observation results; absence of plagiarism and duplication of publications; depth of understanding of the scientific problem; degree of involvement of the researcher in the creative work of the whole scientific team within a given scientific or technological topic. Only examination of the attitude to creative scientific work within the framework of periodic certification process can prevent domestic science from becoming just a means of earning money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1