基于熵权指标体系量化的高等教育健康水平研究

Xiu-lan Ma
{"title":"基于熵权指标体系量化的高等教育健康水平研究","authors":"Xiu-lan Ma","doi":"10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diversity in higher education system calls for a reliable way to evaluate the health and sustainability of those systems. First of all, this paper quantifies the indicators to evaluate the health of the higher education system from three different dimensions: equity, resource access and cost-effectiveness. For the equity dimension, we designed public/private equity scores, gender equity scores and registration levels to capture different aspects of unfairness. At the same time, we use the entropy method to set the weight for each index and generate the weighted average score and equity score. In addition, we design the Wealth Equity Index (WEI) as a supplementary index. For the dimension of resource access, we use per capita accessibility index to capture the richness of higher education resources. For the cost-effective dimension, we first use a fixed-effect model to test the correlation between \"output\" and \"input\". Then we designed the average higher education output to weigh the benefits of higher education.","PeriodicalId":293852,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of New Developments in Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the Health level of higher Education based on the quantification of Entropy weight Index system\",\"authors\":\"Xiu-lan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diversity in higher education system calls for a reliable way to evaluate the health and sustainability of those systems. First of all, this paper quantifies the indicators to evaluate the health of the higher education system from three different dimensions: equity, resource access and cost-effectiveness. For the equity dimension, we designed public/private equity scores, gender equity scores and registration levels to capture different aspects of unfairness. At the same time, we use the entropy method to set the weight for each index and generate the weighted average score and equity score. In addition, we design the Wealth Equity Index (WEI) as a supplementary index. For the dimension of resource access, we use per capita accessibility index to capture the richness of higher education resources. For the cost-effective dimension, we first use a fixed-effect model to test the correlation between \\\"output\\\" and \\\"input\\\". Then we designed the average higher education output to weigh the benefits of higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of New Developments in Education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of New Developments in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of New Developments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育系统的多样性需要一种可靠的方法来评估这些系统的健康和可持续性。首先,本文从公平、资源可及性和成本效益三个维度对评价高等教育系统健康的指标进行了量化。对于公平维度,我们设计了公共/私募股权得分、性别平等得分和注册水平,以捕捉不公平的不同方面。同时,利用熵值法对各指标进行权重设置,生成加权平均分和公平分。此外,我们设计了财富权益指数(Wealth Equity Index, WEI)作为补充指标。在资源可及性维度上,我们使用人均可及性指数来反映高等教育资源的丰富程度。对于成本效益维度,我们首先使用固定效应模型来检验“产出”和“投入”之间的相关性。然后,我们设计了高等教育平均产出来衡量高等教育的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on the Health level of higher Education based on the quantification of Entropy weight Index system
The diversity in higher education system calls for a reliable way to evaluate the health and sustainability of those systems. First of all, this paper quantifies the indicators to evaluate the health of the higher education system from three different dimensions: equity, resource access and cost-effectiveness. For the equity dimension, we designed public/private equity scores, gender equity scores and registration levels to capture different aspects of unfairness. At the same time, we use the entropy method to set the weight for each index and generate the weighted average score and equity score. In addition, we design the Wealth Equity Index (WEI) as a supplementary index. For the dimension of resource access, we use per capita accessibility index to capture the richness of higher education resources. For the cost-effective dimension, we first use a fixed-effect model to test the correlation between "output" and "input". Then we designed the average higher education output to weigh the benefits of higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of innovative and entrepreneurship Teaching Mode in Application-oriented Universities School-enterprise cooperation, innovation, entrepreneurial education management model Research on English Flipped Classroom in Higher Vocational Colleges Based on OBE Concept Tightened Regulations on Education Industry in China: Reasons, Challenges, and Solutions A Comparative Study of Chinese, American and European Foreign Language Education Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1