几种参数和非参数分类方法的评价与分析

M. S. Sonawane, C. Dhawale
{"title":"几种参数和非参数分类方法的评价与分析","authors":"M. S. Sonawane, C. Dhawale","doi":"10.1109/CICT.2016.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image processing is one of most popular research area. Image processing consists of a number of phases to be carried out, among which classification is one. Classification of an object is a vital job in computer vision area. Classification reflects the final results accuracies. So everyone has to pay attention at this phase. Lots of work is done on comparative learning of classification methods. This survey paper demonstrates study of parametric and non-parametric classification techniques. Study isolates parametric and nonparametric classification techniques which are employed in classification phase and offers tree depictions of such methods. For comparative study 9 classifiers are utilized among which 6 belongs to parametric category and remaining 3 belongs to non-parametric category.9 classifiers considered here are super simple, their interpretation is nice probabilistic, used mostly and well known. Assessment parameters considered are Kappa Statistic, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Receiver Operating Characteristics Area (ROC Area) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). For validation test 10 cross fold method is considered. Results show that overall Decision Tree classifier or subtypes of decision tree classifier performs well. It gives better output to high values of Kappa Statistic and ROC Area measures. Also, it produces better results with less value of MAE and RMSE measures. The results produced by Bayesian Net, Naive Bayes techniques are similar.","PeriodicalId":118509,"journal":{"name":"2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Analysis of Few Parametric and Nonparametric Classification Methods\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Sonawane, C. Dhawale\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CICT.2016.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image processing is one of most popular research area. Image processing consists of a number of phases to be carried out, among which classification is one. Classification of an object is a vital job in computer vision area. Classification reflects the final results accuracies. So everyone has to pay attention at this phase. Lots of work is done on comparative learning of classification methods. This survey paper demonstrates study of parametric and non-parametric classification techniques. Study isolates parametric and nonparametric classification techniques which are employed in classification phase and offers tree depictions of such methods. For comparative study 9 classifiers are utilized among which 6 belongs to parametric category and remaining 3 belongs to non-parametric category.9 classifiers considered here are super simple, their interpretation is nice probabilistic, used mostly and well known. Assessment parameters considered are Kappa Statistic, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Receiver Operating Characteristics Area (ROC Area) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). For validation test 10 cross fold method is considered. Results show that overall Decision Tree classifier or subtypes of decision tree classifier performs well. It gives better output to high values of Kappa Statistic and ROC Area measures. Also, it produces better results with less value of MAE and RMSE measures. The results produced by Bayesian Net, Naive Bayes techniques are similar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT.2016.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT.2016.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

图像处理是目前最热门的研究领域之一。图像处理包括许多要进行的阶段,分类是其中一个阶段。物体分类是计算机视觉领域的一项重要工作。分类反映了最终结果的准确性。所以每个人都要注意这个阶段。在分类方法的比较学习方面做了大量的工作。本文对参数和非参数分类技术进行了研究。研究分离了在分类阶段使用的参数和非参数分类技术,并对这些方法进行了树状描述。对比研究使用了9个分类器,其中6个属于参数类,其余3个属于非参数类。这里考虑的9个分类器非常简单,它们的解释是很好的概率,使用得最多,也很有名。评估参数包括Kappa统计量、平均绝对误差(MAE)、受试者工作特征面积(ROC Area)和均方根误差(RMSE)。为了验证试验,考虑了10交叉折叠方法。结果表明,总体决策树分类器或子类型决策树分类器表现良好。Kappa统计值和ROC面积测量值越高,输出越好。在MAE和RMSE测量值较小的情况下,可以得到更好的结果。贝叶斯网络和朴素贝叶斯技术产生的结果是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation and Analysis of Few Parametric and Nonparametric Classification Methods
Image processing is one of most popular research area. Image processing consists of a number of phases to be carried out, among which classification is one. Classification of an object is a vital job in computer vision area. Classification reflects the final results accuracies. So everyone has to pay attention at this phase. Lots of work is done on comparative learning of classification methods. This survey paper demonstrates study of parametric and non-parametric classification techniques. Study isolates parametric and nonparametric classification techniques which are employed in classification phase and offers tree depictions of such methods. For comparative study 9 classifiers are utilized among which 6 belongs to parametric category and remaining 3 belongs to non-parametric category.9 classifiers considered here are super simple, their interpretation is nice probabilistic, used mostly and well known. Assessment parameters considered are Kappa Statistic, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Receiver Operating Characteristics Area (ROC Area) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). For validation test 10 cross fold method is considered. Results show that overall Decision Tree classifier or subtypes of decision tree classifier performs well. It gives better output to high values of Kappa Statistic and ROC Area measures. Also, it produces better results with less value of MAE and RMSE measures. The results produced by Bayesian Net, Naive Bayes techniques are similar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sketch Based Image Retrieval Using Watershed Transformation Modified ZRP to Identify Cooperative Attacks Short Term Load Forecasting Using ANN and Multiple Linear Regression Prediction of Carbon Stock Available in Forest Using Naive Bayes Approach CAD for the Detection of Fetal Electrocardiogram through Neuro-Fuzzy Logic and Wavelets Systems for Telemetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1