研究生管理课程的学习转移

Patrícia Teixeira Maggi-da-Silva, D. Bido
{"title":"研究生管理课程的学习转移","authors":"Patrícia Teixeira Maggi-da-Silva, D. Bido","doi":"10.33965/ama2020_202003l002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an increased recognition by the organizations of the need to analyze the results of investments in different types of formal learning. By investing in formal learning, organizations need to assess whether individuals are transferring what they have learned through behavioral changes at work. However, they don’t know how to do so, leading to the problem or gap of learning transfer. In addition, there is a need to better define and operationalize the construct learning transfer and present the differences between transfer as use and as efficiency. Although, there is an increase number of academic research on learning transfer, there is a scarcity of studies including long-term courses offered by higher education institutions. In this study we developed and tested a comprehensive model of transfer of learning in a context of postgraduate management programmes. Based on the taxonomy of use proposed by Yelon et al. (2014), we operationalized the dependent variable transfer as use as a second order latent variable with five dimensions. The model also includes five independent variables: transfer design, critical reflection, organizational cynicism, job autonomy and learning culture. We tested the hypotheses with a sample of 424 students and graduates of postgraduate management programmes in Brazil. Data were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate techniques, including correlations, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for hypothesis testing. The results confirmed three of the five hypotheses that predicted direct relationships with the dependent variable: critical reflection, transfer design and learning culture.","PeriodicalId":263215,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN POSTGRADUATE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Teixeira Maggi-da-Silva, D. Bido\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/ama2020_202003l002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is an increased recognition by the organizations of the need to analyze the results of investments in different types of formal learning. By investing in formal learning, organizations need to assess whether individuals are transferring what they have learned through behavioral changes at work. However, they don’t know how to do so, leading to the problem or gap of learning transfer. In addition, there is a need to better define and operationalize the construct learning transfer and present the differences between transfer as use and as efficiency. Although, there is an increase number of academic research on learning transfer, there is a scarcity of studies including long-term courses offered by higher education institutions. In this study we developed and tested a comprehensive model of transfer of learning in a context of postgraduate management programmes. Based on the taxonomy of use proposed by Yelon et al. (2014), we operationalized the dependent variable transfer as use as a second order latent variable with five dimensions. The model also includes five independent variables: transfer design, critical reflection, organizational cynicism, job autonomy and learning culture. We tested the hypotheses with a sample of 424 students and graduates of postgraduate management programmes in Brazil. Data were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate techniques, including correlations, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for hypothesis testing. The results confirmed three of the five hypotheses that predicted direct relationships with the dependent variable: critical reflection, transfer design and learning culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003l002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003l002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各组织越来越认识到有必要分析对不同类型的正式学习的投资结果。通过投资于正式学习,组织需要评估个人是否通过工作中的行为改变转移了他们所学到的知识。然而,他们不知道如何做到这一点,导致了学习迁移的问题或差距。此外,有必要更好地定义和操作学习迁移的结构,并提出迁移作为使用和效率之间的差异。尽管对学习迁移的学术研究越来越多,但包括高等教育机构开设的长期课程在内的研究却很少。在这项研究中,我们在研究生管理课程的背景下开发并测试了一个全面的学习转移模型。基于Yelon等人(2014)提出的使用分类,我们将因变量转移作为五个维度的二阶潜在变量进行操作。该模型还包括五个自变量:迁移设计、批判性反思、组织犬儒主义、工作自主性和学习文化。我们以巴西424名研究生管理课程的学生和毕业生为样本,对这些假设进行了检验。将数据提交给描述性统计分析和多变量技术,包括相关性、验证性因子分析(CFA)和结构方程模型(SEM)进行假设检验。结果证实了预测与因变量直接相关的五个假设中的三个:批判性反思、迁移设计和学习文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN POSTGRADUATE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES
There is an increased recognition by the organizations of the need to analyze the results of investments in different types of formal learning. By investing in formal learning, organizations need to assess whether individuals are transferring what they have learned through behavioral changes at work. However, they don’t know how to do so, leading to the problem or gap of learning transfer. In addition, there is a need to better define and operationalize the construct learning transfer and present the differences between transfer as use and as efficiency. Although, there is an increase number of academic research on learning transfer, there is a scarcity of studies including long-term courses offered by higher education institutions. In this study we developed and tested a comprehensive model of transfer of learning in a context of postgraduate management programmes. Based on the taxonomy of use proposed by Yelon et al. (2014), we operationalized the dependent variable transfer as use as a second order latent variable with five dimensions. The model also includes five independent variables: transfer design, critical reflection, organizational cynicism, job autonomy and learning culture. We tested the hypotheses with a sample of 424 students and graduates of postgraduate management programmes in Brazil. Data were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate techniques, including correlations, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for hypothesis testing. The results confirmed three of the five hypotheses that predicted direct relationships with the dependent variable: critical reflection, transfer design and learning culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND INNOVATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN BRAZILIAN COMPANIES ARE CRYPTOCURRENCIES UNBIASED? THE CASE OF BITCOIN IN BRAZIL INNOVATION PRACTICES THROUGH KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS: PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION IN THE BRAZILIAN NAVY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES: ANALYSIS OF CONTEXT AND THE IMPLICATION IN THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS THE INFLUENCE OF A POSTGRADUATE COURSE IN UNDERTAKING AS A CAREER OPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1