基于ICAP框架的学生学习活动分析

Mengmeng Qi, Minghui Liu, Ting Yan, Bowen Liu
{"title":"基于ICAP框架的学生学习活动分析","authors":"Mengmeng Qi, Minghui Liu, Ting Yan, Bowen Liu","doi":"10.1145/3582580.3582633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve students’ academic performance, it is important to explore the frequency and differences of students’ learning activities in Science and Chinese classes. Based on the ICAP framework, this study designed learning activities coding scheme to analyze students’ learning activities in two classes video recordings (science and Chinese classes). Then χ2-test and social network analysis are conducted. The results revealed that the frequency of learning activities is: active > constructive > passive > instructive. The number of learning activities in Science class is more than that of Chinese class. Students tend to operate, summarize, discuss and communicate actively, but they are less likely to elaborate and defend for their own views. More importantly, Students’ learning activities have significant difference in Science and Chinese classes. We should pay more attention to design different learning activities in different classes.","PeriodicalId":138087,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Students’ Learning Activities Based on the ICAP Framework\",\"authors\":\"Mengmeng Qi, Minghui Liu, Ting Yan, Bowen Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3582580.3582633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve students’ academic performance, it is important to explore the frequency and differences of students’ learning activities in Science and Chinese classes. Based on the ICAP framework, this study designed learning activities coding scheme to analyze students’ learning activities in two classes video recordings (science and Chinese classes). Then χ2-test and social network analysis are conducted. The results revealed that the frequency of learning activities is: active > constructive > passive > instructive. The number of learning activities in Science class is more than that of Chinese class. Students tend to operate, summarize, discuss and communicate actively, but they are less likely to elaborate and defend for their own views. More importantly, Students’ learning activities have significant difference in Science and Chinese classes. We should pay more attention to design different learning activities in different classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3582580.3582633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Education Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3582580.3582633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高学生的学习成绩,探索学生在科学课和语文课上学习活动的频率和差异是很重要的。本研究基于ICAP框架,设计学习活动编码方案,分析学生在科学课和语文课两个课堂录像中的学习活动。然后进行χ2检验和社会网络分析。结果表明,学习活动的频率为:主动b>建设性>被动>指导性。科学课的学习活动数量多于语文课。学生倾向于积极地操作、总结、讨论和交流,但不太可能详细阐述和捍卫自己的观点。更重要的是,学生的学习活动在科学课和语文课上有显著差异。我们应该更加注意在不同的班级设计不同的学习活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Students’ Learning Activities Based on the ICAP Framework
To improve students’ academic performance, it is important to explore the frequency and differences of students’ learning activities in Science and Chinese classes. Based on the ICAP framework, this study designed learning activities coding scheme to analyze students’ learning activities in two classes video recordings (science and Chinese classes). Then χ2-test and social network analysis are conducted. The results revealed that the frequency of learning activities is: active > constructive > passive > instructive. The number of learning activities in Science class is more than that of Chinese class. Students tend to operate, summarize, discuss and communicate actively, but they are less likely to elaborate and defend for their own views. More importantly, Students’ learning activities have significant difference in Science and Chinese classes. We should pay more attention to design different learning activities in different classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Intelligent Evaluation Mechanism Enabling Four-Dimensional Experimental Ability Student Portrait Digital Branding of Vocational High School with Industrial Partnership: Case Study of SMK Muhammadiyah Kandanghaur, Indonesia The Application of Computer Virtual Simulation Technology in General Biological Experiment Teaching A Comprehensive Evaluation Mode for Higher Education Based on AHP-TOPSIS-EWM and Hierarchical Clustering Implementing e-learning, services portfolio and SLAs for Ethiopian Vocational Teacher Education: The case of ETU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1