服务要素价值导向优先性的定量评价

Chao Ma, Xiaofei Xu, Zhongjie Wang
{"title":"服务要素价值导向优先性的定量评价","authors":"Chao Ma, Xiaofei Xu, Zhongjie Wang","doi":"10.1109/IJCSS.2011.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Value is considered as the ultimate goal of a good service, and whether and to what degree the expected value could be delivered to customers and providers depends on capacities and quality of various functional service elements in service system. Different elements have different contributions to the value production. Due to the limit of available service components to construct the service system, it is necessary to measure the priority of each service element in service models so that those elements with higher value-oriented priorities (VOP) should be implemented by concrete service components earlier and with higher capability during the service system development. This paper presents a quantitative evaluation method of VOP. Basic definition and measurement of service value are firstly introduced, and then VOP is put forward following three types of particular priorities called sensitivity points, tradeoff points and key points. Their characteristics and evaluation principles are presented in details, and the process of the quantitative evaluation method is put forward subsequently. To complement the above discussion, a case study from ocean transportation service is applied for demonstration.","PeriodicalId":251415,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quantitative Evaluation on the Value-Oriented Priority of Service Elements\",\"authors\":\"Chao Ma, Xiaofei Xu, Zhongjie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IJCSS.2011.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Value is considered as the ultimate goal of a good service, and whether and to what degree the expected value could be delivered to customers and providers depends on capacities and quality of various functional service elements in service system. Different elements have different contributions to the value production. Due to the limit of available service components to construct the service system, it is necessary to measure the priority of each service element in service models so that those elements with higher value-oriented priorities (VOP) should be implemented by concrete service components earlier and with higher capability during the service system development. This paper presents a quantitative evaluation method of VOP. Basic definition and measurement of service value are firstly introduced, and then VOP is put forward following three types of particular priorities called sensitivity points, tradeoff points and key points. Their characteristics and evaluation principles are presented in details, and the process of the quantitative evaluation method is put forward subsequently. To complement the above discussion, a case study from ocean transportation service is applied for demonstration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCSS.2011.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Joint Conference on Service Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCSS.2011.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

价值被认为是一项好的服务的最终目标,能否以及在多大程度上将预期的价值传递给顾客和提供者取决于服务系统中各个功能服务要素的能力和质量。不同的要素对价值生产有不同的贡献。由于可用于构建服务系统的服务组件有限,因此有必要在服务模型中度量每个服务元素的优先级,以便在服务系统开发过程中,更早、更有能力地将VOP (value-oriented priorities)较高的元素由具体的服务组件实现。提出了一种VOP的定量评价方法。首先介绍了服务价值的基本定义和度量方法,然后提出了服务价值的概念,并将服务价值划分为三种特定的优先级:敏感点、权衡点和关键点。详细介绍了它们的特点和评价原则,并提出了定量评价方法的过程。为了补充上述讨论,本文以海洋运输业为例进行了论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Quantitative Evaluation on the Value-Oriented Priority of Service Elements
Value is considered as the ultimate goal of a good service, and whether and to what degree the expected value could be delivered to customers and providers depends on capacities and quality of various functional service elements in service system. Different elements have different contributions to the value production. Due to the limit of available service components to construct the service system, it is necessary to measure the priority of each service element in service models so that those elements with higher value-oriented priorities (VOP) should be implemented by concrete service components earlier and with higher capability during the service system development. This paper presents a quantitative evaluation method of VOP. Basic definition and measurement of service value are firstly introduced, and then VOP is put forward following three types of particular priorities called sensitivity points, tradeoff points and key points. Their characteristics and evaluation principles are presented in details, and the process of the quantitative evaluation method is put forward subsequently. To complement the above discussion, a case study from ocean transportation service is applied for demonstration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation Capability Reconfiguration of Manufacturing Firms for Servicization: A Conceptual Framework on Dynamic Capability Approach Intelligent Nutrition Service for Personalized Dietary Guidelines and Lifestyle Intervention Decision Constructing as Conceptualisation of Service Innovation Internal Service: Drivers of (dis)Satisfaction in the Chinese Context Reconsidering the Marketing Strategies over Social Network - On the Perspective of Network Topology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1