三维城市模型误差检测的自动比较方法

Benjamin Gorszczyk, G. Damiand, S. Servigne, A. Diakité, G. Gesquière
{"title":"三维城市模型误差检测的自动比较方法","authors":"Benjamin Gorszczyk, G. Damiand, S. Servigne, A. Diakité, G. Gesquière","doi":"10.2312/UDMV.20161416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D building models are needed in several professional domains. To provide better results, these models must be errors-free and that is why it is required to have a way to detect and to correct errors. These errors can be geometric, topological or semantic. By using a topological structure called EBM-LCC that allows to model buildings, we create a new tool that allows to detect these three type of errors in 3D city models. The solution we propose is an algorithm that compares two EBM-LCC. This algorithm can be used to compare two different models, for example acquired with two different processes, or resulting from two different acquisition campaigns. It is also an interesting tool to compare and validate algorithms. In this work, we compare an EBM-LCC loaded directly from a CityGML model with an EBM-LCC reconstructed from a soup of polygons only. Then we can use the result of this comparison to outline possible differences or to correct one of the two models by using the information of the other one. This algorithm allowed to automatically detect and correct semantic errors on several models that are currently used by professionals. This shows the interest of EBM-LCC for the city modeling domain as it helps to reach an error-free model.","PeriodicalId":161750,"journal":{"name":"Eurographics Workshop on Urban Data Modelling and Visualisation","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automatic Comparison Approach to Detect Errors on 3D City Models\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Gorszczyk, G. Damiand, S. Servigne, A. Diakité, G. Gesquière\",\"doi\":\"10.2312/UDMV.20161416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"3D building models are needed in several professional domains. To provide better results, these models must be errors-free and that is why it is required to have a way to detect and to correct errors. These errors can be geometric, topological or semantic. By using a topological structure called EBM-LCC that allows to model buildings, we create a new tool that allows to detect these three type of errors in 3D city models. The solution we propose is an algorithm that compares two EBM-LCC. This algorithm can be used to compare two different models, for example acquired with two different processes, or resulting from two different acquisition campaigns. It is also an interesting tool to compare and validate algorithms. In this work, we compare an EBM-LCC loaded directly from a CityGML model with an EBM-LCC reconstructed from a soup of polygons only. Then we can use the result of this comparison to outline possible differences or to correct one of the two models by using the information of the other one. This algorithm allowed to automatically detect and correct semantic errors on several models that are currently used by professionals. This shows the interest of EBM-LCC for the city modeling domain as it helps to reach an error-free model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurographics Workshop on Urban Data Modelling and Visualisation\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurographics Workshop on Urban Data Modelling and Visualisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2312/UDMV.20161416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurographics Workshop on Urban Data Modelling and Visualisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/UDMV.20161416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在一些专业领域需要三维建筑模型。为了提供更好的结果,这些模型必须是无错误的,这就是为什么需要有一种方法来检测和纠正错误。这些错误可以是几何的、拓扑的或语义的。通过使用一种叫做EBM-LCC的拓扑结构,我们创建了一种新的工具,可以检测3D城市模型中的这三种类型的错误。我们提出的解决方案是一种比较两个EBM-LCC的算法。该算法可用于比较两个不同的模型,例如,通过两个不同的过程获得的模型,或由两个不同的获取活动产生的模型。它也是比较和验证算法的有趣工具。在这项工作中,我们比较了直接从CityGML模型加载的EBM-LCC与仅从多边形汤中重建的EBM-LCC。然后,我们可以使用这种比较的结果来概述可能的差异,或者使用另一个模型的信息来纠正两个模型中的一个。该算法允许自动检测和纠正目前专业人员使用的几个模型上的语义错误。这显示了EBM-LCC对城市建模领域的兴趣,因为它有助于实现无错误的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Automatic Comparison Approach to Detect Errors on 3D City Models
3D building models are needed in several professional domains. To provide better results, these models must be errors-free and that is why it is required to have a way to detect and to correct errors. These errors can be geometric, topological or semantic. By using a topological structure called EBM-LCC that allows to model buildings, we create a new tool that allows to detect these three type of errors in 3D city models. The solution we propose is an algorithm that compares two EBM-LCC. This algorithm can be used to compare two different models, for example acquired with two different processes, or resulting from two different acquisition campaigns. It is also an interesting tool to compare and validate algorithms. In this work, we compare an EBM-LCC loaded directly from a CityGML model with an EBM-LCC reconstructed from a soup of polygons only. Then we can use the result of this comparison to outline possible differences or to correct one of the two models by using the information of the other one. This algorithm allowed to automatically detect and correct semantic errors on several models that are currently used by professionals. This shows the interest of EBM-LCC for the city modeling domain as it helps to reach an error-free model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Window Shape for Daylighting: An Urban Context Approach From Regional LULC Model to Urban Population Density Simulation in Wallonia Realistic Urban Road Network Modelling From GIS Data Interactive Low-Cost Wind Simulation For Cities City Reconstruction and Visualization from Public Data Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1