{"title":"递归神经网络用于自然语言生成的实验比较","authors":"H. Nakagama, S. Tanaka","doi":"10.1109/ICONIP.2002.1198155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the performance of three types of recurrent neural networks (RNN) for the production of natural language sentences: Simple Recurrent Networks (SRN), Back-Propagation Through Time (BPTT) and Sequential Recursive Auto-Associative Memory (SRAAM). We used simple and complex grammars to compare the ability of learning and being scaled up. Among them, SRAAM is found to have highest performance of training and producing fairly complex and long sentences.","PeriodicalId":146553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02.","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental comparison of recurrent neural network for natural language production\",\"authors\":\"H. Nakagama, S. Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICONIP.2002.1198155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the performance of three types of recurrent neural networks (RNN) for the production of natural language sentences: Simple Recurrent Networks (SRN), Back-Propagation Through Time (BPTT) and Sequential Recursive Auto-Associative Memory (SRAAM). We used simple and complex grammars to compare the ability of learning and being scaled up. Among them, SRAAM is found to have highest performance of training and producing fairly complex and long sentences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02.\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIP.2002.1198155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIP.2002.1198155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An experimental comparison of recurrent neural network for natural language production
We study the performance of three types of recurrent neural networks (RNN) for the production of natural language sentences: Simple Recurrent Networks (SRN), Back-Propagation Through Time (BPTT) and Sequential Recursive Auto-Associative Memory (SRAAM). We used simple and complex grammars to compare the ability of learning and being scaled up. Among them, SRAAM is found to have highest performance of training and producing fairly complex and long sentences.