货物液化及其对船舶稳定性的影响

Kie Hian Chua, Yali Zhang, D. Konovessis
{"title":"货物液化及其对船舶稳定性的影响","authors":"Kie Hian Chua, Yali Zhang, D. Konovessis","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-96448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fine grain solid bulk cargo with “sufficient” moisture content may undergo liquefaction during a voyage, posing a danger to the bulk carrier and the crew on-board due to its potential to shift and adversely affect the vessel’s stability. Between the years 2005 to 2017, it is believed that at least 21 bulk carriers have been lost due to cargo liquefaction. Most of these vessels are of 60,000 deadweight tonnes (DWT) and below, i.e. belonging to the “handysize” class. At the present moment, liquefaction is thought to occur through either conventional liquefaction or dynamic separation. In the former, wet granular cargo particles are rearranged through cyclic loads induced by the ship’s motions, resulting in overall compaction of the cargo and a corresponding increase in pore pressure between the particle grains. Shear resistance of the cargo pile decreases and movement of significant portions of the liquefied cargo material may occur, which in turn poses significant risks for the vessel. In dynamic separation, a pile of wet granular cargo particles undergo progressive transformation through intermediate stages, where the moisture separates from the cargo pile, forming fluid slurry comprising water and entrained particles that would be denser than water perched on top of a drier, compacted particle pile. The slurry will slosh with the vessel motion adversely influencing the stability of the vessel. Compared to conventional liquefaction, the compacted particle pile is drier and less susceptible to shift under vessel movement. In this study, a numerical modelling to assess the impact of the two cargo liquefaction mechanisms on a vessel’s stability is undertaken. The numerical models will be described and the results will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":345141,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cargo Liquefaction and Influence on Ship Stability\",\"authors\":\"Kie Hian Chua, Yali Zhang, D. Konovessis\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-96448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fine grain solid bulk cargo with “sufficient” moisture content may undergo liquefaction during a voyage, posing a danger to the bulk carrier and the crew on-board due to its potential to shift and adversely affect the vessel’s stability. Between the years 2005 to 2017, it is believed that at least 21 bulk carriers have been lost due to cargo liquefaction. Most of these vessels are of 60,000 deadweight tonnes (DWT) and below, i.e. belonging to the “handysize” class. At the present moment, liquefaction is thought to occur through either conventional liquefaction or dynamic separation. In the former, wet granular cargo particles are rearranged through cyclic loads induced by the ship’s motions, resulting in overall compaction of the cargo and a corresponding increase in pore pressure between the particle grains. Shear resistance of the cargo pile decreases and movement of significant portions of the liquefied cargo material may occur, which in turn poses significant risks for the vessel. In dynamic separation, a pile of wet granular cargo particles undergo progressive transformation through intermediate stages, where the moisture separates from the cargo pile, forming fluid slurry comprising water and entrained particles that would be denser than water perched on top of a drier, compacted particle pile. The slurry will slosh with the vessel motion adversely influencing the stability of the vessel. Compared to conventional liquefaction, the compacted particle pile is drier and less susceptible to shift under vessel movement. In this study, a numerical modelling to assess the impact of the two cargo liquefaction mechanisms on a vessel’s stability is undertaken. The numerical models will be described and the results will be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: CFD and FSI\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: CFD and FSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-96448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

具有“足够”水分含量的细粒固体散货可能在航行中发生液化,对散货船和船上的船员构成危险,因为它可能发生位移,并对船舶的稳定性产生不利影响。在2005年至2017年期间,据信至少有21艘散货船因货物液化而损失。这些船只大多为60,000载重吨或以下,即属于“灵便型”船级。目前,液化被认为是通过常规液化或动态分离进行的。前者通过船舶运动引起的循环载荷使湿粒状货物颗粒重新排列,导致货物整体压实,颗粒间孔隙压力相应增大。货物桩的抗剪能力降低,可能会发生很大一部分液化货物的移动,从而给船舶带来重大风险。在动态分离中,一堆潮湿的颗粒状货物颗粒经过中间阶段的逐步转化,在中间阶段,水分从货物堆中分离出来,形成由水和夹带颗粒组成的流体浆,这些颗粒比位于干燥、压实的颗粒堆顶部的水更密集。浆液会随着容器的运动而晃动,对容器的稳定性产生不利影响。与常规液化相比,压实颗粒桩更干燥,不易受船舶运动的影响。在本研究中,进行了数值模拟,以评估两种货物液化机制对船舶稳定性的影响。数值模型将被描述和结果将被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cargo Liquefaction and Influence on Ship Stability
Fine grain solid bulk cargo with “sufficient” moisture content may undergo liquefaction during a voyage, posing a danger to the bulk carrier and the crew on-board due to its potential to shift and adversely affect the vessel’s stability. Between the years 2005 to 2017, it is believed that at least 21 bulk carriers have been lost due to cargo liquefaction. Most of these vessels are of 60,000 deadweight tonnes (DWT) and below, i.e. belonging to the “handysize” class. At the present moment, liquefaction is thought to occur through either conventional liquefaction or dynamic separation. In the former, wet granular cargo particles are rearranged through cyclic loads induced by the ship’s motions, resulting in overall compaction of the cargo and a corresponding increase in pore pressure between the particle grains. Shear resistance of the cargo pile decreases and movement of significant portions of the liquefied cargo material may occur, which in turn poses significant risks for the vessel. In dynamic separation, a pile of wet granular cargo particles undergo progressive transformation through intermediate stages, where the moisture separates from the cargo pile, forming fluid slurry comprising water and entrained particles that would be denser than water perched on top of a drier, compacted particle pile. The slurry will slosh with the vessel motion adversely influencing the stability of the vessel. Compared to conventional liquefaction, the compacted particle pile is drier and less susceptible to shift under vessel movement. In this study, a numerical modelling to assess the impact of the two cargo liquefaction mechanisms on a vessel’s stability is undertaken. The numerical models will be described and the results will be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of CFD Analysis Procedure for Predicting Wind Load on Commercial Ships Multi-Phase Simulation of Droplet Trajectories of Wave-Impact Sea Spray Over a Vessel Numerical Study of Breaking Waves and Associated Wave Forces on a Jacket Substructure for Offshore Wind Turbines Numerical Simulation of Trim Optimization on Resistance Performance Based on CFD Method Fundamental CFD Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of the DARPA SUBOFF Submarine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1