在公共部门从事内部审计研究:为你的学术生涯切腹?没门!

Mélanie Roussy
{"title":"在公共部门从事内部审计研究:为你的学术生涯切腹?没门!","authors":"Mélanie Roussy","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, two reviews of the internal auditing literature identify only about 6% of published articles in the public sector context. Drawing on my own experience as an internal audit researcher and on these two literature reviews, I identify several research avenues specific to the practice of internal auditing in this sector. Notably, the impacts of the governance structure and the level of maturity of the organizations in which internal audit operates and of the external publication of internal audit reports remain insufficiently documented. I also debunk two persistent prejudices about internal audit and public sector research and discuss related methodological challenges that must be met to establish the relevance of studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"39 3","pages":"347-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging in internal audit research… in the public sector no less: A Hara-kiri for your academic career? No way!\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Roussy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recently, two reviews of the internal auditing literature identify only about 6% of published articles in the public sector context. Drawing on my own experience as an internal audit researcher and on these two literature reviews, I identify several research avenues specific to the practice of internal auditing in this sector. Notably, the impacts of the governance structure and the level of maturity of the organizations in which internal audit operates and of the external publication of internal audit reports remain insufficiently documented. I also debunk two persistent prejudices about internal audit and public sector research and discuss related methodological challenges that must be met to establish the relevance of studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"347-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近,对内部审计文献的两篇综述发现,在公共部门背景下发表的文章中,只有约6%。根据我自己作为内部审计研究员的经验和这两篇文献综述,我确定了几个专门针对该部门内部审计实践的研究途径。值得注意的是,内部审计运作的组织的治理结构和成熟度水平以及外部发布内部审计报告的影响仍然没有充分的文件记录。我还揭穿了关于内部审计和公共部门研究的两种持续存在的偏见,并讨论了为建立研究的相关性必须应对的相关方法挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging in internal audit research… in the public sector no less: A Hara-kiri for your academic career? No way!

Recently, two reviews of the internal auditing literature identify only about 6% of published articles in the public sector context. Drawing on my own experience as an internal audit researcher and on these two literature reviews, I identify several research avenues specific to the practice of internal auditing in this sector. Notably, the impacts of the governance structure and the level of maturity of the organizations in which internal audit operates and of the external publication of internal audit reports remain insufficiently documented. I also debunk two persistent prejudices about internal audit and public sector research and discuss related methodological challenges that must be met to establish the relevance of studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information A person-centered perspective on employees' human resource management values and their implication for organizational commitment The content, evolution and determinants of COVID-19 disclosures in Canadian financial statements and MD&A documents: An impression management perspective La contribution des fournisseurs à la résilience de la chaîne logistique d'équipements de protection individuelle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1