南非的社会经济权利和扩大司法救助:可以做些什么?

David Bilchitz
{"title":"南非的社会经济权利和扩大司法救助:可以做些什么?","authors":"David Bilchitz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3759963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter seeks to address the pressing question of how to improve access to justice in South Africa with a focus on socio-economic rights. It seeks to accomplish this through, firstly, conceiving of access to justice as a capability and exploring its importance. That, in turn requires attending to two central aspects: the internal dimension – empowering individuals to make claims – and the external dimension – relating to the design and availability of adequate institutional mechanisms to hear claims and adjudicate upon them. The chapter then considers practically the shortcomings in relation to access to justice in South Africa on both dimensions, internal – such as a lack of education – and external – such as the inadequate funding of chapter 9 institutions and the inability of Magistrate’s Courts to hear fundamental rights matters. Importantly, the institutions dealing with access to justice are conceived of holistically and include not only the courts but also the Public Protector and South African Human Rights Commission. Having analyzed the obstacles, the chapter seeks to consider solutions to these problems and makes concrete policy recommendations to enhance access to justice in the country. It draws on a comparative dimension from best practices in India and Colombia in making these recommendations. The recommendations include enhancing education and simplified procedures (such as the tutela in Colombia) on the internal dimension. On the external dimension, I consider expanding the capacities of chapter 9 institutions, creating specialist courts, expanding the jurisdiction of lower courts and distinguishing structural and individual cases.","PeriodicalId":356862,"journal":{"name":"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-Economic Rights and Expanding Access to Justice in South Africa: What Can Be Done?\",\"authors\":\"David Bilchitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3759963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter seeks to address the pressing question of how to improve access to justice in South Africa with a focus on socio-economic rights. It seeks to accomplish this through, firstly, conceiving of access to justice as a capability and exploring its importance. That, in turn requires attending to two central aspects: the internal dimension – empowering individuals to make claims – and the external dimension – relating to the design and availability of adequate institutional mechanisms to hear claims and adjudicate upon them. The chapter then considers practically the shortcomings in relation to access to justice in South Africa on both dimensions, internal – such as a lack of education – and external – such as the inadequate funding of chapter 9 institutions and the inability of Magistrate’s Courts to hear fundamental rights matters. Importantly, the institutions dealing with access to justice are conceived of holistically and include not only the courts but also the Public Protector and South African Human Rights Commission. Having analyzed the obstacles, the chapter seeks to consider solutions to these problems and makes concrete policy recommendations to enhance access to justice in the country. It draws on a comparative dimension from best practices in India and Colombia in making these recommendations. The recommendations include enhancing education and simplified procedures (such as the tutela in Colombia) on the internal dimension. On the external dimension, I consider expanding the capacities of chapter 9 institutions, creating specialist courts, expanding the jurisdiction of lower courts and distinguishing structural and individual cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3759963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3759963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章力求解决如何改善南非诉诸司法的机会这一紧迫问题,重点是社会经济权利。它力求通过以下方式实现这一目标:首先,将诉诸司法视为一种能力并探讨其重要性。这反过来又需要注意两个中心方面:内部方面- -赋予个人提出要求的权力- -和外部方面- -涉及设计和提供适当的体制机制来听取要求和作出裁决。然后,本章实际审议了南非在诉诸司法方面的两个方面的缺点,即内部- -例如缺乏教育- -和外部- -例如第9章机构的资金不足和地方法院无法审理基本权利问题。重要的是,处理诉诸司法的机构是整体考虑的,不仅包括法院,而且包括公共保护者和南非人权委员会。在分析了障碍之后,本章力求考虑解决这些问题的办法,并提出具体的政策建议,以增加该国诉诸司法的机会。在提出这些建议时,它借鉴了印度和哥伦比亚最佳做法的比较方面。建议包括在内部层面加强教育和简化程序(如哥伦比亚的监护)。在外部方面,我考虑扩大第9章机构的能力,设立专门法庭,扩大下级法院的管辖权,并区分结构性和个别案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socio-Economic Rights and Expanding Access to Justice in South Africa: What Can Be Done?
This chapter seeks to address the pressing question of how to improve access to justice in South Africa with a focus on socio-economic rights. It seeks to accomplish this through, firstly, conceiving of access to justice as a capability and exploring its importance. That, in turn requires attending to two central aspects: the internal dimension – empowering individuals to make claims – and the external dimension – relating to the design and availability of adequate institutional mechanisms to hear claims and adjudicate upon them. The chapter then considers practically the shortcomings in relation to access to justice in South Africa on both dimensions, internal – such as a lack of education – and external – such as the inadequate funding of chapter 9 institutions and the inability of Magistrate’s Courts to hear fundamental rights matters. Importantly, the institutions dealing with access to justice are conceived of holistically and include not only the courts but also the Public Protector and South African Human Rights Commission. Having analyzed the obstacles, the chapter seeks to consider solutions to these problems and makes concrete policy recommendations to enhance access to justice in the country. It draws on a comparative dimension from best practices in India and Colombia in making these recommendations. The recommendations include enhancing education and simplified procedures (such as the tutela in Colombia) on the internal dimension. On the external dimension, I consider expanding the capacities of chapter 9 institutions, creating specialist courts, expanding the jurisdiction of lower courts and distinguishing structural and individual cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Time-Space Compression Affect Analysts’ Forecast Performance? Comparison of Two Polynomial Geoid Models of GNSS/Leveling Geoid Development for Orthometric Heights in FCT, Abuja Socio-Economic Rights and Expanding Access to Justice in South Africa: What Can Be Done?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1