第四次工业革命:希望还是危险?

C. J. Barton
{"title":"第四次工业革命:希望还是危险?","authors":"C. J. Barton","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (4IR) debuted at the World Economic Forum’s 2016 conference as a vision of the future in which emerging technologies change “the very essence of our human experience.” Since then, the idea of 4IR has been used to promote a wide range of emerging technologies and organizations. This paper takes a critical look at the idea of the fourth industrial revolution, exploring how 4IR benefits the organizations which adopt it, the validity and implications of claiming that certain technologies cause ‘revolutionary’ change, and the consequences of adopting a vision of the future written and promoted by the notoriously exclusive World Economic Forum. I argue that 4IR is based in the flawed logic of technological determinism, and that it disempowers women, people of color, and the people of the Global South while reinforcing and justifying the power held over them by the Global North and its tech industries. 4IR is currently an attractive marketing phrase, but it damages the credibility and reputation of those who adopt it while promoting the development of technologies which serve private interests over public interests.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Promise or Peril?\",\"authors\":\"C. J. Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (4IR) debuted at the World Economic Forum’s 2016 conference as a vision of the future in which emerging technologies change “the very essence of our human experience.” Since then, the idea of 4IR has been used to promote a wide range of emerging technologies and organizations. This paper takes a critical look at the idea of the fourth industrial revolution, exploring how 4IR benefits the organizations which adopt it, the validity and implications of claiming that certain technologies cause ‘revolutionary’ change, and the consequences of adopting a vision of the future written and promoted by the notoriously exclusive World Economic Forum. I argue that 4IR is based in the flawed logic of technological determinism, and that it disempowers women, people of color, and the people of the Global South while reinforcing and justifying the power held over them by the Global North and its tech industries. 4IR is currently an attractive marketing phrase, but it damages the credibility and reputation of those who adopt it while promoting the development of technologies which serve private interests over public interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

“第四次工业革命”(4IR)在2016年世界经济论坛上首次亮相,作为对未来的展望,新兴技术改变了“我们人类体验的本质”。从那时起,第四次工业革命的概念被用于促进广泛的新兴技术和组织。本文对第四次工业革命的概念进行了批判性的审视,探讨了第四次工业革命如何使采用它的组织受益,声称某些技术导致“革命性”变化的有效性和含义,以及采用由世界经济论坛撰写和推动的未来愿景的后果。我认为,第四次工业革命是基于技术决定论的错误逻辑,它剥夺了女性、有色人种和全球南方人民的权力,同时强化了全球北方及其科技产业对他们的控制,并为之辩护。第四次工业革命目前是一个很有吸引力的营销术语,但它损害了那些采用它的人的信誉和声誉,同时促进了为私人利益而不是公共利益服务的技术的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Promise or Peril?
The “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (4IR) debuted at the World Economic Forum’s 2016 conference as a vision of the future in which emerging technologies change “the very essence of our human experience.” Since then, the idea of 4IR has been used to promote a wide range of emerging technologies and organizations. This paper takes a critical look at the idea of the fourth industrial revolution, exploring how 4IR benefits the organizations which adopt it, the validity and implications of claiming that certain technologies cause ‘revolutionary’ change, and the consequences of adopting a vision of the future written and promoted by the notoriously exclusive World Economic Forum. I argue that 4IR is based in the flawed logic of technological determinism, and that it disempowers women, people of color, and the people of the Global South while reinforcing and justifying the power held over them by the Global North and its tech industries. 4IR is currently an attractive marketing phrase, but it damages the credibility and reputation of those who adopt it while promoting the development of technologies which serve private interests over public interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1