匿名化智能电表数据缺乏匿名性的实证研究

Aljoscha Dietrich, Dominik Leibenger, Christoph Sorge
{"title":"匿名化智能电表数据缺乏匿名性的实证研究","authors":"Aljoscha Dietrich, Dominik Leibenger, Christoph Sorge","doi":"10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After over a decade of research into the privacy of smart meters, the sensitivity of an individual household’s fine-grained energy readings is undisputed. A plethora of research contributions aim at protecting the privacy of end users while at the same time providing the energy supplier (and others) with sufficient data for safe operation, billing, and also forecasting purposes. The transmission of fine-grained readings is generally considered acceptable as long as they cannot be linked to the households they originate from (i.e., anonymized readings).Martinez et al. just recently pointed out that the typical provision of aggregated readings at the end of a billing period could compromise this anonymity, as the individual readings must sum up to the respective aggregate. In this short paper, we complement their research by examining the privacy implications of published aggregates of previously anonymized energy readings:We simulate attacks on a real world data set (Smart*), particularly investigating the implications of different parameter combinations such as aggregation group sizes, considered time spans, and reading precision to gain insights into theoretic risks, e.g., from an incautious choice of parameters.","PeriodicalId":245782,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Lack of Anonymity of Anonymized Smart Meter Data: An Empiric Study\",\"authors\":\"Aljoscha Dietrich, Dominik Leibenger, Christoph Sorge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After over a decade of research into the privacy of smart meters, the sensitivity of an individual household’s fine-grained energy readings is undisputed. A plethora of research contributions aim at protecting the privacy of end users while at the same time providing the energy supplier (and others) with sufficient data for safe operation, billing, and also forecasting purposes. The transmission of fine-grained readings is generally considered acceptable as long as they cannot be linked to the households they originate from (i.e., anonymized readings).Martinez et al. just recently pointed out that the typical provision of aggregated readings at the end of a billing period could compromise this anonymity, as the individual readings must sum up to the respective aggregate. In this short paper, we complement their research by examining the privacy implications of published aggregates of previously anonymized energy readings:We simulate attacks on a real world data set (Smart*), particularly investigating the implications of different parameter combinations such as aggregation group sizes, considered time spans, and reading precision to gain insights into theoretic risks, e.g., from an incautious choice of parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 45th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN48667.2020.9314798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在对智能电表的隐私进行了十多年的研究之后,单个家庭精细的能源读数的敏感性是无可争议的。大量的研究贡献旨在保护最终用户的隐私,同时为能源供应商(和其他人)提供足够的数据,用于安全运行、计费和预测目的。细粒度读数的传输通常被认为是可以接受的,只要它们不能与它们的来源家庭联系起来(即匿名读数)。马丁内斯等人最近指出,在结算期结束时提供汇总读数的典型做法可能会损害这种匿名性,因为每个读数必须之和为各自的汇总。在这篇简短的论文中,我们通过检查先前匿名能量读数的已发布聚合的隐私含义来补充他们的研究:我们模拟对真实世界数据集(Smart*)的攻击,特别是调查不同参数组合的含义,如聚合组大小,考虑的时间跨度和阅读精度,以获得对理论风险的见解,例如,从不谨慎的参数选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Lack of Anonymity of Anonymized Smart Meter Data: An Empiric Study
After over a decade of research into the privacy of smart meters, the sensitivity of an individual household’s fine-grained energy readings is undisputed. A plethora of research contributions aim at protecting the privacy of end users while at the same time providing the energy supplier (and others) with sufficient data for safe operation, billing, and also forecasting purposes. The transmission of fine-grained readings is generally considered acceptable as long as they cannot be linked to the households they originate from (i.e., anonymized readings).Martinez et al. just recently pointed out that the typical provision of aggregated readings at the end of a billing period could compromise this anonymity, as the individual readings must sum up to the respective aggregate. In this short paper, we complement their research by examining the privacy implications of published aggregates of previously anonymized energy readings:We simulate attacks on a real world data set (Smart*), particularly investigating the implications of different parameter combinations such as aggregation group sizes, considered time spans, and reading precision to gain insights into theoretic risks, e.g., from an incautious choice of parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leveraging MEC in a 5G System for Enhanced Back Situation Awareness L3SFA: Load Shifting Strategy for Spreading Factor Allocation in LoRaWAN Systems PLEDGE: An IoT-oriented Proof-of-Honesty based Blockchain Consensus Protocol Don’t Stop at the Top: Using Certificate Transparency Logs to Extend Domain Lists for Web Security Studies SETA: Scalable Encrypted Traffic Analytics in Multi-Gbps Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1