战争、鸟类、文化起源和海洋交流

T. Reiss
{"title":"战争、鸟类、文化起源和海洋交流","authors":"T. Reiss","doi":"10.1086/693397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I t has proven hard to insert literature, the post-Renaissance West’s praxis of usually-written figurative thinking, symbolic imagination (which takes other forms and meanings in other times and cultures), or indeed other media of the fictive imagination into their material context and environs. Or it has at least proven hard to do so without interdicting, impeding, or curtailing the close reading of those media, or ruinously reducing contextual abundance to shape it either to wieldy order or to seeming analytical need of the textual, pictural, philosophical, musical, or other medium. Yet not to do so is to fall into mystifications of Kantian autonomy, as if artistic media had their own life outside other human activities; or as if they were a superstructure floating over material actions, however closely affected by, tied to, them; as if they were not as creative of those actions as they are created by them. Not to do so is also to fail to set them in histories beyond their local creation, to fail to know them as essentially in those wider histories, ultimately planetary (not to coin a phrase). This produces, too,a localizing of large culturalmovements. A clear case is the Italo-centric Renaissance, as if it were not","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wars, Birds, Cultural Origins, and Oceanic Exchanges\",\"authors\":\"T. Reiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/693397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I t has proven hard to insert literature, the post-Renaissance West’s praxis of usually-written figurative thinking, symbolic imagination (which takes other forms and meanings in other times and cultures), or indeed other media of the fictive imagination into their material context and environs. Or it has at least proven hard to do so without interdicting, impeding, or curtailing the close reading of those media, or ruinously reducing contextual abundance to shape it either to wieldy order or to seeming analytical need of the textual, pictural, philosophical, musical, or other medium. Yet not to do so is to fall into mystifications of Kantian autonomy, as if artistic media had their own life outside other human activities; or as if they were a superstructure floating over material actions, however closely affected by, tied to, them; as if they were not as creative of those actions as they are created by them. Not to do so is also to fail to set them in histories beyond their local creation, to fail to know them as essentially in those wider histories, ultimately planetary (not to coin a phrase). This produces, too,a localizing of large culturalmovements. A clear case is the Italo-centric Renaissance, as if it were not\",\"PeriodicalId\":187662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/693397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/693397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,很难将文学、文艺复兴后西方通常书面的具象思维、象征想象(在其他时代和文化中具有其他形式和意义)或其他虚构想象媒介插入到他们的物质背景和环境中。或者至少事实证明,如果不禁止、阻碍或限制对这些媒介的仔细阅读,或者破坏性地减少上下文的丰富程度,以塑造它,要么是可操作的秩序,要么是对文本、图片、哲学、音乐或其他媒介的表面分析需求,就很难做到这一点。然而,如果不这样做,就会陷入康德式自治的神秘化,仿佛艺术媒介在其他人类活动之外有自己的生命;或者仿佛它们是漂浮在物质活动之上的上层建筑,不管它们与物质活动有多么密切的关系和联系;好像他们对这些行为的创造性不如这些行为所创造的那样。不这样做,也就无法将它们置于本地创造之外的历史中,无法将它们本质上视为更广泛的历史,最终是行星(不要创造一个短语)。这也导致了大规模文化运动的本土化。一个明显的例子是以意大利为中心的文艺复兴,好像它不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wars, Birds, Cultural Origins, and Oceanic Exchanges
I t has proven hard to insert literature, the post-Renaissance West’s praxis of usually-written figurative thinking, symbolic imagination (which takes other forms and meanings in other times and cultures), or indeed other media of the fictive imagination into their material context and environs. Or it has at least proven hard to do so without interdicting, impeding, or curtailing the close reading of those media, or ruinously reducing contextual abundance to shape it either to wieldy order or to seeming analytical need of the textual, pictural, philosophical, musical, or other medium. Yet not to do so is to fall into mystifications of Kantian autonomy, as if artistic media had their own life outside other human activities; or as if they were a superstructure floating over material actions, however closely affected by, tied to, them; as if they were not as creative of those actions as they are created by them. Not to do so is also to fail to set them in histories beyond their local creation, to fail to know them as essentially in those wider histories, ultimately planetary (not to coin a phrase). This produces, too,a localizing of large culturalmovements. A clear case is the Italo-centric Renaissance, as if it were not
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1