{"title":"智能测试台怎么了?","authors":"Gary Smith","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2004.1431272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1996 a group of EDA Industry experk, primarily from the Formal Verification field, looked at the future of verification. The first conclusion was that there were no silver bullets. The answer to the Verification Crisis would have to be a suit of tools, each attacking the problem from a different perspective. Out of that discussion came the concept of the Intelligent Test bench. The idea of the Intelligent Test bench was a test bench that would look at a design, parfition if into verification blocks and then invoke the verification tool most suited for the particular verification challenge. To do this if was assumed that it would be necessary to use an ES Level Verification tool to provide the view of the design for proper partitioning. What actually happened was something a bit different.","PeriodicalId":240214,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04EX940)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What happened to the intelligent test bench?\",\"authors\":\"Gary Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2004.1431272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1996 a group of EDA Industry experk, primarily from the Formal Verification field, looked at the future of verification. The first conclusion was that there were no silver bullets. The answer to the Verification Crisis would have to be a suit of tools, each attacking the problem from a different perspective. Out of that discussion came the concept of the Intelligent Test bench. The idea of the Intelligent Test bench was a test bench that would look at a design, parfition if into verification blocks and then invoke the verification tool most suited for the particular verification challenge. To do this if was assumed that it would be necessary to use an ES Level Verification tool to provide the view of the design for proper partitioning. What actually happened was something a bit different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04EX940)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04EX940)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2004.1431272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04EX940)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2004.1431272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1996年,一群主要来自正式验证领域的EDA行业专家展望了验证的未来。第一个结论是没有灵丹妙药。验证危机的答案必须是一套工具,每个工具都从不同的角度来解决问题。从那次讨论中产生了智能测试台的概念。智能测试台架的思想是一个测试台架,它可以查看设计,将其划分为验证块,然后调用最适合特定验证挑战的验证工具。要做到这一点,假设有必要使用ES Level Verification工具来提供适当分区的设计视图。但实际发生的事情却有些不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What happened to the intelligent test bench?
In 1996 a group of EDA Industry experk, primarily from the Formal Verification field, looked at the future of verification. The first conclusion was that there were no silver bullets. The answer to the Verification Crisis would have to be a suit of tools, each attacking the problem from a different perspective. Out of that discussion came the concept of the Intelligent Test bench. The idea of the Intelligent Test bench was a test bench that would look at a design, parfition if into verification blocks and then invoke the verification tool most suited for the particular verification challenge. To do this if was assumed that it would be necessary to use an ES Level Verification tool to provide the view of the design for proper partitioning. What actually happened was something a bit different.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On identifying functionally untestable transition faults ATPG based functional test for data paths: application to a floating point unit Exploiting hypergraph partitioning for efficient Boolean satisfiability Reference model based RTL verification: an integrated approach An event-based network-on-chip monitoring service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1