{"title":"Osmanlı Toplumunda “Ahlaksızlar”: Ondokuzuncu Yüzyıl Sonunda Osmanlı Ahlak Söyleminin Jeneolojisi","authors":"S. Mustafa","doi":"10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1127356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Tanzimat edict the Ottoman state started to adopt a liberal governmental rationality similar to the Western states. According to Foucault, government refers to “the conduct of conduct” and governmentality is state’s use of modern and rational governmental techniques for conducting the acts of individuals and populations. At the turn of the century, the Ottoman state, which had increased its administrative modernization and centralization, became responsible for public security and order. The state apparatus provided this public order by reproducing the traditional morality of the neighborhood in the state discourse of governmentality. In other words, the moral discourse of the neighborhood was juxtaposed with the citizen-based liberal administrative discourse that responded to public safety, public health and the lower demands of the citizens. Presenting the genealogy of moral discourse in the late Ottoman society, this study shows that the moral regime in the premodern Ottoman neighborhood is combined with the modern administrative discourse focused on “good governance” that serves the safety and well-being of society and citizens (i.e., populations and the individuals in them, respectively).","PeriodicalId":128518,"journal":{"name":"Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55796/dusuncevetoplum.1127356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从Tanzimat法令之后,奥斯曼帝国开始采取一种类似于西方国家的自由主义政府理性。在福柯看来,政府指的是“行为的行为”,治理是国家运用现代的、合理的治理技术来指导个人和群体的行为。在世纪之交,加强了行政现代化和中央集权的奥斯曼帝国开始负责公共安全与秩序。国家机器通过在治理的国家话语中再现传统的邻里道德来提供这种公共秩序。换句话说,社区的道德话语与以公民为基础的自由行政话语并列,后者回应了公共安全、公共卫生和公民的较低要求。本研究呈现了晚期奥斯曼社会道德话语的谱系,表明前现代奥斯曼社区的道德制度与现代行政话语相结合,这些话语侧重于“善治”,服务于社会和公民(分别是人口和其中的个人)的安全和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Osmanlı Toplumunda “Ahlaksızlar”: Ondokuzuncu Yüzyıl Sonunda Osmanlı Ahlak Söyleminin Jeneolojisi
Since the Tanzimat edict the Ottoman state started to adopt a liberal governmental rationality similar to the Western states. According to Foucault, government refers to “the conduct of conduct” and governmentality is state’s use of modern and rational governmental techniques for conducting the acts of individuals and populations. At the turn of the century, the Ottoman state, which had increased its administrative modernization and centralization, became responsible for public security and order. The state apparatus provided this public order by reproducing the traditional morality of the neighborhood in the state discourse of governmentality. In other words, the moral discourse of the neighborhood was juxtaposed with the citizen-based liberal administrative discourse that responded to public safety, public health and the lower demands of the citizens. Presenting the genealogy of moral discourse in the late Ottoman society, this study shows that the moral regime in the premodern Ottoman neighborhood is combined with the modern administrative discourse focused on “good governance” that serves the safety and well-being of society and citizens (i.e., populations and the individuals in them, respectively).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instagram Usage Practices of Influencers as Impression Managers The Truth Beyond Relatıvıty: Karl Mannheım’s ‘Structures of Thinking’ The Story of 'Republic and Ataturk' in Corporate Advertisements Based on the 100th Anniversary of the Republic of Turkey: An Analysis with Barthes' Myth Analysis in the Scope of Cultural Perspective Alternatif Medya Kavramı Tartışmaları Ekseninde Türkiye’deki Ağ Tabanlı Alternatif Medya Üzerine Bir İnceleme SOSYAL MEDYA MECRALARI İLE BİREY ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİYE BRUNO LATOUR’UN AKTÖR-AĞ TEORİSİ AÇISINDAN BİR BAKIŞ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1