对社交机器人的期望和感知的性别差异

Gloria Beraldo, S. Battista, S. Badaloni, E. Menegatti, M. Pivetti
{"title":"对社交机器人的期望和感知的性别差异","authors":"Gloria Beraldo, S. Battista, S. Badaloni, E. Menegatti, M. Pivetti","doi":"10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate how the human sex could influence the perception of a social robot, supposed neutral and without applying possible manipulations. In addition we explore the kind of human-like actions people expect from a robot. We analyse twelve typical stereotypically male, female and neutral tasks in order to evaluate the possible interaction between the participant's sex and the robot's sex assignment. More precisely we study which of them, people consider a social robot able to do, could be useful for humans and/or they would like the robot to perform. In this regard, we found that the robot was perceived as more suitable in terms of usefulness for communication functions which include speaking, listening, talking, consistently with the human adjectives used by the participants to describe it (amiable, exhilarated, sociable, kind, sweet and brazen). The study involves young people, aged 19 years and older, who are not familiar with robotics.","PeriodicalId":441318,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in expectations and perception of a social robot\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Beraldo, S. Battista, S. Badaloni, E. Menegatti, M. Pivetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigate how the human sex could influence the perception of a social robot, supposed neutral and without applying possible manipulations. In addition we explore the kind of human-like actions people expect from a robot. We analyse twelve typical stereotypically male, female and neutral tasks in order to evaluate the possible interaction between the participant's sex and the robot's sex assignment. More precisely we study which of them, people consider a social robot able to do, could be useful for humans and/or they would like the robot to perform. In this regard, we found that the robot was perceived as more suitable in terms of usefulness for communication functions which include speaking, listening, talking, consistently with the human adjectives used by the participants to describe it (amiable, exhilarated, sociable, kind, sweet and brazen). The study involves young people, aged 19 years and older, who are not familiar with robotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了人类性别如何影响社会机器人的感知,假设中立,不应用可能的操纵。此外,我们还探索了人们对机器人的期望。我们分析了12个典型的男性、女性和中性任务,以评估参与者的性别和机器人的性别分配之间可能的相互作用。更准确地说,我们研究的是人们认为社交机器人能够做的事情中,哪些对人类有用,或者他们希望机器人去做。在这方面,我们发现机器人被认为更适合沟通功能,包括说话、倾听、交谈,与参与者用来描述它的人类形容词(和蔼可亲、兴奋、善于交际、善良、甜蜜和厚颜无耻)一致。这项研究涉及19岁及以上的年轻人,他们不熟悉机器人技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in expectations and perception of a social robot
In this paper we investigate how the human sex could influence the perception of a social robot, supposed neutral and without applying possible manipulations. In addition we explore the kind of human-like actions people expect from a robot. We analyse twelve typical stereotypically male, female and neutral tasks in order to evaluate the possible interaction between the participant's sex and the robot's sex assignment. More precisely we study which of them, people consider a social robot able to do, could be useful for humans and/or they would like the robot to perform. In this regard, we found that the robot was perceived as more suitable in terms of usefulness for communication functions which include speaking, listening, talking, consistently with the human adjectives used by the participants to describe it (amiable, exhilarated, sociable, kind, sweet and brazen). The study involves young people, aged 19 years and older, who are not familiar with robotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative robots system in a photography service using Kukanchi Ethical and Social Considerations for the Introduction of Human-Centered Technologies at Work Perceived Effects of Cycle Time in Human-Robot-Interaction Challenges and Requirements for Employee Qualification in the Context of Human-Robot-Collaboration Advancing Human-Robot Collaboration through Online Human Inverse Dynamics Estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1