防砂作业中砾石充填使用的流体分析

S. Ekwueme, K. K. Ihekoronye, Nkemakolam Chinedu Izuwa
{"title":"防砂作业中砾石充填使用的流体分析","authors":"S. Ekwueme, K. K. Ihekoronye, Nkemakolam Chinedu Izuwa","doi":"10.3968/11004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gravel pack fluids for proppant transport in sand control operations have been analyzed. The two fluids considered have been Xanthan and HEC. Laboratory experiment was conducted on the two fluids to determine their capabilities as carrier fluids. 30Lbs/Mgal and 40Lbs/Mgal of both fluids were considered using Trigonox A-W70 as breaker fluid. The result shows that Xanthan withstood more of the breaker fluid than HEC in terms of sand settling and breaker time. HEC broke at lesser time than Xanthan making Xanthan more capable to hold proppant at downhole conditions while transporting to target depth. The combined analyses of the breaking time, the sand settling capability, the plastic viscosity and pH makes Xanthan more preferable as a gravel pack fluid than Xanthan. However, HEC shows more ease of release of proppant once target depth is reached. Effect of proppant release and cost of proppant supports the choice of HEC as a gravel pack fluids. For optimized operation the combined use of HEC and Xanthan is recommended at calculated depth and downhole condition.","PeriodicalId":313367,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses of Fluids Used in Gravel Pack Placement in Sand Control Operations\",\"authors\":\"S. Ekwueme, K. K. Ihekoronye, Nkemakolam Chinedu Izuwa\",\"doi\":\"10.3968/11004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gravel pack fluids for proppant transport in sand control operations have been analyzed. The two fluids considered have been Xanthan and HEC. Laboratory experiment was conducted on the two fluids to determine their capabilities as carrier fluids. 30Lbs/Mgal and 40Lbs/Mgal of both fluids were considered using Trigonox A-W70 as breaker fluid. The result shows that Xanthan withstood more of the breaker fluid than HEC in terms of sand settling and breaker time. HEC broke at lesser time than Xanthan making Xanthan more capable to hold proppant at downhole conditions while transporting to target depth. The combined analyses of the breaking time, the sand settling capability, the plastic viscosity and pH makes Xanthan more preferable as a gravel pack fluid than Xanthan. However, HEC shows more ease of release of proppant once target depth is reached. Effect of proppant release and cost of proppant supports the choice of HEC as a gravel pack fluids. For optimized operation the combined use of HEC and Xanthan is recommended at calculated depth and downhole condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3968/11004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3968/11004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对防砂作业中用于支撑剂输送的砾石充填液进行了分析。考虑的两种液体是黄原胶和HEC。对这两种液体进行了实验室实验,以确定它们作为载液的能力。采用Trigonox A-W70作为破断液,分别考虑30Lbs/Mgal和40Lbs/Mgal的破断液。结果表明,黄原胶在沉砂和破碎时间方面比HEC更能承受破碎液的作用。HEC的破裂时间比黄原胶短,这使得黄原胶在井下条件下更能保持支撑剂,同时将支撑剂输送到目标深度。通过对破碎时间、砂沉降能力、塑性粘度和pH值的综合分析,认为黄原胶比黄原胶更适合作为砾石充填液。然而,HEC显示,一旦达到目标深度,支撑剂更容易释放。支撑剂释放的影响和支撑剂的成本支持HEC作为砾石充填液的选择。为了优化作业,建议在计算深度和井下条件下联合使用HEC和黄原胶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyses of Fluids Used in Gravel Pack Placement in Sand Control Operations
Gravel pack fluids for proppant transport in sand control operations have been analyzed. The two fluids considered have been Xanthan and HEC. Laboratory experiment was conducted on the two fluids to determine their capabilities as carrier fluids. 30Lbs/Mgal and 40Lbs/Mgal of both fluids were considered using Trigonox A-W70 as breaker fluid. The result shows that Xanthan withstood more of the breaker fluid than HEC in terms of sand settling and breaker time. HEC broke at lesser time than Xanthan making Xanthan more capable to hold proppant at downhole conditions while transporting to target depth. The combined analyses of the breaking time, the sand settling capability, the plastic viscosity and pH makes Xanthan more preferable as a gravel pack fluid than Xanthan. However, HEC shows more ease of release of proppant once target depth is reached. Effect of proppant release and cost of proppant supports the choice of HEC as a gravel pack fluids. For optimized operation the combined use of HEC and Xanthan is recommended at calculated depth and downhole condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brief Analysis on Application of Compound Salt Drilling Fluids About a Role of Microorganisms in Destruction of Rock Structure of An Oil Reservoir Analysis of Drill Pipe Failure Mechanism in SHYB-583 Well in Saudi Arabia Research on One Novel Logging Interpretation Method of CBM Reservoir The Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Deepwater Gas Well Testing String Risk Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1