19世纪和20世纪初英国的精神卫生保健方法

P. Nolan
{"title":"19世纪和20世纪初英国的精神卫生保健方法","authors":"P. Nolan","doi":"10.12968/bjmh.2022.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the mid-19th century, it was generally held by administrators and politicians that institutional confinement was the answer to many social problems. However, there were those both within and outside psychiatry who were concerned about what they perceived to be the limitations of the asylum system given that mental illness was poorly categorised – for example, it was uncertain whether alcohol abuse was an illness – the treatments unproven, and there were likely to be adverse effects of long-term institutionalisation. The size of institutions was questioned, as was the role of the private sector and whether the mentally ill could be entrusted to the care of poorly regulated facilities. This paper examines some of the expressed concerns about care of the mentally ill throughout the second half of the 19th century by reformers and psychiatrists with reference to the culture and management of institutions and private facilities, the exploitation of vulnerable people, and the emergence of home-based care provided by experienced and skilled nurses.","PeriodicalId":149493,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to mental health care in 19th and early 20th century England\",\"authors\":\"P. Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjmh.2022.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the mid-19th century, it was generally held by administrators and politicians that institutional confinement was the answer to many social problems. However, there were those both within and outside psychiatry who were concerned about what they perceived to be the limitations of the asylum system given that mental illness was poorly categorised – for example, it was uncertain whether alcohol abuse was an illness – the treatments unproven, and there were likely to be adverse effects of long-term institutionalisation. The size of institutions was questioned, as was the role of the private sector and whether the mentally ill could be entrusted to the care of poorly regulated facilities. This paper examines some of the expressed concerns about care of the mentally ill throughout the second half of the 19th century by reformers and psychiatrists with reference to the culture and management of institutions and private facilities, the exploitation of vulnerable people, and the emergence of home-based care provided by experienced and skilled nurses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2022.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2022.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在19世纪中期,管理人员和政治家普遍认为,制度限制是解决许多社会问题的办法。然而,精神病学内外的一些人都对他们认为的庇护制度的局限性感到担忧,因为精神疾病分类很差——例如,酗酒是否属于一种疾病是不确定的——治疗方法未经证实,而且长期收容可能会产生不利影响。机构的规模受到质疑,私营部门的作用也受到质疑,精神病患者是否可以委托给管理不善的机构照顾。本文研究了19世纪下半叶改革者和精神病学家对精神疾病患者护理的一些担忧,涉及机构和私人设施的文化和管理,对弱势群体的剥削,以及由经验丰富和熟练的护士提供的家庭护理的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Approaches to mental health care in 19th and early 20th century England
In the mid-19th century, it was generally held by administrators and politicians that institutional confinement was the answer to many social problems. However, there were those both within and outside psychiatry who were concerned about what they perceived to be the limitations of the asylum system given that mental illness was poorly categorised – for example, it was uncertain whether alcohol abuse was an illness – the treatments unproven, and there were likely to be adverse effects of long-term institutionalisation. The size of institutions was questioned, as was the role of the private sector and whether the mentally ill could be entrusted to the care of poorly regulated facilities. This paper examines some of the expressed concerns about care of the mentally ill throughout the second half of the 19th century by reformers and psychiatrists with reference to the culture and management of institutions and private facilities, the exploitation of vulnerable people, and the emergence of home-based care provided by experienced and skilled nurses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How carers' needs can be met by staff within inpatient settings: a qualitative study Move to improve physical and mental health Community rehabilitation for people with severe and enduring mental health difficulties: a description and evaluation of a new community enhanced rehabilitation team Misuse of the Mental Capacity Act: ‘you have capacity to end your life and there is nothing we can do about it’ The experiences, views and beliefs of emerging adults and their carers of receiving adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic review and meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1