N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan
{"title":"电子烟与烟草多用途:减少氧化应激,但类似的炎症作用","authors":"N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan","doi":"10.2174/04666230302120808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option.\n\n\n\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups.\n\n\n\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.\n\n\n\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test.\n\n\n\nMean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration\n\n\n\nThe mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years.\n\n\n\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions.\n\n\n\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.\n","PeriodicalId":110816,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Cigarettes Versus Tobacco Poly Use: Reduced Oxidative Stress but Similar Inflammatory Effect\",\"authors\":\"N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/04666230302120808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option.\\n\\n\\n\\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test.\\n\\n\\n\\nMean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration\\n\\n\\n\\nThe mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years.\\n\\n\\n\\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions.\\n\\n\\n\\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":110816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/04666230302120808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/04666230302120808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electronic Cigarettes Versus Tobacco Poly Use: Reduced Oxidative Stress but Similar Inflammatory Effect
Smoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option.
Smoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco.
This study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers.
This study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups.
This analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.
This analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test.
Mean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration
The mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years.
Oxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions.
Oxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.