电子烟与烟草多用途:减少氧化应激,但类似的炎症作用

N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan
{"title":"电子烟与烟草多用途:减少氧化应激,但类似的炎症作用","authors":"N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan","doi":"10.2174/04666230302120808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option.\n\n\n\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups.\n\n\n\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.\n\n\n\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test.\n\n\n\nMean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration\n\n\n\nThe mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years.\n\n\n\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions.\n\n\n\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.\n","PeriodicalId":110816,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Cigarettes Versus Tobacco Poly Use: Reduced Oxidative Stress but Similar Inflammatory Effect\",\"authors\":\"N. Khan, Ajwan Abdulmonem Hubail Al-Najar, Tanzima Tabassum, Fathima Leila Thaliffdeen, Safa Jawad Kadhum, A. S. Karanghadan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/04666230302120808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option.\\n\\n\\n\\nSmoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test.\\n\\n\\n\\nMean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration\\n\\n\\n\\nThe mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years.\\n\\n\\n\\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions.\\n\\n\\n\\nOxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":110816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/04666230302120808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/04666230302120808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

任何形式的吸烟都是患心血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺病、肺癌和其他氧化损伤引起的疾病的重要危险因素。电子烟的全球趋势日益增长,导致传统吸烟者认为电子烟是一种更安全的选择。任何形式的吸烟都是心血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺病、肺癌和氧化损伤的重要危险因素。电子烟的全球趋势使传统吸烟者相信它是更安全的选择,因为它不燃烧烟草。本研究旨在比较纯电子烟使用者和烟草多使用者(传统产品的吸烟组合)之间丙二醛(MDA)作为氧化损伤标志物的水平和高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)作为炎症标志物的水平。此外,研究还评估了身体质量指数、吸电子烟/吸烟的频率和持续时间对这些生物标志物的影响。本研究旨在比较丙二醛(MDA)水平的差异,丙二醛(MDA)是氧化损伤的标志,高敏感性c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)是炎症的标志,纯电子烟使用者和吸烟不同类型烟草组合的多使用者之间的差异。进一步观察体重指数、吸电子烟/吸烟频率和持续时间对两组生物标志物的影响。本分析性横断面试点研究包括40名年龄在18-25岁的男性(20名纯电子烟使用者和20名多重烟草使用者)。测定血清丙二醛(MDA)和hs-CRP,采用SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1进行数据分析。采用Mann-Whitney-U检测法比较两组患者hs-CRP和MDA的平均值。本分析性横断面试点研究对40名年龄在18-25岁的男性(20名纯电子烟使用者和20名烟草多使用者)进行了研究。采用标准方法测定血清丙二醛(MDA)和hs-CRP。采用SPSS 28.0.1.1版本进行数据分析。记录两组患者hs-CRP和MDA平均水平,并采用Mann-Whitney试验进行比较。两组患者hs-CRP平均水平差异无统计学意义。然而,纯电子烟使用者的丙二醛水平低于多种烟草使用者,特别是在BMI正常和吸电子烟/吸烟频率较高和持续时间较长的人群中。两组之间hs-CRP的平均水平无显著差异;然而,纯电子烟使用者的丙二醛水平低于多种烟草使用者,尤其是那些BMI正常的人、吸电子烟/吸烟更频繁的人以及吸电子烟/吸烟多年的人。纯电子烟使用者的氧化损伤较小,可能是比烟草多次使用危害更小的选择。然而,电子烟并不是传统吸烟最安全的替代品,因为它会导致类似程度的炎症相关心血管疾病风险。研究结果需要进一步探索,以研究对更大人群的长期影响,以得出明确的结论。纯电子烟使用者的氧化损伤较小,可能是比烟草多用途更无害的选择。然而,电子烟并不是传统吸烟最安全的替代品,因为它会导致类似程度的炎症相关疾病的风险。健康的生活方式所需要的唯一努力是戒烟,而不是替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic Cigarettes Versus Tobacco Poly Use: Reduced Oxidative Stress but Similar Inflammatory Effect
Smoking in any form is a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and other oxidative damage-induced diseases. The increasing global trend of E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to perceive them as a safer option. Smoking in any form is a significant risk factor in developing cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and oxidative damage. The global trend in E-cigarettes has led traditional smokers to believe it to be the safer option as it does not burn tobacco. This study aimed to compare the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between pure E-cigarette users and tobacco poly-users (smoking combinations of traditional products). Moreover, it also evaluated the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on these biomarkers. This study aimed to compare the differences in the levels of Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative damage and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as a marker of inflammation between Pure E-cigarette users and polyusers who smoke combinations of different types of tobacco. Further, observe the influence of Body Mass Index, frequency, and duration of vaping/smoking on the biomarkers between the two groups. This analytical cross-sectional pilot study included 40 males aged 18-25 (20 pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco poly-users). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum, and SPSS-Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels for the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test. This analytical cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 40 males aged 18-25 (20 Pure E-cigarette users and 20 tobacco polyusers). MDA and hs-CRP were estimated on serum using standard procedures. SPSS Version 28.0.1.1 was used for data analysis. Mean hs-CRP and MDA levels were recorded for the two groups, and a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test. Mean level of hs-CRP between the two groups was not significantly different. However, MDA levels were lower in pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco poly-users, especially among those with normal BMI and those who vaped/smoked more frequently and for a longer duration The mean level of hs-CRP between both groups was not significantly different; however, MDA levels were lower in Pure E-cigarette users than in tobacco polyusers, especially among those with normal BMI, those who vaped/smoked more frequently, and those who have been vaping/smoking for years. Oxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco poly-use. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related CVD. Findings need further exploration to study the long-term effects on a larger population group to draw definitive conclusions. Oxidative damage was lesser for pure E-cigarette users and could potentially be the less harmful option than tobacco polyuse. However, E-cigarettes are not the safest substitute for conventional smoking as it causes a similar extent of risk for inflammation-related diseases. The only effort needed for a healthy lifestyle is to target smoking cessation rather than substitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Mortality Following Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review Field Study on the Assessment of Antimalarial Drug Quality Using Minilab Kit in India Crossed Aphasia without Hemiparesis in a Dextral: A Case Report “A Comprehensive Review of Anaemia Associated with Hypothyroidism” Evaluation of Urinary Interleukin-18 Changes in Patients Treated with Vancomycin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1