追求提高学习:系统地调整和评估学习成果

D. Olsen, J. Keith, John Rosenberg
{"title":"追求提高学习:系统地调整和评估学习成果","authors":"D. Olsen, J. Keith, John Rosenberg","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty at large research universities are generally more focused on research than on careful assessment of student learning. When faced with the task of assessing student learning, faculty initially have little interest and view the effort as only valuable to satisfy accreditors or other external pressures. Researchers at a large US based university have worked for over a decade to improve faculty motivation for creating and using learning outcomes. During this decade the researchers have examined which factors are most important in helping faculty understand and own this process. Most U.S. colleges and universities are being asked to: 1) publish expected learning outcomes for each of their programs, 2) provide evidence that the expected learning outcomes are realized by students, and 3) demonstrate how such data collection and analyses leads to continuous improvement of student learning, the curriculum, and the university. This is a significant challenge, especially for large schools with many students. This paper illustrates 1) obstacles and challenges, 2) innovative strategies—some technological—employed to address the obstacles and challenges, and 3) current and future strategies for improved success. Institutional, college-wide, discipline-specific, and individual faculty perspectives to a systems approach of bridging assessment, learning outcomes, and accreditation will be presented. The importance of student involvement and public scrutiny throughout the process is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":136474,"journal":{"name":"2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quest for Increased Learning: Systematically Aligning and Assessing Learning Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"D. Olsen, J. Keith, John Rosenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faculty at large research universities are generally more focused on research than on careful assessment of student learning. When faced with the task of assessing student learning, faculty initially have little interest and view the effort as only valuable to satisfy accreditors or other external pressures. Researchers at a large US based university have worked for over a decade to improve faculty motivation for creating and using learning outcomes. During this decade the researchers have examined which factors are most important in helping faculty understand and own this process. Most U.S. colleges and universities are being asked to: 1) publish expected learning outcomes for each of their programs, 2) provide evidence that the expected learning outcomes are realized by students, and 3) demonstrate how such data collection and analyses leads to continuous improvement of student learning, the curriculum, and the university. This is a significant challenge, especially for large schools with many students. This paper illustrates 1) obstacles and challenges, 2) innovative strategies—some technological—employed to address the obstacles and challenges, and 3) current and future strategies for improved success. Institutional, college-wide, discipline-specific, and individual faculty perspectives to a systems approach of bridging assessment, learning outcomes, and accreditation will be presented. The importance of student involvement and public scrutiny throughout the process is highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型研究型大学的教师通常更注重研究,而不是认真评估学生的学习情况。当面对评估学生学习的任务时,教师最初没有什么兴趣,认为这种努力只是为了满足认证机构或其他外部压力。十多年来,美国一所大型大学的研究人员一直致力于提高教师创造和使用学习成果的积极性。在这十年中,研究人员研究了哪些因素在帮助教师理解和掌握这一过程中最重要。大多数美国学院和大学都被要求:1)公布每个项目的预期学习成果,2)提供学生实现预期学习成果的证据,3)证明这些数据收集和分析如何导致学生学习、课程和大学的持续改进。这是一个巨大的挑战,尤其是对于学生众多的大型学校来说。本文阐述了1)障碍和挑战,2)用于解决障碍和挑战的创新战略(一些技术),以及3)提高成功的当前和未来战略。将介绍机构,学院范围内,学科特定和个别教师对桥接评估,学习成果和认证的系统方法的观点。强调了学生参与和公众监督在整个过程中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Quest for Increased Learning: Systematically Aligning and Assessing Learning Outcomes
Faculty at large research universities are generally more focused on research than on careful assessment of student learning. When faced with the task of assessing student learning, faculty initially have little interest and view the effort as only valuable to satisfy accreditors or other external pressures. Researchers at a large US based university have worked for over a decade to improve faculty motivation for creating and using learning outcomes. During this decade the researchers have examined which factors are most important in helping faculty understand and own this process. Most U.S. colleges and universities are being asked to: 1) publish expected learning outcomes for each of their programs, 2) provide evidence that the expected learning outcomes are realized by students, and 3) demonstrate how such data collection and analyses leads to continuous improvement of student learning, the curriculum, and the university. This is a significant challenge, especially for large schools with many students. This paper illustrates 1) obstacles and challenges, 2) innovative strategies—some technological—employed to address the obstacles and challenges, and 3) current and future strategies for improved success. Institutional, college-wide, discipline-specific, and individual faculty perspectives to a systems approach of bridging assessment, learning outcomes, and accreditation will be presented. The importance of student involvement and public scrutiny throughout the process is highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a Multifaceted Evaluation System of Students' Learning Outcomes in Medical School Cognitive Acceleration Program in Undergraduate School Linking Business Strategies and System Demands Using GQM+Strategies and Systems Modeling Language Bubbloid Algorithm: A Simple Method for Generating Bubble-like Line Drawings Shape Recovery of Polyp Using Blood Vessel Detection and Matching Estimation by U-Net
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1