什么是会议摘要?会议语料库人类摘录摘要分析

Fei Liu, Yang Liu
{"title":"什么是会议摘要?会议语料库人类摘录摘要分析","authors":"Fei Liu, Yang Liu","doi":"10.3115/1622064.1622079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant research efforts have been devoted to speech summarization, including automatic approaches and evaluation metrics. However, a fundamental problem about what summaries are for the speech data and whether humans agree with each other remains unclear. This paper performs an analysis of human annotated extractive summaries using the ICSI meeting corpus with an aim to examine their consistency and the factors impacting human agreement. In addition to using Kappa statistics and ROUGE scores, we also proposed a sentence distance score and divergence distance as a quantitative measure. This study is expected to help better define the speech summarization problem.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"27 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are Meeting Summaries? An Analysis of Human Extractive Summaries in Meeting Corpus\",\"authors\":\"Fei Liu, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1622064.1622079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significant research efforts have been devoted to speech summarization, including automatic approaches and evaluation metrics. However, a fundamental problem about what summaries are for the speech data and whether humans agree with each other remains unclear. This paper performs an analysis of human annotated extractive summaries using the ICSI meeting corpus with an aim to examine their consistency and the factors impacting human agreement. In addition to using Kappa statistics and ROUGE scores, we also proposed a sentence distance score and divergence distance as a quantitative measure. This study is expected to help better define the speech summarization problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1622064.1622079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

语音摘要的研究已经取得了重大进展,包括自动方法和评价指标。然而,关于语音数据的摘要是什么以及人类是否彼此同意的一个基本问题仍然不清楚。本文使用ICSI会议语料库对人类注释摘录摘要进行了分析,目的是检查它们的一致性和影响人类协议的因素。除了使用Kappa统计和ROUGE分数外,我们还提出了句子距离分数和分歧距离作为定量度量。本研究可望有助于更好地界定语音摘要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Are Meeting Summaries? An Analysis of Human Extractive Summaries in Meeting Corpus
Significant research efforts have been devoted to speech summarization, including automatic approaches and evaluation metrics. However, a fundamental problem about what summaries are for the speech data and whether humans agree with each other remains unclear. This paper performs an analysis of human annotated extractive summaries using the ICSI meeting corpus with an aim to examine their consistency and the factors impacting human agreement. In addition to using Kappa statistics and ROUGE scores, we also proposed a sentence distance score and divergence distance as a quantitative measure. This study is expected to help better define the speech summarization problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1