基于SAP 2000软件的g +20电梯剪力墙填充框架抗震响应分析

Datta P. Khade, Rahul D. Pandit, Dr. Abhijeet P. Wadekar
{"title":"基于SAP 2000软件的g +20电梯剪力墙填充框架抗震响应分析","authors":"Datta P. Khade, Rahul D. Pandit, Dr. Abhijeet P. Wadekar","doi":"10.53555/eijse.v4i3.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analysis on performance-based seismic evaluation of G+20 RC frame Building with masonry infill (MI) and shear wall (SW) for lift using Non-linear Static Pushover Analysis with SAP2000v14 software for two different models i.e., Model-1: RC bare frame and Model-2: RC frame with MI wall and SW for lift (Soft storey). Result indicates, maximum Displacement for Model-1 i.e., 0.3346m, Model-2 gave displacement of 0.0718m respectively. These results clearly show, the stiffening in Model-2 is increased to 78.54% compared to Bare Frame. \n                                                                                                                                      ","PeriodicalId":354866,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“SEISMIC RESPONSE OF INFILL FRAME G+20 BUILDING WITH SHEAR WALL FOR LIFT USING SAP 2000 SOFTWARE”\",\"authors\":\"Datta P. Khade, Rahul D. Pandit, Dr. Abhijeet P. Wadekar\",\"doi\":\"10.53555/eijse.v4i3.168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an analysis on performance-based seismic evaluation of G+20 RC frame Building with masonry infill (MI) and shear wall (SW) for lift using Non-linear Static Pushover Analysis with SAP2000v14 software for two different models i.e., Model-1: RC bare frame and Model-2: RC frame with MI wall and SW for lift (Soft storey). Result indicates, maximum Displacement for Model-1 i.e., 0.3346m, Model-2 gave displacement of 0.0718m respectively. These results clearly show, the stiffening in Model-2 is increased to 78.54% compared to Bare Frame. \\n                                                                                                                                      \",\"PeriodicalId\":354866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijse.v4i3.168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijse.v4i3.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用SAP2000v14软件对两种不同模型,即模型1:混凝土裸框架和模型2:混凝土框架,砌体填充(MI)和剪力墙(SW)用于提升(软层),使用非线性静力推覆分析对G+20混凝土框架进行了基于性能的地震评估。结果表明,模型1的最大位移为0.3346m,模型2的最大位移为0.0718m。这些结果清楚地表明,模型2的刚度比裸框架提高了78.54%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“SEISMIC RESPONSE OF INFILL FRAME G+20 BUILDING WITH SHEAR WALL FOR LIFT USING SAP 2000 SOFTWARE”
This paper presents an analysis on performance-based seismic evaluation of G+20 RC frame Building with masonry infill (MI) and shear wall (SW) for lift using Non-linear Static Pushover Analysis with SAP2000v14 software for two different models i.e., Model-1: RC bare frame and Model-2: RC frame with MI wall and SW for lift (Soft storey). Result indicates, maximum Displacement for Model-1 i.e., 0.3346m, Model-2 gave displacement of 0.0718m respectively. These results clearly show, the stiffening in Model-2 is increased to 78.54% compared to Bare Frame.                                                                                                                                       
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES OF FAMILY CAREGIVERS OF TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS AT THE TAMALE REGIONAL HOSPITAL AI-DRIVEN BIG DATA ANALYTICS: UNVEILING INSIGHTS FOR BUSINESS ADVANCEMENT SAFEGUARDING STABILITY: STRATEGIES FOR ADDRESSING DYNAMIC SYSTEM VARIATIONS IN POWER GRID CYBERSECURITY A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW ON DATA STREAM MINING TECHNIQUES FOR DATA CLASSIFICATION; AND FUTURE TRENDS SUPERCONDUCTIVITY IN THE QUATERNARY INTERMETALLIC COMPOUND YNI2-XTXB2C
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1