网络管理性能分析和可伸缩性测试:SNMP与CORBA

Q. Gu, A. Marshall
{"title":"网络管理性能分析和可伸缩性测试:SNMP与CORBA","authors":"Q. Gu, A. Marshall","doi":"10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of network management applications is becoming an increasingly important factor as the scale of the networks they have to manage increases. This paper presents a series of comparative performance tests on two common platforms used for network management: SNMP and CORBA. In terms of network performance, the two platforms are used to achieve the same network management tasks. The bandwidth consumed and the time taken to complete the tasks is compared. Both systems were tested by manipulating different types of management objects (single or tabular) in different network environments. The results highlight the bottlenecks in each system and the reasons for them. The paper compares both systems and identifies their respective advantages and disadvantages. The work shows that their different features will decide what kind of application they are most suited to.","PeriodicalId":260367,"journal":{"name":"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network management performance analysis and scalability tests: SNMP vs. CORBA\",\"authors\":\"Q. Gu, A. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of network management applications is becoming an increasingly important factor as the scale of the networks they have to manage increases. This paper presents a series of comparative performance tests on two common platforms used for network management: SNMP and CORBA. In terms of network performance, the two platforms are used to achieve the same network management tasks. The bandwidth consumed and the time taken to complete the tasks is compared. Both systems were tested by manipulating different types of management objects (single or tabular) in different network environments. The results highlight the bottlenecks in each system and the reasons for them. The paper compares both systems and identifies their respective advantages and disadvantages. The work shows that their different features will decide what kind of application they are most suited to.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37507)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2004.1317758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

随着需要管理的网络规模的增加,网络管理应用程序的性能正成为一个越来越重要的因素。本文在两种常用的网络管理平台:SNMP和CORBA上进行了一系列性能对比测试。在网络性能方面,这两个平台可以实现相同的网络管理任务。比较所消耗的带宽和完成任务所需的时间。通过在不同的网络环境中操作不同类型的管理对象(单个或表格)对这两个系统进行了测试。结果突出了每个系统中的瓶颈及其原因。本文对两种制度进行了比较,并指出了各自的优缺点。研究表明,它们的不同特性将决定它们最适合哪种应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Network management performance analysis and scalability tests: SNMP vs. CORBA
The performance of network management applications is becoming an increasingly important factor as the scale of the networks they have to manage increases. This paper presents a series of comparative performance tests on two common platforms used for network management: SNMP and CORBA. In terms of network performance, the two platforms are used to achieve the same network management tasks. The bandwidth consumed and the time taken to complete the tasks is compared. Both systems were tested by manipulating different types of management objects (single or tabular) in different network environments. The results highlight the bottlenecks in each system and the reasons for them. The paper compares both systems and identifies their respective advantages and disadvantages. The work shows that their different features will decide what kind of application they are most suited to.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking manageability - advances and emerging paradigm shifts in managing intelligent IP networks Using application feedback in differentiated services and policies Discovering IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels in the Internet Broadband wireless access Management of BGP/MPLS VPN with resilient paths
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1