在通信辅助方案中协调不同线路中继

W. Tucker, Andrew K. Burich, M. Thompson, RadhaKiranMaye Anne, Sneha Vasudevan
{"title":"在通信辅助方案中协调不同线路中继","authors":"W. Tucker, Andrew K. Burich, M. Thompson, RadhaKiranMaye Anne, Sneha Vasudevan","doi":"10.1109/CPRE.2014.6798998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communications-assisted (pilot) protection schemes are used to provide high-speed simultaneous fault clearance from each end of a line. The most common pilot schemes used in the industry are permissive overreaching transfer trip (POTT) and directional comparison blocking (DCB). For secure operation, ensuring coordination between the local and remote relays is absolutely necessary. A common myth is that POTT schemes do not have to be coordinated. However, when applying modern POTT schemes that include advanced features such as current reversal and echo logic, reverse blocking elements play an important role and need to be properly coordinated. Good engineering practice suggests using the same type of relay at both terminals in a pilot scheme. However, sometimes this is not possible due to construction, project schedule timing, or budget constraints. Further, when the line is a tie line, transmission facility owners often mutually agree to select dissimilar relays to prevent having to vary from their standards for maintenance, spare equipment, and training reasons. Using different models, manufacturers, and vintages of microprocessor-based relays in a pilot scheme presents coordination difficulties due to different operation principles that result in different sensitivities, speeds, and transient responses. This paper presents a number of such problems and challenges discovered in realworld applications. The paper then proposes solutions to minimize the risk of misoperation and achieve good fault coverage. Finally, the paper discusses the pros and cons of the proposed solutions, keeping in mind the effect power system faults have on power quality and system stability.","PeriodicalId":285252,"journal":{"name":"2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coordinating dissimilar line relays in a communications-assisted scheme\",\"authors\":\"W. Tucker, Andrew K. Burich, M. Thompson, RadhaKiranMaye Anne, Sneha Vasudevan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPRE.2014.6798998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Communications-assisted (pilot) protection schemes are used to provide high-speed simultaneous fault clearance from each end of a line. The most common pilot schemes used in the industry are permissive overreaching transfer trip (POTT) and directional comparison blocking (DCB). For secure operation, ensuring coordination between the local and remote relays is absolutely necessary. A common myth is that POTT schemes do not have to be coordinated. However, when applying modern POTT schemes that include advanced features such as current reversal and echo logic, reverse blocking elements play an important role and need to be properly coordinated. Good engineering practice suggests using the same type of relay at both terminals in a pilot scheme. However, sometimes this is not possible due to construction, project schedule timing, or budget constraints. Further, when the line is a tie line, transmission facility owners often mutually agree to select dissimilar relays to prevent having to vary from their standards for maintenance, spare equipment, and training reasons. Using different models, manufacturers, and vintages of microprocessor-based relays in a pilot scheme presents coordination difficulties due to different operation principles that result in different sensitivities, speeds, and transient responses. This paper presents a number of such problems and challenges discovered in realworld applications. The paper then proposes solutions to minimize the risk of misoperation and achieve good fault coverage. Finally, the paper discusses the pros and cons of the proposed solutions, keeping in mind the effect power system faults have on power quality and system stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPRE.2014.6798998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPRE.2014.6798998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

通信辅助(导频)保护方案用于从线路的每一端提供高速同时故障清除。行业中最常用的试点方案是允许过伸转移行程(POTT)和定向比较阻塞(DCB)。为了安全运行,确保本地和远程中继之间的协调是绝对必要的。一个常见的误解是,pot计划不必协调。然而,当应用包括电流反转和回波逻辑等高级功能的现代POTT方案时,反向阻塞元件起着重要的作用,需要适当地协调。良好的工程实践建议在试验方案中在两个端子上使用相同类型的继电器。然而,有时由于施工、项目进度、时间或预算限制,这是不可能的。此外,当线路是固定线路时,输电设施所有者通常同意选择不同的继电器,以防止因维护、备用设备和培训原因而不得不改变其标准。在试点方案中使用不同型号、制造商和基于微处理器的继电器,由于不同的操作原理导致不同的灵敏度、速度和瞬态响应,因此存在协调困难。本文介绍了在实际应用中发现的一些此类问题和挑战。然后,本文提出了降低误操作风险和实现良好故障覆盖率的解决方案。最后,考虑到电力系统故障对电能质量和系统稳定性的影响,讨论了所提出的解决方案的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coordinating dissimilar line relays in a communications-assisted scheme
Communications-assisted (pilot) protection schemes are used to provide high-speed simultaneous fault clearance from each end of a line. The most common pilot schemes used in the industry are permissive overreaching transfer trip (POTT) and directional comparison blocking (DCB). For secure operation, ensuring coordination between the local and remote relays is absolutely necessary. A common myth is that POTT schemes do not have to be coordinated. However, when applying modern POTT schemes that include advanced features such as current reversal and echo logic, reverse blocking elements play an important role and need to be properly coordinated. Good engineering practice suggests using the same type of relay at both terminals in a pilot scheme. However, sometimes this is not possible due to construction, project schedule timing, or budget constraints. Further, when the line is a tie line, transmission facility owners often mutually agree to select dissimilar relays to prevent having to vary from their standards for maintenance, spare equipment, and training reasons. Using different models, manufacturers, and vintages of microprocessor-based relays in a pilot scheme presents coordination difficulties due to different operation principles that result in different sensitivities, speeds, and transient responses. This paper presents a number of such problems and challenges discovered in realworld applications. The paper then proposes solutions to minimize the risk of misoperation and achieve good fault coverage. Finally, the paper discusses the pros and cons of the proposed solutions, keeping in mind the effect power system faults have on power quality and system stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing the tester, common pitfalls testing Microprocessor based relays Improvements in the operation of a distance relay during resistive faults Preventing transformer mis-operations for external faults Open-circuited CT misoperation and investigation Enhanced distribution feeder fault location
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1