{"title":"尼泊尔医学院附属医院阴道辅助分娩的胎母结局","authors":"Durga Bc, R. Jha, R. Das","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Instrumental vaginal delivery is performed in second stage of labor to expedite delivery with aim to decrease cesarean section rate. Worldwide 10-20% of laboring women need obstetrics intervention for delivery. \nAims: To evaluate the indication and fetomaternal outcome of instrumental vaginal delivery. \nMethods: This is a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynecology. The study was done from July 2021 to July 2022 for a period of one year. Data were collected, recorded in standard proforma and analyzed by using SPPS version 20. \nResults: The out of 6123 deliveries, 149(2.4%) had instrumental vaginal delivery. Out of 149 participants, 41.6% were between 20-24 years, 10.7% were of age group 15-19 years and 4% ladies were of >35 years. Instrument delivery was more frequently applied in primigravida in comparison to multigravida (57.3% vs 42.3%) p=0.046. The most common indication for instrumentation was poor maternal effort (41%) followed by fetal distress (33.6%). About 14.1% had postpartum haemorrhage, 3.4% had vulval hematoma, and 38.3% babies had Neonatal Intensive Care unit admission. \nConclusion: Poor maternal effort and fetal distress were the common indications for instrumental delivery with some fetomaternal complications. Inspite of the complications, if used by an expertise, instrumental delivery can reduce the need of cesarean section.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetomaternal Outcome of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery at Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital Kohalpur\",\"authors\":\"Durga Bc, R. Jha, R. Das\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Instrumental vaginal delivery is performed in second stage of labor to expedite delivery with aim to decrease cesarean section rate. Worldwide 10-20% of laboring women need obstetrics intervention for delivery. \\nAims: To evaluate the indication and fetomaternal outcome of instrumental vaginal delivery. \\nMethods: This is a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynecology. The study was done from July 2021 to July 2022 for a period of one year. Data were collected, recorded in standard proforma and analyzed by using SPPS version 20. \\nResults: The out of 6123 deliveries, 149(2.4%) had instrumental vaginal delivery. Out of 149 participants, 41.6% were between 20-24 years, 10.7% were of age group 15-19 years and 4% ladies were of >35 years. Instrument delivery was more frequently applied in primigravida in comparison to multigravida (57.3% vs 42.3%) p=0.046. The most common indication for instrumentation was poor maternal effort (41%) followed by fetal distress (33.6%). About 14.1% had postpartum haemorrhage, 3.4% had vulval hematoma, and 38.3% babies had Neonatal Intensive Care unit admission. \\nConclusion: Poor maternal effort and fetal distress were the common indications for instrumental delivery with some fetomaternal complications. Inspite of the complications, if used by an expertise, instrumental delivery can reduce the need of cesarean section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:辅助阴道分娩在第二产程进行,以加快分娩,目的是降低剖宫产率。全世界10-20%的分娩妇女需要产科干预。目的:探讨阴道辅助分娩的适应证及结局。方法:这是一项在妇产科进行的以医院为基础的横断面研究。该研究于2021年7月至2022年7月进行,为期一年。收集数据,以标准形式记录,并使用SPPS version 20进行分析。结果:6123例分娩中,器械阴道分娩149例(2.4%)。在149名参与者中,41.6%的人年龄在20-24岁之间,10.7%的人年龄在15-19岁之间,4%的人年龄在50 - 35岁之间。与多胎孕妇相比,初产妇使用器械的频率更高(57.3% vs 42.3%) p=0.046。最常见的器械指征是产妇努力不足(41%),其次是胎儿窘迫(33.6%)。14.1%发生产后出血,3.4%发生外阴血肿,38.3%进入新生儿重症监护病房。结论:产妇用力差和胎儿窘迫是器械分娩的常见指征,并伴有一些母婴并发症。尽管有并发症,如果由专业人员使用,器械分娩可以减少剖宫产的需要。
Fetomaternal Outcome of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery at Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital Kohalpur
Introduction: Instrumental vaginal delivery is performed in second stage of labor to expedite delivery with aim to decrease cesarean section rate. Worldwide 10-20% of laboring women need obstetrics intervention for delivery.
Aims: To evaluate the indication and fetomaternal outcome of instrumental vaginal delivery.
Methods: This is a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynecology. The study was done from July 2021 to July 2022 for a period of one year. Data were collected, recorded in standard proforma and analyzed by using SPPS version 20.
Results: The out of 6123 deliveries, 149(2.4%) had instrumental vaginal delivery. Out of 149 participants, 41.6% were between 20-24 years, 10.7% were of age group 15-19 years and 4% ladies were of >35 years. Instrument delivery was more frequently applied in primigravida in comparison to multigravida (57.3% vs 42.3%) p=0.046. The most common indication for instrumentation was poor maternal effort (41%) followed by fetal distress (33.6%). About 14.1% had postpartum haemorrhage, 3.4% had vulval hematoma, and 38.3% babies had Neonatal Intensive Care unit admission.
Conclusion: Poor maternal effort and fetal distress were the common indications for instrumental delivery with some fetomaternal complications. Inspite of the complications, if used by an expertise, instrumental delivery can reduce the need of cesarean section.