俄罗斯联邦科学与创新法典:概念与结构

A. Vasiliev, Yuliya Pechatnova
{"title":"俄罗斯联邦科学与创新法典:概念与结构","authors":"A. Vasiliev, Yuliya Pechatnova","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the idea of separating scientific concepts aimed at studying the legal regulation of scientific activity, emphasizes the relevance of the ongoing research in that, as of today, there is no balanced legislative regulation of scientific and innovative activities. The research methodology is represented by general scientific methods and special legal methods of study. Thus, the logical method made it possible to highlight the prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation. The historical method contributed to the historical and legal analysis of the development of the idea of forming a unified law on scientific and innovative activities. The modeling method made it possible to form the optimal structure of the draft code of laws on science and innovation. Using the formal legal method, the analysis of the current legislation and doctrinal approaches to the legal regulation of science and education was carried out. The authors identify the following prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation: the multiplicity and inconsistency of existing regulatory legal acts on science and innovation; lack of a unified ideological basis for the legal regulation of science; increasing the level of scientific development of the scientific and legal sphere; taking into account the specifics of scientific and technical legal regulation; increasing the importance of the studied sphere of legal regulation; development of a mature state scientific and technical policy. In conclusion, the authors propose the structure of the code of laws on science and innovation, it is noted that the code can take its rightful place in the development of an ideology for the development and management of science in the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"57 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Code of Laws on Science and Innovations of the Russian Federation: Concept and Structure\",\"authors\":\"A. Vasiliev, Yuliya Pechatnova\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the idea of separating scientific concepts aimed at studying the legal regulation of scientific activity, emphasizes the relevance of the ongoing research in that, as of today, there is no balanced legislative regulation of scientific and innovative activities. The research methodology is represented by general scientific methods and special legal methods of study. Thus, the logical method made it possible to highlight the prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation. The historical method contributed to the historical and legal analysis of the development of the idea of forming a unified law on scientific and innovative activities. The modeling method made it possible to form the optimal structure of the draft code of laws on science and innovation. Using the formal legal method, the analysis of the current legislation and doctrinal approaches to the legal regulation of science and education was carried out. The authors identify the following prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation: the multiplicity and inconsistency of existing regulatory legal acts on science and innovation; lack of a unified ideological basis for the legal regulation of science; increasing the level of scientific development of the scientific and legal sphere; taking into account the specifics of scientific and technical legal regulation; increasing the importance of the studied sphere of legal regulation; development of a mature state scientific and technical policy. In conclusion, the authors propose the structure of the code of laws on science and innovation, it is noted that the code can take its rightful place in the development of an ideology for the development and management of science in the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了科学概念分离的思想,旨在研究科学活动的法律规制,强调了正在进行的研究的相关性,因为到目前为止,科学与创新活动还没有平衡的立法规制。研究方法以一般的科学方法和特殊的法律研究方法为代表。因此,逻辑方法使我们有可能强调制定科学和创新法典的先决条件。历史方法有助于对科学和创新活动形成统一法律的思想的发展进行历史和法律分析。该建模方法为科学创新法典草案的优化结构的形成提供了可能。使用正式的法律方法,分析当前的立法和学说的科学和教育的法律监管方法。作者认为制定科学与创新法典的先决条件是:现有科学与创新监管法律行为的多样性和不一致性;科学法律规制缺乏统一的思想基础;提高科技法治领域的科学发展水平;考虑到科学和技术法律法规的具体情况;增加法律规制研究领域的重要性;制定了成熟的国家科技政策。最后,作者提出了科学和创新法典的结构,并指出,法典可以在俄罗斯联邦发展和管理科学的意识形态的发展中占有应有的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Code of Laws on Science and Innovations of the Russian Federation: Concept and Structure
The article analyzes the idea of separating scientific concepts aimed at studying the legal regulation of scientific activity, emphasizes the relevance of the ongoing research in that, as of today, there is no balanced legislative regulation of scientific and innovative activities. The research methodology is represented by general scientific methods and special legal methods of study. Thus, the logical method made it possible to highlight the prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation. The historical method contributed to the historical and legal analysis of the development of the idea of forming a unified law on scientific and innovative activities. The modeling method made it possible to form the optimal structure of the draft code of laws on science and innovation. Using the formal legal method, the analysis of the current legislation and doctrinal approaches to the legal regulation of science and education was carried out. The authors identify the following prerequisites for the development of a code of laws on science and innovation: the multiplicity and inconsistency of existing regulatory legal acts on science and innovation; lack of a unified ideological basis for the legal regulation of science; increasing the level of scientific development of the scientific and legal sphere; taking into account the specifics of scientific and technical legal regulation; increasing the importance of the studied sphere of legal regulation; development of a mature state scientific and technical policy. In conclusion, the authors propose the structure of the code of laws on science and innovation, it is noted that the code can take its rightful place in the development of an ideology for the development and management of science in the Russian Federation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1