从韦伯的凯撒主义范畴理解“新土耳其”

Banu Turnaoğlu, E. Keyman
{"title":"从韦伯的凯撒主义范畴理解“新土耳其”","authors":"Banu Turnaoğlu, E. Keyman","doi":"10.1353/max.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article aims to expand upon our understanding of the historical dynamics of Weber's central but relatively underexplored category of Caesarism by showcasing its operation within contemporary Turkish politics. We illustrate how the shift from a parliamentarian to a presidential system, bestowing Turkish premier Erdoğan with unrestrained executive powers, has manifested a type of 'pure', unrestrained Caesarism that Weber associated with and criticized in Otto von Bismarck. Yet, reflecting Weber's optimism that strong parliamentarism could remedy the threats of authoritarianism, we also argue that it is possible to reverse today's negative politics in Turkey towards re-democratization. Deploying the Weberian concept of Caesarism and other related notions drawn from Weber's thought, such as parliamentarism, charisma, and plebiscitary democracy and politics, demonstrates the relevance of this category today, helps us better understand the contemporary Turkish climate, and offers pathways for its future political revitalization.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the 'New Turkey' through Max Weber's category of Caesarism\",\"authors\":\"Banu Turnaoğlu, E. Keyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/max.2022.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article aims to expand upon our understanding of the historical dynamics of Weber's central but relatively underexplored category of Caesarism by showcasing its operation within contemporary Turkish politics. We illustrate how the shift from a parliamentarian to a presidential system, bestowing Turkish premier Erdoğan with unrestrained executive powers, has manifested a type of 'pure', unrestrained Caesarism that Weber associated with and criticized in Otto von Bismarck. Yet, reflecting Weber's optimism that strong parliamentarism could remedy the threats of authoritarianism, we also argue that it is possible to reverse today's negative politics in Turkey towards re-democratization. Deploying the Weberian concept of Caesarism and other related notions drawn from Weber's thought, such as parliamentarism, charisma, and plebiscitary democracy and politics, demonstrates the relevance of this category today, helps us better understand the contemporary Turkish climate, and offers pathways for its future political revitalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2022.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文旨在通过展示凯撒主义在当代土耳其政治中的运作,扩大我们对韦伯的核心但相对未被充分探索的凯撒主义类别的历史动态的理解。我们说明了从议会制度到总统制的转变,赋予土耳其总理Erdoğan不受约束的行政权力,如何体现了一种“纯粹的”、不受约束的凯撒主义,韦伯与奥托·冯·俾斯麦(Otto von Bismarck)联系在一起并对其进行了批评。然而,韦伯乐观地认为,强大的议会制可以补救威权主义的威胁,我们也认为,有可能扭转土耳其今天的消极政治走向重新民主化。运用韦伯的凯撒主义概念以及从韦伯思想中提取的其他相关概念,如议会制、魅力、公民投票民主和政治,展示了这一类别在今天的相关性,有助于我们更好地理解当代土耳其的气候,并为其未来的政治复兴提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the 'New Turkey' through Max Weber's category of Caesarism
Abstract:This article aims to expand upon our understanding of the historical dynamics of Weber's central but relatively underexplored category of Caesarism by showcasing its operation within contemporary Turkish politics. We illustrate how the shift from a parliamentarian to a presidential system, bestowing Turkish premier Erdoğan with unrestrained executive powers, has manifested a type of 'pure', unrestrained Caesarism that Weber associated with and criticized in Otto von Bismarck. Yet, reflecting Weber's optimism that strong parliamentarism could remedy the threats of authoritarianism, we also argue that it is possible to reverse today's negative politics in Turkey towards re-democratization. Deploying the Weberian concept of Caesarism and other related notions drawn from Weber's thought, such as parliamentarism, charisma, and plebiscitary democracy and politics, demonstrates the relevance of this category today, helps us better understand the contemporary Turkish climate, and offers pathways for its future political revitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1