基于家庭的远程医疗系统在人力资源管理中的评估

Morteza Taymoori, Mahsa Hossein Khanli
{"title":"基于家庭的远程医疗系统在人力资源管理中的评估","authors":"Morteza Taymoori, Mahsa Hossein Khanli","doi":"10.24200/JMAS.VOL8ISS4PP18-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine is essentially “the use of information and telecommunications technologies to provide and support health care services when distance separates the participants. Many product developments have taken place resulting in various medical devices becoming commercially available which may form part of a telemedicine solution. To foster user acceptance of telemedicine technologies, it is important for healthcare consumers to have a positive attitude toward using such systems. A key factor that influence user acceptance is the usability of the telemedicine system. It is critical, for real-world applicability to situate telemedicine applications within the context-specific needs of the people benefiting from or otherwise affected by them. Limited research is conducted in evaluating the usability of such tools from a home based video telemedicine system perspective has been conducted. To address this situation, this study investigates the usability issues associated with four home-based telemedicine software platforms using task performance metrics, and subjective measures. At-home telemedicine visits are quickly becoming an acceptable alternative for in-person patient visits. However, little work has been done to understand the usability of these home-based telemedicine solutions. It is critical for user acceptance and real-world applicability to evaluate available telemedicine solutions within the context-specific needs of the users of this technology. To address this need, this study evaluated the usability of four home-based telemedicine software platforms: Doxy.me, Vidyo,VSee, and Polycom. Statistically significant differences among the telemedicine software platforms were found for task completion time, total workload, mental demand, effort, frustration, preference ranking and computer system usability scores. Usability problems with installation and account creation led to high mental demand and task completion time, suggesting the participants preferred a system without such requirements. Majority of the usability issues were identified at the telemedicine initiation phase. The findings from this study can be used by software developers to develop user-friendly telemedicine systems.","PeriodicalId":370173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Home-Based Telemedicine Systems in human resourse management\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Taymoori, Mahsa Hossein Khanli\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/JMAS.VOL8ISS4PP18-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Telemedicine is essentially “the use of information and telecommunications technologies to provide and support health care services when distance separates the participants. Many product developments have taken place resulting in various medical devices becoming commercially available which may form part of a telemedicine solution. To foster user acceptance of telemedicine technologies, it is important for healthcare consumers to have a positive attitude toward using such systems. A key factor that influence user acceptance is the usability of the telemedicine system. It is critical, for real-world applicability to situate telemedicine applications within the context-specific needs of the people benefiting from or otherwise affected by them. Limited research is conducted in evaluating the usability of such tools from a home based video telemedicine system perspective has been conducted. To address this situation, this study investigates the usability issues associated with four home-based telemedicine software platforms using task performance metrics, and subjective measures. At-home telemedicine visits are quickly becoming an acceptable alternative for in-person patient visits. However, little work has been done to understand the usability of these home-based telemedicine solutions. It is critical for user acceptance and real-world applicability to evaluate available telemedicine solutions within the context-specific needs of the users of this technology. To address this need, this study evaluated the usability of four home-based telemedicine software platforms: Doxy.me, Vidyo,VSee, and Polycom. Statistically significant differences among the telemedicine software platforms were found for task completion time, total workload, mental demand, effort, frustration, preference ranking and computer system usability scores. Usability problems with installation and account creation led to high mental demand and task completion time, suggesting the participants preferred a system without such requirements. Majority of the usability issues were identified at the telemedicine initiation phase. The findings from this study can be used by software developers to develop user-friendly telemedicine systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/JMAS.VOL8ISS4PP18-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/JMAS.VOL8ISS4PP18-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程医疗本质上是"利用信息和电信技术,在参与者相距遥远的情况下提供和支持保健服务。已经进行了许多产品开发,导致各种医疗设备商业化,这些设备可能构成远程医疗解决方案的一部分。为了促进用户接受远程医疗技术,医疗保健消费者对使用此类系统持积极态度是很重要的。影响用户接受度的一个关键因素是远程医疗系统的可用性。对于现实世界的适用性来说,将远程医疗应用置于受益或受其影响的人的特定环境需求中是至关重要的。从基于家庭的视频远程医疗系统的角度评估这些工具的可用性进行了有限的研究。为了解决这一问题,本研究使用任务性能指标和主观测量方法调查了四种家庭远程医疗软件平台的可用性问题。家庭远程医疗访问正在迅速成为一种可接受的替代面对面的病人访问。然而,在了解这些基于家庭的远程医疗解决方案的可用性方面所做的工作很少。根据该技术用户的特定环境需求评估可用的远程医疗解决方案,这对于用户接受度和实际适用性至关重要。为了满足这一需求,本研究评估了四个家庭远程医疗软件平台的可用性:Doxy。我,Vidyo,VSee和Polycom。各远程医疗软件平台在任务完成时间、总工作量、心理需求、努力程度、挫败感、偏好排名和计算机系统可用性得分方面存在显著差异。安装和创建帐户的可用性问题导致高脑力需求和任务完成时间,这表明参与者更喜欢没有这些要求的系统。大多数可用性问题是在远程医疗启动阶段确定的。本研究结果可供软体开发人员使用,以开发用户友好的远端医疗系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Home-Based Telemedicine Systems in human resourse management
Telemedicine is essentially “the use of information and telecommunications technologies to provide and support health care services when distance separates the participants. Many product developments have taken place resulting in various medical devices becoming commercially available which may form part of a telemedicine solution. To foster user acceptance of telemedicine technologies, it is important for healthcare consumers to have a positive attitude toward using such systems. A key factor that influence user acceptance is the usability of the telemedicine system. It is critical, for real-world applicability to situate telemedicine applications within the context-specific needs of the people benefiting from or otherwise affected by them. Limited research is conducted in evaluating the usability of such tools from a home based video telemedicine system perspective has been conducted. To address this situation, this study investigates the usability issues associated with four home-based telemedicine software platforms using task performance metrics, and subjective measures. At-home telemedicine visits are quickly becoming an acceptable alternative for in-person patient visits. However, little work has been done to understand the usability of these home-based telemedicine solutions. It is critical for user acceptance and real-world applicability to evaluate available telemedicine solutions within the context-specific needs of the users of this technology. To address this need, this study evaluated the usability of four home-based telemedicine software platforms: Doxy.me, Vidyo,VSee, and Polycom. Statistically significant differences among the telemedicine software platforms were found for task completion time, total workload, mental demand, effort, frustration, preference ranking and computer system usability scores. Usability problems with installation and account creation led to high mental demand and task completion time, suggesting the participants preferred a system without such requirements. Majority of the usability issues were identified at the telemedicine initiation phase. The findings from this study can be used by software developers to develop user-friendly telemedicine systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Validity of Altman’s Models in Predicting Iraqi Private-Banks Soundness The Role of Leaders’ Moral Intelligence to Enhance Strategic Leadership Investigating the relationship between cross-sectional free cash flows, dividends and corporate value Investigation the Factors that Affect Intention to Use Informational Technology among Payame Noor University Students (English Language) at Fars Province Investigating the relationship between management forecasting of profits and management incentives with managers' risk-taking in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1