{"title":"为进化心理学辩护:回复甘农","authors":"A. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/14616661.2002.10383128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gannon's critique of evolutionary psychology contains a number of misunderstandings which the present article attempts to rectify. These include the difference between natural and sexual selection, the unit of selection, genetic drift, different forms of systematic selection, the meaning of the term optimality, the working definition of an adaptation and the role of modularity. Gannon encourages consideration of the role of experience in contributing to the unique phenotype of every individual. The ways in which evolutionary psychologists have addressed this issue are discussed.","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"2022 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A defence of evolutionary psychology: Reply to Gannon\",\"authors\":\"A. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14616661.2002.10383128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Gannon's critique of evolutionary psychology contains a number of misunderstandings which the present article attempts to rectify. These include the difference between natural and sexual selection, the unit of selection, genetic drift, different forms of systematic selection, the meaning of the term optimality, the working definition of an adaptation and the role of modularity. Gannon encourages consideration of the role of experience in contributing to the unique phenotype of every individual. The ways in which evolutionary psychologists have addressed this issue are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology, Evolution & Gender\",\"volume\":\"2022 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology, Evolution & Gender\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616661.2002.10383128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616661.2002.10383128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A defence of evolutionary psychology: Reply to Gannon
Abstract Gannon's critique of evolutionary psychology contains a number of misunderstandings which the present article attempts to rectify. These include the difference between natural and sexual selection, the unit of selection, genetic drift, different forms of systematic selection, the meaning of the term optimality, the working definition of an adaptation and the role of modularity. Gannon encourages consideration of the role of experience in contributing to the unique phenotype of every individual. The ways in which evolutionary psychologists have addressed this issue are discussed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
