{"title":"用于卡开和延迟测试的BIST测试模式生成器","authors":"Chih-Ang Chen, S. Gupta","doi":"10.1109/EDTC.1994.326862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing for delay and CMOS stuck-open faults requires two pattern tests and test sets are usually large. Built-in self-test (BIST) schemes are attractive for such comprehensive testing. The BIST test pattern generators (TPGs) for such testing should be designed to ensure high pattern-pair coverage. In this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions to ensure complete/maximal pattern-pair coverage for linear feedback shift register (LFSR) and cellular automata (CA) have been derived. The theory developed here identifies all LFSR/CA TPGs which maximize pattern-pair coverage under any given TPG size constraints. It is shown that LFSRs with primitive feedback polynomials with large number of terms are better for two-pattern testing. Also, CA are shown to be better TPGs than LFSRs for two-pattern testing. Results derived in this paper provide practical algorithms for the design of optimal TPGs for two-pattern testing. Experiments on some benchmark circuits indicate the TPGs designed using the procedures outlined in this paper provide much higher delay fault coverage than other TPGs.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":244297,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference EDAC-ETC-EUROASIC","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BIST test pattern generators for stuck-open and delay testing\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Ang Chen, S. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDTC.1994.326862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Testing for delay and CMOS stuck-open faults requires two pattern tests and test sets are usually large. Built-in self-test (BIST) schemes are attractive for such comprehensive testing. The BIST test pattern generators (TPGs) for such testing should be designed to ensure high pattern-pair coverage. In this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions to ensure complete/maximal pattern-pair coverage for linear feedback shift register (LFSR) and cellular automata (CA) have been derived. The theory developed here identifies all LFSR/CA TPGs which maximize pattern-pair coverage under any given TPG size constraints. It is shown that LFSRs with primitive feedback polynomials with large number of terms are better for two-pattern testing. Also, CA are shown to be better TPGs than LFSRs for two-pattern testing. Results derived in this paper provide practical algorithms for the design of optimal TPGs for two-pattern testing. Experiments on some benchmark circuits indicate the TPGs designed using the procedures outlined in this paper provide much higher delay fault coverage than other TPGs.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":244297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference EDAC-ETC-EUROASIC\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference EDAC-ETC-EUROASIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDTC.1994.326862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of European Design and Test Conference EDAC-ETC-EUROASIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDTC.1994.326862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
BIST test pattern generators for stuck-open and delay testing
Testing for delay and CMOS stuck-open faults requires two pattern tests and test sets are usually large. Built-in self-test (BIST) schemes are attractive for such comprehensive testing. The BIST test pattern generators (TPGs) for such testing should be designed to ensure high pattern-pair coverage. In this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions to ensure complete/maximal pattern-pair coverage for linear feedback shift register (LFSR) and cellular automata (CA) have been derived. The theory developed here identifies all LFSR/CA TPGs which maximize pattern-pair coverage under any given TPG size constraints. It is shown that LFSRs with primitive feedback polynomials with large number of terms are better for two-pattern testing. Also, CA are shown to be better TPGs than LFSRs for two-pattern testing. Results derived in this paper provide practical algorithms for the design of optimal TPGs for two-pattern testing. Experiments on some benchmark circuits indicate the TPGs designed using the procedures outlined in this paper provide much higher delay fault coverage than other TPGs.<>