奥孙州高中生Waec和Neco化学题数正确和题型评分方法的比较分析

Temitope Babatimehin, Adamu Chidubem Deborah, Adeoye Oluseyi Peter
{"title":"奥孙州高中生Waec和Neco化学题数正确和题型评分方法的比较分析","authors":"Temitope Babatimehin, Adamu Chidubem Deborah, Adeoye Oluseyi Peter","doi":"10.17220/tuara.2021.01.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study determined the unidimensionality using Item Response Theory (IRT) also compared the number correct and item pattern scoring methods of Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) examinee estimated scores from WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State, Nigeria. This is with the view of providing empirical explanation on the appropriateness of decisions made statistically from examinee scores using classical test and item response theory approaches. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. A sample of 1,105 students was randomly selected from a population of 36,182 students who sat for the 2017/2018 SSCE chemistry paper 1 in Osun State. An adopted version of June/July 2015 NECO (Type 1) and May/June 2015 WAEC (Type 2) SSCE Chemistry (Objective) Paper 1 titled Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) were utilized for data collection. Data collected were analyzed using STEU implemented in DIMTEST mean, standard deviation, paired sampled t-test, MIRT and equate IRT packages of R language. The results showed that the traits measured by the two groups of items were significantly different from one another (multidimensionality). Also, results showed that IRT (item pattern) scoring method has significant effect on the examinees scores in WCI (t = 13.06, p < 0.05) and NCI (t = 7.667, p < 0.05) than CTT (number correct) scoring method. In conclusion, the study established that there is no statistical equivalence between IRT (item pattern) and CTT (number correct) scoring method on WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State.","PeriodicalId":315640,"journal":{"name":"The Universal Academic Research Journal","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Number Correct and Item Pattern Scoring Methods for Waec and Neco Chemistry Items Among Senior Secondary Students in Osun State\",\"authors\":\"Temitope Babatimehin, Adamu Chidubem Deborah, Adeoye Oluseyi Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.17220/tuara.2021.01.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study determined the unidimensionality using Item Response Theory (IRT) also compared the number correct and item pattern scoring methods of Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) examinee estimated scores from WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State, Nigeria. This is with the view of providing empirical explanation on the appropriateness of decisions made statistically from examinee scores using classical test and item response theory approaches. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. A sample of 1,105 students was randomly selected from a population of 36,182 students who sat for the 2017/2018 SSCE chemistry paper 1 in Osun State. An adopted version of June/July 2015 NECO (Type 1) and May/June 2015 WAEC (Type 2) SSCE Chemistry (Objective) Paper 1 titled Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) were utilized for data collection. Data collected were analyzed using STEU implemented in DIMTEST mean, standard deviation, paired sampled t-test, MIRT and equate IRT packages of R language. The results showed that the traits measured by the two groups of items were significantly different from one another (multidimensionality). Also, results showed that IRT (item pattern) scoring method has significant effect on the examinees scores in WCI (t = 13.06, p < 0.05) and NCI (t = 7.667, p < 0.05) than CTT (number correct) scoring method. In conclusion, the study established that there is no statistical equivalence between IRT (item pattern) and CTT (number correct) scoring method on WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Universal Academic Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"196 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Universal Academic Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17220/tuara.2021.01.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Universal Academic Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17220/tuara.2021.01.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究运用项目反应理论(IRT)确定了单维性,并比较了尼日利亚奥逊州高中毕业证书考试(SSCE)考生WAEC和NECO化学项目估计分数的正确率和项目模式评分方法。这是为了使用经典测试和项目反应理论方法对从考生分数中做出的统计决策的适当性提供实证解释。本研究采用描述性调查设计。从参加奥松州2017/2018年SSCE化学试卷1的36182名学生中随机抽取了1105名学生。采用2015年6月/ 7月NECO (Type 1)和2015年5月/ 6月WAEC (Type 2) SSCE化学(Objective) Paper 1题为化学成就测试(CAT)的版本进行数据收集。收集的数据使用STEU进行分析,采用R语言的DIMTEST均值、标准差、配对抽样t检验、MIRT和等量IRT包。结果表明,两组项目测量的特征存在显著性差异(多维度)。此外,IRT(项目模式)计分法对WCI (t = 13.06, p < 0.05)和NCI (t = 7.667, p < 0.05)的影响显著高于CTT(数字正确)计分法。综上所述,本研究确定了奥孙州WAEC和NECO化学项目的IRT(项目模式)评分法和CTT(数字正确)评分法在统计上不存在等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Number Correct and Item Pattern Scoring Methods for Waec and Neco Chemistry Items Among Senior Secondary Students in Osun State
The study determined the unidimensionality using Item Response Theory (IRT) also compared the number correct and item pattern scoring methods of Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) examinee estimated scores from WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State, Nigeria. This is with the view of providing empirical explanation on the appropriateness of decisions made statistically from examinee scores using classical test and item response theory approaches. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. A sample of 1,105 students was randomly selected from a population of 36,182 students who sat for the 2017/2018 SSCE chemistry paper 1 in Osun State. An adopted version of June/July 2015 NECO (Type 1) and May/June 2015 WAEC (Type 2) SSCE Chemistry (Objective) Paper 1 titled Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) were utilized for data collection. Data collected were analyzed using STEU implemented in DIMTEST mean, standard deviation, paired sampled t-test, MIRT and equate IRT packages of R language. The results showed that the traits measured by the two groups of items were significantly different from one another (multidimensionality). Also, results showed that IRT (item pattern) scoring method has significant effect on the examinees scores in WCI (t = 13.06, p < 0.05) and NCI (t = 7.667, p < 0.05) than CTT (number correct) scoring method. In conclusion, the study established that there is no statistical equivalence between IRT (item pattern) and CTT (number correct) scoring method on WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining School Satisfaction in Adolescents: The Role of Academic Perfectionism and Meaning in Life Organizational Effects of the Hubris Syndrome and the Ways of Solution Content Analysis of STEM-Oriented Studies in Science Education: 2017-2021 İlkokul Öğrencilerinin Farklı Yazı Türlerinde Yaptıkları Yazma Hatalarının Belirlenmesi: Bir Durum Çalışması Critical Thinking Disposition And Student Individual Responsibility As Predictors Of Social Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1