{"title":"低压电路设计中异或单元结构的分析与比较","authors":"S. Nishizawa, T. Ishihara, H. Onodera","doi":"10.1109/ISQED.2013.6523687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of standard cells has a strong impact on the performance of a circuit synthesized with the cells. Although a complementary CMOS logic is usually used in the standard cells, it is known that a pass transistor logic can improve the performance of a circuit with a smaller area in some cases. We evaluate different types of XOR cells in different voltage conditions. Results show that the dual pass transistor XOR has a better performance than the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation, while the complementary CMOS XOR has a better performance in 1.2 V operation. More specifically, the area and the power consumption of a benchmark circuit composed of the dual pass transistor XOR can be reduced by 24% and 35%, respectively, compared to those of the same circuit composed of the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation.","PeriodicalId":127115,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","volume":"553 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and comparison of XOR cell structures for low voltage circuit design\",\"authors\":\"S. Nishizawa, T. Ishihara, H. Onodera\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISQED.2013.6523687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The performance of standard cells has a strong impact on the performance of a circuit synthesized with the cells. Although a complementary CMOS logic is usually used in the standard cells, it is known that a pass transistor logic can improve the performance of a circuit with a smaller area in some cases. We evaluate different types of XOR cells in different voltage conditions. Results show that the dual pass transistor XOR has a better performance than the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation, while the complementary CMOS XOR has a better performance in 1.2 V operation. More specifically, the area and the power consumption of a benchmark circuit composed of the dual pass transistor XOR can be reduced by 24% and 35%, respectively, compared to those of the same circuit composed of the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)\",\"volume\":\"553 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2013.6523687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2013.6523687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis and comparison of XOR cell structures for low voltage circuit design
The performance of standard cells has a strong impact on the performance of a circuit synthesized with the cells. Although a complementary CMOS logic is usually used in the standard cells, it is known that a pass transistor logic can improve the performance of a circuit with a smaller area in some cases. We evaluate different types of XOR cells in different voltage conditions. Results show that the dual pass transistor XOR has a better performance than the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation, while the complementary CMOS XOR has a better performance in 1.2 V operation. More specifically, the area and the power consumption of a benchmark circuit composed of the dual pass transistor XOR can be reduced by 24% and 35%, respectively, compared to those of the same circuit composed of the complementary CMOS XOR in 0.6V operation.