轴向与同轴磁力联轴器的对比分析

Y. Akcay, P. Giangrande, C. Gerada, M. Galea
{"title":"轴向与同轴磁力联轴器的对比分析","authors":"Y. Akcay, P. Giangrande, C. Gerada, M. Galea","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of magnetic couplings enables the transmission of mechanical power relying on the magnetic fields interaction rather than a physical mechanical connection. Hence, the contactless speed/torque transmission leads to improvements in terms of efficiency and reliability, due to the absence of wear out between moving parts. For a specific application, the most appropriate magnetic coupling configuration (i.e. axial or coaxial) is usually identified through a trade-off study. In this paper, a comparative analysis between axial and coaxial magnetic couplings is presented using a two-dimensional subdomain approach. Based on a full-parametric geometry, two 2D analytical tools are developed for each magnetic coupling configuration. These analytical tools are validated against finite element results in order to prove their effectiveness. Finally, the implemented models are used to investigate the impact of parameters, such as permanent magnet span, airgap thickness and number of pole-pairs, on the maximum static torque.","PeriodicalId":188371,"journal":{"name":"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AXIAL AND COAXIAL MAGNETIC COUPLINGS\",\"authors\":\"Y. Akcay, P. Giangrande, C. Gerada, M. Galea\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/icp.2021.1147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of magnetic couplings enables the transmission of mechanical power relying on the magnetic fields interaction rather than a physical mechanical connection. Hence, the contactless speed/torque transmission leads to improvements in terms of efficiency and reliability, due to the absence of wear out between moving parts. For a specific application, the most appropriate magnetic coupling configuration (i.e. axial or coaxial) is usually identified through a trade-off study. In this paper, a comparative analysis between axial and coaxial magnetic couplings is presented using a two-dimensional subdomain approach. Based on a full-parametric geometry, two 2D analytical tools are developed for each magnetic coupling configuration. These analytical tools are validated against finite element results in order to prove their effectiveness. Finally, the implemented models are used to investigate the impact of parameters, such as permanent magnet span, airgap thickness and number of pole-pairs, on the maximum static torque.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

磁联轴器的采用使机械动力的传递依靠磁场的相互作用,而不是物理的机械连接。因此,由于运动部件之间没有磨损,非接触式速度/扭矩传输导致效率和可靠性的提高。对于特定的应用,最合适的磁耦合配置(即轴向或同轴)通常是通过权衡研究确定的。本文采用二维子域方法对轴向和同轴磁联轴器进行了比较分析。基于全参数几何,开发了两个二维分析工具,用于每种磁耦合结构。为了证明这些分析工具的有效性,对有限元结果进行了验证。最后,利用实现的模型研究了永磁体跨度、气隙厚度和极对数等参数对最大静转矩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AXIAL AND COAXIAL MAGNETIC COUPLINGS
The adoption of magnetic couplings enables the transmission of mechanical power relying on the magnetic fields interaction rather than a physical mechanical connection. Hence, the contactless speed/torque transmission leads to improvements in terms of efficiency and reliability, due to the absence of wear out between moving parts. For a specific application, the most appropriate magnetic coupling configuration (i.e. axial or coaxial) is usually identified through a trade-off study. In this paper, a comparative analysis between axial and coaxial magnetic couplings is presented using a two-dimensional subdomain approach. Based on a full-parametric geometry, two 2D analytical tools are developed for each magnetic coupling configuration. These analytical tools are validated against finite element results in order to prove their effectiveness. Finally, the implemented models are used to investigate the impact of parameters, such as permanent magnet span, airgap thickness and number of pole-pairs, on the maximum static torque.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A NEW FOUR-QUADRANT INVERTER BASED ON DUAL-WINDING ISOLATED CUK CONVERTERS FOR RAILWAY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY APPLICATIONS PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION USING LOW-ORDER LUMPED-PARAMETER THERMAL NETWORK WITH EXTENDED IRON LOSS MODEL THERMAL DC TEST AND ANALYSIS OF A STATOR MADE WITH RESIN TRICKLE IMPREGNATION OPTIMISATION OF THE GATE VOLTAGE IN SiC MOSFETS: EFFICIENCY VS RELIABILITY AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THERMAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR IGBT MODULES IN ELECTRICAL DRIVETRAINS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1