一种实用的数值推进试验方法的评价

Andreas Giannoulis, K. Halse
{"title":"一种实用的数值推进试验方法的评价","authors":"Andreas Giannoulis, K. Halse","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Prediction of resistance and propulsion characteristics for a ship is among the most important steps in a ship design process. Traditionally, model tests are used for these predictions and the results are extrapolated to the full-scale ship. Model test techniques can provide reasonably accurate results, but the cost and time they require — and the unavoidable scaling issues — have lead Naval Architects to look for other alternatives.\n With the increasing computer power and the increasing experience with numerical simulation of fluid flow, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) have become an appealing alternative to model tests. Numerical computations will always be a trade-off between computational efforts and numerical accuracy. Typically, increased accuracy requirements will cause the mesh to be very fine, and hence the computational time will increase.\n At a Workshop on numerical simulation of full-scale ships in Southampton in November 2016, a practical approach for predicting the propulsion characteristics of a full-scale ship was introduced by participants from Becker Marine Systems. The pragmatic CFD approach reduced the computational efforts without scarifying the level of accuracy! In the present work, the alternative practical CFD approach is evaluated in a model scale case to study its benefits and possible short-comings compared to conventional CFD simulations of the self-propulsion case.","PeriodicalId":345141,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","volume":"705 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Practical Approach for Numerical Propulsion Tests\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Giannoulis, K. Halse\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-95339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Prediction of resistance and propulsion characteristics for a ship is among the most important steps in a ship design process. Traditionally, model tests are used for these predictions and the results are extrapolated to the full-scale ship. Model test techniques can provide reasonably accurate results, but the cost and time they require — and the unavoidable scaling issues — have lead Naval Architects to look for other alternatives.\\n With the increasing computer power and the increasing experience with numerical simulation of fluid flow, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) have become an appealing alternative to model tests. Numerical computations will always be a trade-off between computational efforts and numerical accuracy. Typically, increased accuracy requirements will cause the mesh to be very fine, and hence the computational time will increase.\\n At a Workshop on numerical simulation of full-scale ships in Southampton in November 2016, a practical approach for predicting the propulsion characteristics of a full-scale ship was introduced by participants from Becker Marine Systems. The pragmatic CFD approach reduced the computational efforts without scarifying the level of accuracy! In the present work, the alternative practical CFD approach is evaluated in a model scale case to study its benefits and possible short-comings compared to conventional CFD simulations of the self-propulsion case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: CFD and FSI\",\"volume\":\"705 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: CFD and FSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

船舶阻力和推进特性的预测是船舶设计过程中最重要的步骤之一。传统上,模型试验用于这些预测,并将结果外推到全尺寸船舶。模型测试技术可以提供相当准确的结果,但是它们所需要的成本和时间——以及不可避免的缩放问题——迫使海军建筑师寻找其他替代方案。随着计算机能力的提高和对流体流动数值模拟经验的增加,计算流体动力学(CFD)已成为模型试验的一种有吸引力的替代方法。数值计算总是在计算努力和数值精度之间进行权衡。通常,提高精度要求将导致网格非常精细,因此计算时间将增加。2016年11月,在南安普敦举行的全尺寸船舶数值模拟研讨会上,来自Becker Marine Systems的参与者介绍了一种预测全尺寸船舶推进特性的实用方法。实用的CFD方法在不降低精度的情况下减少了计算工作量!在本工作中,在模型尺度的情况下评估了替代的实用CFD方法,以研究其与传统的自推进情况的CFD模拟相比的优点和可能的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a Practical Approach for Numerical Propulsion Tests
Prediction of resistance and propulsion characteristics for a ship is among the most important steps in a ship design process. Traditionally, model tests are used for these predictions and the results are extrapolated to the full-scale ship. Model test techniques can provide reasonably accurate results, but the cost and time they require — and the unavoidable scaling issues — have lead Naval Architects to look for other alternatives. With the increasing computer power and the increasing experience with numerical simulation of fluid flow, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) have become an appealing alternative to model tests. Numerical computations will always be a trade-off between computational efforts and numerical accuracy. Typically, increased accuracy requirements will cause the mesh to be very fine, and hence the computational time will increase. At a Workshop on numerical simulation of full-scale ships in Southampton in November 2016, a practical approach for predicting the propulsion characteristics of a full-scale ship was introduced by participants from Becker Marine Systems. The pragmatic CFD approach reduced the computational efforts without scarifying the level of accuracy! In the present work, the alternative practical CFD approach is evaluated in a model scale case to study its benefits and possible short-comings compared to conventional CFD simulations of the self-propulsion case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of CFD Analysis Procedure for Predicting Wind Load on Commercial Ships Multi-Phase Simulation of Droplet Trajectories of Wave-Impact Sea Spray Over a Vessel Numerical Study of Breaking Waves and Associated Wave Forces on a Jacket Substructure for Offshore Wind Turbines Numerical Simulation of Trim Optimization on Resistance Performance Based on CFD Method Fundamental CFD Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of the DARPA SUBOFF Submarine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1