E. C. Wenno, Kalvin Karuna
{"title":"HOTS (HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL) DALAM TES BAHASA JERMAN","authors":"E. C. Wenno, Kalvin Karuna","doi":"10.30598/j-edu.1.1.17-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In learning, students are trained to reason, analyze and evaluate to find solutions to problems faced. The way to conclude students' achievements in such behavior is a test. This study aims to describe the point of the German question (GER113 Main Problem Package) by asking the question whether the questions fall into the category of HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). This research is a descriptive type of analytical and the object of analysis in this study is a package of German questions used in national examinations. The results showed that the German language test developed by the teacher was still dominated by the question item at a low cognitive level. This conclusion is based on the findings that there are 58.33% of LOTS category questions consisting of 4.16% of the level of wheezing (C1), 16.67% of understanding levels (C2), and 37.5% with applying levels (C3). Then for the HOTS category, there is 41.67% consisting of 37.5% analyze level (C4), 4.17% evaluate level (C5), and 0% creating level (C6).","PeriodicalId":325711,"journal":{"name":"J-EDu: Journal - Erfolgreicher Deutschunterricht","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J-EDu: Journal - Erfolgreicher Deutschunterricht","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30598/j-edu.1.1.17-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在学习中,学生被训练去推理、分析和评估,以找到所面临问题的解决方案。判断学生在这种行为中的成就的方法是测试。本研究旨在通过询问问题是否属于HOTS(高阶思维技能)的范畴来描述德语问题(GER113主要问题包)的要点。本研究为描述性分析类型,本研究的分析对象是国家考试中使用的一揽子德语问题。结果表明,教师开发的德语测试仍以认知水平较低的题项为主。这一结论的依据是,有58.33%的LOTS类题,其中喘息水平(C1)占4.16%,理解水平(C2)占16.67%,应用水平(C3)占37.5%。然后是HOTS类别,由37.5%的分析水平(C4), 4.17%的评估水平(C5)和0%的创造水平(C6)组成的41.67%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HOTS (HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL) DALAM TES BAHASA JERMAN
In learning, students are trained to reason, analyze and evaluate to find solutions to problems faced. The way to conclude students' achievements in such behavior is a test. This study aims to describe the point of the German question (GER113 Main Problem Package) by asking the question whether the questions fall into the category of HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). This research is a descriptive type of analytical and the object of analysis in this study is a package of German questions used in national examinations. The results showed that the German language test developed by the teacher was still dominated by the question item at a low cognitive level. This conclusion is based on the findings that there are 58.33% of LOTS category questions consisting of 4.16% of the level of wheezing (C1), 16.67% of understanding levels (C2), and 37.5% with applying levels (C3). Then for the HOTS category, there is 41.67% consisting of 37.5% analyze level (C4), 4.17% evaluate level (C5), and 0% creating level (C6).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HUBUNGAN ANTARA TINGKAT KECEMASAN DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR DEUTSCH FÜR TOURISMUS II MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA JERMAN PENGARUH PENERAPAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN STATIONLERNEN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR BAHASA JERMAN SISWA SMA NEGERI 2 AMBON HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN STRATEGI METAKOGNITIF DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI TEKS KALIMAT PERINTAH BAHASA JERMAN DAN BAHASA KEI (STUDI ANALISIS KONTRASTIF) Pengaruh Penggunaan Google Jamboard terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Produktive Sprachfertigkeiten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1