亚当·斯密:哲学、科学和社会科学

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures Pub Date : 1978-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S0080443600002594

D. Raphael

{"title":"亚当·斯密:哲学、科学和社会科学","authors":"D. Raphael","doi":"10.1017/S0080443600002594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What darkness was the ‘Enlightenment’ supposed to have removed? The answer is irrational forms of religion. Most of the ‘enlightened’ took the view that revealed religion was irrational and that natural religion could be rational; but some were sceptical about natural religion too. Hume was the most honest and the most penetrating thinker of the latter group. His biographer, Professor E. C. Mossner, is not alone in believing that the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion is ‘his philosophical testament’.","PeriodicalId":322312,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adam Smith: Philosophy, Science, and Social Science\",\"authors\":\"D. Raphael\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0080443600002594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What darkness was the ‘Enlightenment’ supposed to have removed? The answer is irrational forms of religion. Most of the ‘enlightened’ took the view that revealed religion was irrational and that natural religion could be rational; but some were sceptical about natural religion too. Hume was the most honest and the most penetrating thinker of the latter group. His biographer, Professor E. C. Mossner, is not alone in believing that the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion is ‘his philosophical testament’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600002594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080443600002594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

摘要

“启蒙运动”应该消除什么样的黑暗?答案是非理性的宗教形式。大多数“开明”的人认为，启示宗教是非理性的，自然宗教可以是理性的;但也有一些人对自然宗教持怀疑态度。休谟是后者中最诚实、最具洞察力的思想家。他的传记作者E. C. Mossner教授并不是唯一一个相信《关于自然宗教的对话录》是“他的哲学遗嘱”的人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Adam Smith: Philosophy, Science, and Social Science

What darkness was the ‘Enlightenment’ supposed to have removed? The answer is irrational forms of religion. Most of the ‘enlightened’ took the view that revealed religion was irrational and that natural religion could be rational; but some were sceptical about natural religion too. Hume was the most honest and the most penetrating thinker of the latter group. His biographer, Professor E. C. Mossner, is not alone in believing that the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion is ‘his philosophical testament’.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Hume, Newton and ‘the Hill called Difficulty’ Hume as Moralist: a Social Historian's Perspective Diderot: Man and Society Kant and the Sincere Fanatic The Empiricism of Locke and Newton