在国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目中使用循证干预措施改善癌症筛查。

A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller
{"title":"在国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目中使用循证干预措施改善癌症筛查。","authors":"A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nDESIGN\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nSETTING\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nPrimarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nData captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOn average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including \"high overall EBI users,\" \"high provider EBI users,\" \"high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback,\" and \"high client EBI users.\" Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.\",\"authors\":\"A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nTo collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nSETTING\\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP.\\n\\n\\nPARTICIPANTS\\nPrimarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\nData captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOn average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including \\\"high overall EBI users,\\\" \\\"high provider EBI users,\\\" \\\"high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback,\\\" and \\\"high client EBI users.\\\" Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测计划(NBCCEDP)通过11000多家初级保健诊所为低收入、无保险和保险不足的妇女提供癌症筛查。该规划有能力与卫生系统合作,实施循证干预措施(ebi),以增加对所有妇女的筛查。目的收集NBCCEDP受助者EBI使用、EBI评估和相关培训需求的基线数据。疾病控制和预防中心于2013年底在2012年7月至2013年6月期间对NBCCEDP受助人进行了一项基于网络的调查。这是第一次对NBCCEDP受助人的ebi进行系统评估。美国疾病控制与预防中心的NBCCEDP。参与者主要是67个NBCCEDP受助人的项目主管/协调员。主要结果测量收集的数据用于评估5个ebi的实施、评估和相关培训需求。频率和比例被确定。聚类分析确定了NBCCEDP客户和提供者使用EBI模式相似的受助人。结果平均而言,每个受助人对NBCCEDP客户和提供者实施了5个ebi中的4.1个。确定了四个集群,包括“高整体EBI用户”、“高提供商EBI用户”、“没有提供商评估和反馈的高EBI用户”和“高客户EBI用户”。在非nbccedp客户和提供者中,平均只有1.8个ebi被实施。不到一半(n = 32, 47.8%)的受助人对1个或更多ebi进行了过程或结果评估。总体而言,47.6%的受助人报告了面向客户的ebi的高或中等培训需求,而面向提供者的ebi的培训需求为54.3%。结论:NBCCEDP受助机构正在与客户和供应商广泛实施ebi。需要在非NBCCEDP客户/供应商中增加EBI的使用,以扩大NBCCEDP的覆盖范围和影响。受资助者培训和技术援助是整个ebi的必要条件。此外,必须增加受助人对EBI实施过程和结果评估的使用,以便为有效的项目实施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
CONTEXT The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women. OBJECTIVE To collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees. DESIGN The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees. SETTING The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP. PARTICIPANTS Primarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Data captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers. RESULTS On average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including "high overall EBI users," "high provider EBI users," "high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback," and "high client EBI users." Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs. CONCLUSIONS The NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1