A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller
{"title":"在国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目中使用循证干预措施改善癌症筛查。","authors":"A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nDESIGN\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nSETTING\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nPrimarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nData captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOn average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including \"high overall EBI users,\" \"high provider EBI users,\" \"high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback,\" and \"high client EBI users.\" Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.\",\"authors\":\"A. Degroff, Aundrea D. Carter, K. Kenney, Z. Myles, S. Melillo, J. Royalty, Ketra L. Rice, Lindsay Gressard, Jacqueline W. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nTo collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nSETTING\\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP.\\n\\n\\nPARTICIPANTS\\nPrimarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees.\\n\\n\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\nData captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOn average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including \\\"high overall EBI users,\\\" \\\"high provider EBI users,\\\" \\\"high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback,\\\" and \\\"high client EBI users.\\\" Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
CONTEXT
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides cancer screening to low-income, un-, and underinsured women through more than 11 000 primary care clinics. The program is well-positioned to work with health systems to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase screening among all women.
OBJECTIVE
To collect baseline data on EBI use, evaluation of EBIs, and related training needs among NBCCEDP grantees.
DESIGN
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Web-based survey in late 2013 among NBCCEDP grantees for the period July 2012 to June 2013. This was the first systematic assessment of EBIs among NBCCEDP grantees.
SETTING
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's NBCCEDP.
PARTICIPANTS
Primarily program directors/coordinators for all 67 NBCCEDP grantees.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Data captured were used to assess implementation of 5 EBIs, their evaluation, and related training needs. Frequencies and proportions were determined. Cluster analysis identified grantees with similar patterns of EBI use for NBCCEDP clients and providers.
RESULTS
On average, 4.1 of 5 EBIs were implemented per grantee for NBCCEDP clients and providers. Four clusters were identified including "high overall EBI users," "high provider EBI users," "high EBI users with no provider assessment and feedback," and "high client EBI users." Only 1.8 EBIs were implemented, on average, with non-NBCCEDP clients and providers. Fewer than half (n = 32, 47.8%) of grantees conducted process or outcome evaluation of 1 or more EBIs. Overall, 47.6% of grantees reported high or medium training needs for client-oriented EBIs and 54.3% for provider-oriented EBIs.
CONCLUSIONS
The NBCCEDP grantees are implementing EBIs extensively with clients and providers. Increased EBI use among non-NBCCEDP clients/providers is needed to extend the NBCCEDP's reach and impact. Grantee training and technical assistance is necessary across EBIs. In addition, grantees' use of process and outcome evaluation of EBI implementation must be increased to inform effective program implementation.