学术角色模糊:大学组织问题

E. G. S. Pérez, M. C. S. Caraveo
{"title":"学术角色模糊:大学组织问题","authors":"E. G. S. Pérez, M. C. S. Caraveo","doi":"10.17993/3cemp.2020.090444.73-91.eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to identify the presence of role ambiguity in academics, who divide their working hours between teaching and researching, of five areas of knowledge in a university in Mexico This is a study with a quantitative approach, a non-exploratory, transactional, descriptive, and correlational design. The reliability of the instrument used was of 0.93 in Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. The results identified that 80.3% of the sample perceives role ambiguity more strongly on the dimensions of `Job demands´ and `Norms´. Subsequently, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in the perception of role ambiguity on the dimension of `norms´ and the areas of knowledge. Therefore, it is concluded that it is necessary for universities to draw attention to establishing precision and clarity on the normativity related to teaching and researching activities, as well as providing the adequate information regarding the institution’s expectations on job performance.","PeriodicalId":365908,"journal":{"name":"3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role ambiguity in academics: an organizational problematic in universities\",\"authors\":\"E. G. S. Pérez, M. C. S. Caraveo\",\"doi\":\"10.17993/3cemp.2020.090444.73-91.eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to identify the presence of role ambiguity in academics, who divide their working hours between teaching and researching, of five areas of knowledge in a university in Mexico This is a study with a quantitative approach, a non-exploratory, transactional, descriptive, and correlational design. The reliability of the instrument used was of 0.93 in Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. The results identified that 80.3% of the sample perceives role ambiguity more strongly on the dimensions of `Job demands´ and `Norms´. Subsequently, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in the perception of role ambiguity on the dimension of `norms´ and the areas of knowledge. Therefore, it is concluded that it is necessary for universities to draw attention to establishing precision and clarity on the normativity related to teaching and researching activities, as well as providing the adequate information regarding the institution’s expectations on job performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico\",\"volume\":\"171 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2020.090444.73-91.eng\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2020.090444.73-91.eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定墨西哥一所大学五个知识领域的学者中角色模糊的存在,他们将工作时间划分为教学和研究。这是一项采用定量方法,非探索性,事务性,描述性和相关性设计的研究。所用仪器的Cronbach’s Alpha系数的信度为0.93。结果发现,80.3%的样本在“工作要求”和“规范”的维度上更强烈地感知角色模糊性。随后,方差分析(ANOVA)显示,在“规范”维度和知识领域上,角色模糊性的感知存在显著差异。因此,得出的结论是,大学有必要注意建立与教学和研究活动相关的规范性的准确性和清晰度,并提供有关机构对工作绩效期望的充分信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role ambiguity in academics: an organizational problematic in universities
The objective of this study was to identify the presence of role ambiguity in academics, who divide their working hours between teaching and researching, of five areas of knowledge in a university in Mexico This is a study with a quantitative approach, a non-exploratory, transactional, descriptive, and correlational design. The reliability of the instrument used was of 0.93 in Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient. The results identified that 80.3% of the sample perceives role ambiguity more strongly on the dimensions of `Job demands´ and `Norms´. Subsequently, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in the perception of role ambiguity on the dimension of `norms´ and the areas of knowledge. Therefore, it is concluded that it is necessary for universities to draw attention to establishing precision and clarity on the normativity related to teaching and researching activities, as well as providing the adequate information regarding the institution’s expectations on job performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engineering application of BIM in saving water and energy conservation Visualization of computer-supported collaborative learning models in the context of multimodal data analysis The Influence of Using Sustainable Materials on Paving Cost of AL-Kut-Maysan Highway Using Cost-Benefit Analysis Research on E-commerce Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Method Based on PSO-LSTM and Text Mining Research on the development and application of CNN model in mobile payment terminal and blockchain economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1