负荷预测中不同机器学习模型的比较分析

Rashmi Bareth, Matushree Kochar, Anamika Yadav
{"title":"负荷预测中不同机器学习模型的比较分析","authors":"Rashmi Bareth, Matushree Kochar, Anamika Yadav","doi":"10.1109/GlobConHT56829.2023.10087406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Load Forecasting helps the utility to make important decision such as load scheduling, load shedding, etc. The main objective of load forecasting are control, operation and planning of power system. With increasing complexity of power system, the proper choice of machine learning techniques also becomes challenging. This paper presents a comparative analysis of nineteen machine learning models such as Linear Regression, Bagged Tree, Cubic Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression with four different kernel function e.g. Squared-exponential, Rational Quadratic, Exponential, Mattern 3/2, Fine tree, Coarse tree, Quadratic support vector machine, Interaction regression, Medium tree, Robust linear regression, Stepwise linear regression, Linear support vector machine, Fine Gaussian support vector machine, Coarse Gaussian support vector machine, Medium Gaussian support vector machine, and Boosted tree. For short term load forecasting, a dataset of July 2022 of Phata region of Maharashtra, India is considered. The simulation result shows that Exponential Gaussian Process Regression gives the best prediction of load compared to other models. The validation results indicate that it has the lowest RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), MSE (Mean Square Error) MAE(Mean Absolute Error) and their values are 1.2, 1.44 and 0.77 respectively.","PeriodicalId":355921,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies (GlobConHT)","volume":"359 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of different Machine learning Models for Load Forecasting\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Bareth, Matushree Kochar, Anamika Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GlobConHT56829.2023.10087406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Load Forecasting helps the utility to make important decision such as load scheduling, load shedding, etc. The main objective of load forecasting are control, operation and planning of power system. With increasing complexity of power system, the proper choice of machine learning techniques also becomes challenging. This paper presents a comparative analysis of nineteen machine learning models such as Linear Regression, Bagged Tree, Cubic Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression with four different kernel function e.g. Squared-exponential, Rational Quadratic, Exponential, Mattern 3/2, Fine tree, Coarse tree, Quadratic support vector machine, Interaction regression, Medium tree, Robust linear regression, Stepwise linear regression, Linear support vector machine, Fine Gaussian support vector machine, Coarse Gaussian support vector machine, Medium Gaussian support vector machine, and Boosted tree. For short term load forecasting, a dataset of July 2022 of Phata region of Maharashtra, India is considered. The simulation result shows that Exponential Gaussian Process Regression gives the best prediction of load compared to other models. The validation results indicate that it has the lowest RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), MSE (Mean Square Error) MAE(Mean Absolute Error) and their values are 1.2, 1.44 and 0.77 respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies (GlobConHT)\",\"volume\":\"359 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies (GlobConHT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobConHT56829.2023.10087406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies (GlobConHT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobConHT56829.2023.10087406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

负荷预测有助于电力公司做出重要的决策,如负荷调度、减载等。负荷预测的主要目标是电力系统的控制、运行和规划。随着电力系统的日益复杂,机器学习技术的正确选择也变得具有挑战性。本文比较分析了19种机器学习模型,如线性回归、袋树、三次支持向量机、高斯过程回归等四种不同的核函数,如平方指数、有理二次、指数、matn 3/2、细树、粗树、二次支持向量机、交互回归、中等树、鲁棒线性回归、逐步线性回归、线性支持向量机。细高斯支持向量机,粗高斯支持向量机,中高斯支持向量机,提升树。对于短期负荷预测,考虑了2022年7月印度马哈拉施特拉邦帕塔地区的数据集。仿真结果表明,与其他模型相比,指数高斯过程回归模型对负荷的预测效果最好。验证结果表明,该方法具有最低的均方根误差(RMSE)、均方根误差(MSE)和绝对误差(MAE),分别为1.2、1.44和0.77。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of different Machine learning Models for Load Forecasting
Load Forecasting helps the utility to make important decision such as load scheduling, load shedding, etc. The main objective of load forecasting are control, operation and planning of power system. With increasing complexity of power system, the proper choice of machine learning techniques also becomes challenging. This paper presents a comparative analysis of nineteen machine learning models such as Linear Regression, Bagged Tree, Cubic Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression with four different kernel function e.g. Squared-exponential, Rational Quadratic, Exponential, Mattern 3/2, Fine tree, Coarse tree, Quadratic support vector machine, Interaction regression, Medium tree, Robust linear regression, Stepwise linear regression, Linear support vector machine, Fine Gaussian support vector machine, Coarse Gaussian support vector machine, Medium Gaussian support vector machine, and Boosted tree. For short term load forecasting, a dataset of July 2022 of Phata region of Maharashtra, India is considered. The simulation result shows that Exponential Gaussian Process Regression gives the best prediction of load compared to other models. The validation results indicate that it has the lowest RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), MSE (Mean Square Error) MAE(Mean Absolute Error) and their values are 1.2, 1.44 and 0.77 respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Improved K-Type Seven-Level Converter Topology for Direct Grid Integration of Solar Photovoltaic Plant Multi-Period Optimization of Hybrid Energy Systems Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming Technical Comparison between Lead-acid and Lithium-ion Batteries Used in Microgrid UPS System A framework for Assessing the Reliability of Grid Networks by Modelling the Cyber-Physical Interdependencies of Dynamic Line Rating Components Operation of Unified Power Quality Conditioner with Photovoltaic Arrays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1