基于方面的意见挖掘在印度尼西亚的代码混合餐厅评论

Andi Suciati, I. Budi
{"title":"基于方面的意见挖掘在印度尼西亚的代码混合餐厅评论","authors":"Andi Suciati, I. Budi","doi":"10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of opinion mining is to extract the sentiment, emotions, or judgement of reviews and classified it. These reviews are very important because they can affect the decision-making from a person. In this paper, we conducted an aspect-based opinion mining research using customer reviews of restaurants in Indonesia and we focused into analyzing the code-mixed dataset. The evaluation conducted by making four scenarios namely removing stopwords without stemming, without removing stopwords but with stemming, without removing stopwords and stemming, and preprocessing with removing stopwords and stemming. We compared five algorithms which are Random Forest (RF), Multinomial Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Extra Tree classifier (ET). The models were evaluated by using 10 folds cross validation, and the results show that all aspects achieved highest scores with different algorithms. LR achieved highest score for food (81.76%) and ambience (77.29%) aspects while the highest score for price (78.71%) and service (85.07%) aspects were obtained by DT.","PeriodicalId":208066,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspect-based Opinion Mining for Code-Mixed Restaurant Reviews in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Andi Suciati, I. Budi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of opinion mining is to extract the sentiment, emotions, or judgement of reviews and classified it. These reviews are very important because they can affect the decision-making from a person. In this paper, we conducted an aspect-based opinion mining research using customer reviews of restaurants in Indonesia and we focused into analyzing the code-mixed dataset. The evaluation conducted by making four scenarios namely removing stopwords without stemming, without removing stopwords but with stemming, without removing stopwords and stemming, and preprocessing with removing stopwords and stemming. We compared five algorithms which are Random Forest (RF), Multinomial Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Extra Tree classifier (ET). The models were evaluated by using 10 folds cross validation, and the results show that all aspects achieved highest scores with different algorithms. LR achieved highest score for food (81.76%) and ambience (77.29%) aspects while the highest score for price (78.71%) and service (85.07%) aspects were obtained by DT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

意见挖掘的目标是提取评论的情绪、情感或判断并对其进行分类。这些评估非常重要,因为它们会影响一个人的决策。在本文中,我们使用印度尼西亚餐馆的顾客评论进行了基于方面的意见挖掘研究,并重点分析了代码混合数据集。通过设置不提取停词、不提取停词但提取词干、不提取停词并提取词干、提取停词并提取预处理四种场景进行评价。我们比较了随机森林(RF)、多项朴素贝叶斯(NB)、逻辑回归(LR)、决策树(DT)和额外树分类器(ET)这五种算法。采用10倍交叉验证对模型进行评价,结果表明,不同算法下,模型各方面得分最高。LR在食物(81.76%)和环境(77.29%)方面得分最高,DT在价格(78.71%)和服务(85.07%)方面得分最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspect-based Opinion Mining for Code-Mixed Restaurant Reviews in Indonesia
The goal of opinion mining is to extract the sentiment, emotions, or judgement of reviews and classified it. These reviews are very important because they can affect the decision-making from a person. In this paper, we conducted an aspect-based opinion mining research using customer reviews of restaurants in Indonesia and we focused into analyzing the code-mixed dataset. The evaluation conducted by making four scenarios namely removing stopwords without stemming, without removing stopwords but with stemming, without removing stopwords and stemming, and preprocessing with removing stopwords and stemming. We compared five algorithms which are Random Forest (RF), Multinomial Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Extra Tree classifier (ET). The models were evaluated by using 10 folds cross validation, and the results show that all aspects achieved highest scores with different algorithms. LR achieved highest score for food (81.76%) and ambience (77.29%) aspects while the highest score for price (78.71%) and service (85.07%) aspects were obtained by DT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A General Procedure for Improving Language Models in Low-Resource Speech Recognition Automated Prediction of Item Difficulty in Reading Comprehension Using Long Short-Term Memory An Measurement Method of Ancient Poetry Difficulty for Adaptive Testing How to Answer Comparison Questions An Enhancement of Malay Social Media Text Normalization for Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1