{"title":"面向人-聊天机器人交互的综合修复框架:以措辞改写为例","authors":"Alina Asisof","doi":"10.1145/3514197.3549641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.","PeriodicalId":149593,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a comprehensive repair framework for human-chatbot interaction: the case of rephrasing\",\"authors\":\"Alina Asisof\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3514197.3549641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514197.3549641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514197.3549641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards a comprehensive repair framework for human-chatbot interaction: the case of rephrasing
Chatbots are becoming a regular part of service offerings. However, failures in human-chatbot interactions are common and mitigating them with appropriate strategies is an integral part of the dialogue. For instance, chatbots can be designed to prompt a rephrase, although, due to the complexity of user reactions, this is not always successful. Research has called for taxonomies to categorize user reactions to compute meaningful responses that encourage dialogue continuation. We suggest a framework of strategies based on prior research and test its validity, focusing on how users rephrase across dialogue turns. We find that users rephrase problems formally (49%), by changing the number of words, altering syntax, or using synonyms and to a lesser extent by altering informational value (25%). We suggest training chatbots along this behavior and designing better prompts that guide users' next actions.