动态安全评价的建模框架

S. Tolo, R. Yan, S. Dunnett, J. Andrews
{"title":"动态安全评价的建模框架","authors":"S. Tolo, R. Yan, S. Dunnett, J. Andrews","doi":"10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_161-cd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of resilience is progressively making its way into the design, operation and management practice of complex engineering systems. The core of such trend lies with the integration of failure mechanisms in the modelling of systems since the very design phase, focusing on the ability to efficiently absorb and rapidly respond to threats rather than merely avoid them. This is expected to overcome the limitations of traditional design-against-failure approaches, whose efficiency is often undermined by the strong uncertainty associated with rare or hardly predictable hazards. However, the potential advantages such a theoretical shift delivers have not yet been matched by the availability of adequate numerical tools and methodologies targeting the challenges associated with resilience analyses. The current literature and engineering practice lack of a widely agreed upon methodology for the assessment of systems resilience, or even for the definition of its metrics. This study proposes a novel approach for the estimation of the dynamic response of complex systems to safety-threatening perturbations, aiming at providing a solid base for the evaluation of system resilience. The framework proposed relies on the use of Petri nets to capture both the physics of the processes entailed by the system operation and its interaction with the technological installation. The framework is applied to a case-study focusing on the response of a CANDU nuclear reactor to cyber incidents hindering the correct operation of the reactor control system and hence resulting in a loss of regulation threatening the structural integrity of the nuclear fuel.","PeriodicalId":187633,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modelling Framework for Dynamic Safety Assessment\",\"authors\":\"S. Tolo, R. Yan, S. Dunnett, J. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_161-cd\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of resilience is progressively making its way into the design, operation and management practice of complex engineering systems. The core of such trend lies with the integration of failure mechanisms in the modelling of systems since the very design phase, focusing on the ability to efficiently absorb and rapidly respond to threats rather than merely avoid them. This is expected to overcome the limitations of traditional design-against-failure approaches, whose efficiency is often undermined by the strong uncertainty associated with rare or hardly predictable hazards. However, the potential advantages such a theoretical shift delivers have not yet been matched by the availability of adequate numerical tools and methodologies targeting the challenges associated with resilience analyses. The current literature and engineering practice lack of a widely agreed upon methodology for the assessment of systems resilience, or even for the definition of its metrics. This study proposes a novel approach for the estimation of the dynamic response of complex systems to safety-threatening perturbations, aiming at providing a solid base for the evaluation of system resilience. The framework proposed relies on the use of Petri nets to capture both the physics of the processes entailed by the system operation and its interaction with the technological installation. The framework is applied to a case-study focusing on the response of a CANDU nuclear reactor to cyber incidents hindering the correct operation of the reactor control system and hence resulting in a loss of regulation threatening the structural integrity of the nuclear fuel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_161-cd\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_161-cd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弹性的概念正逐渐进入复杂工程系统的设计、运行和管理实践。这种趋势的核心在于从设计阶段开始就将失效机制集成到系统建模中,重点关注有效吸收和快速响应威胁的能力,而不仅仅是避免威胁。这有望克服传统的针对故障的设计方法的局限性,这种方法的效率经常被与罕见或难以预测的危险相关的强烈不确定性所破坏。然而,这种理论转变带来的潜在优势尚未与针对弹性分析相关挑战的适当数值工具和方法的可用性相匹配。目前的文献和工程实践缺乏广泛同意的评估系统弹性的方法,甚至缺乏对其度量的定义。本研究提出了一种新的方法来估计复杂系统对安全威胁摄动的动态响应,旨在为系统弹性评估提供坚实的基础。提出的框架依赖于使用Petri网来捕捉系统操作所涉及的过程的物理性质及其与技术装置的相互作用。该框架应用于一个案例研究,重点是CANDU核反应堆对网络事件的响应,这些事件阻碍了反应堆控制系统的正确运行,从而导致监管丧失,威胁到核燃料的结构完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Modelling Framework for Dynamic Safety Assessment
The concept of resilience is progressively making its way into the design, operation and management practice of complex engineering systems. The core of such trend lies with the integration of failure mechanisms in the modelling of systems since the very design phase, focusing on the ability to efficiently absorb and rapidly respond to threats rather than merely avoid them. This is expected to overcome the limitations of traditional design-against-failure approaches, whose efficiency is often undermined by the strong uncertainty associated with rare or hardly predictable hazards. However, the potential advantages such a theoretical shift delivers have not yet been matched by the availability of adequate numerical tools and methodologies targeting the challenges associated with resilience analyses. The current literature and engineering practice lack of a widely agreed upon methodology for the assessment of systems resilience, or even for the definition of its metrics. This study proposes a novel approach for the estimation of the dynamic response of complex systems to safety-threatening perturbations, aiming at providing a solid base for the evaluation of system resilience. The framework proposed relies on the use of Petri nets to capture both the physics of the processes entailed by the system operation and its interaction with the technological installation. The framework is applied to a case-study focusing on the response of a CANDU nuclear reactor to cyber incidents hindering the correct operation of the reactor control system and hence resulting in a loss of regulation threatening the structural integrity of the nuclear fuel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Use Prescriptive Maintenance to Construct Robust Master Production Schedules Robust Sensor Fault Detection for Linear Parameter-Varying Systems using Interval Observer Knowledge-Based Approach for System Level Electromagnetic Safety Analysis A State-of-the-Art Review on IC EMC Reliability Empirical Analysis of Ship Anchor Drag Incidents for Cable Burial Risk Assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1