在外科训练中使用虚拟现实模拟:对预测有效性和目前在外科课程中使用的系统回顾

A. Feeley, I. Feeley, K. Merghani, E. Sheehan
{"title":"在外科训练中使用虚拟现实模拟:对预测有效性和目前在外科课程中使用的系统回顾","authors":"A. Feeley, I. Feeley, K. Merghani, E. Sheehan","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Simulated surgical learning is an evolving training modality for surgical trainees. Its use in transferring simulation-based skills to the operating room is an integral aspect of its use as a pedagogical tool for surgical trainees in an era of reduced working hours and fewer intra-operative opportunities. These systems may allow trainees to upskill in simulated scenarios leading to improved skillsets and patient safety. The aim of this review was to evaluate if acquisition of surgical skills developed in simulated procedures results in improved intra-operative performance and whether this can be integrated into current surgical curricula. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID Medline and CINAHL. Articles included were based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess each article’s authenticity, applicability and quality of results. Results: Twenty-six studies were reviewed in full and included in this review according to PRISMA guidelines. Thematic analysis yielded four main themes: predictive validity, surgical curriculum, timing of training, clinical outcomes. All studies demonstrated validity. Conclusion: A heterogeneous group of studies demonstrated mixed findings in the predictive validity of virtual reality learning. However, adaptation into surgical curricula in conjunction with other forms of surgical education yielded positive results, with predictive validity demonstrated in surgical trainees. Further research is required to elicit optimal training stages and use of simulation in development of non-technical skills.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of virtual reality simulation in surgical training: a systematic review on predictive validity and current use in surgical curricula\",\"authors\":\"A. Feeley, I. Feeley, K. Merghani, E. Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Simulated surgical learning is an evolving training modality for surgical trainees. Its use in transferring simulation-based skills to the operating room is an integral aspect of its use as a pedagogical tool for surgical trainees in an era of reduced working hours and fewer intra-operative opportunities. These systems may allow trainees to upskill in simulated scenarios leading to improved skillsets and patient safety. The aim of this review was to evaluate if acquisition of surgical skills developed in simulated procedures results in improved intra-operative performance and whether this can be integrated into current surgical curricula. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID Medline and CINAHL. Articles included were based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess each article’s authenticity, applicability and quality of results. Results: Twenty-six studies were reviewed in full and included in this review according to PRISMA guidelines. Thematic analysis yielded four main themes: predictive validity, surgical curriculum, timing of training, clinical outcomes. All studies demonstrated validity. Conclusion: A heterogeneous group of studies demonstrated mixed findings in the predictive validity of virtual reality learning. However, adaptation into surgical curricula in conjunction with other forms of surgical education yielded positive results, with predictive validity demonstrated in surgical trainees. Further research is required to elicit optimal training stages and use of simulation in development of non-technical skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:模拟手术学习是一种不断发展的外科培训方式。在工作时间缩短和术中机会减少的时代,它作为外科培训生的教学工具,在将基于模拟的技能转移到手术室中是一个不可或缺的方面。这些系统可以让受训者在模拟场景中提高技能,从而改善技能组合和患者安全。本综述的目的是评估在模拟手术中获得的手术技能是否能提高术中表现,以及是否可以将其纳入当前的外科课程。方法:系统检索PubMed、OVID Medline和CINAHL。纳入的文章基于特定的纳入和排除标准。使用关键评估工具评估每篇文章的真实性、适用性和结果质量。结果:26项研究根据PRISMA指南被完整地回顾并纳入本综述。专题分析产生了四个主要主题:预测有效性,手术课程,培训时间,临床结果。所有的研究都证明了有效性。结论:一组不同的研究表明,虚拟现实学习的预测有效性有不同的发现。然而,与其他形式的外科教育相结合的外科课程适应产生了积极的结果,在外科受训者中证明了预测有效性。需要进一步的研究来引出最佳的训练阶段和在非技术技能的发展中使用模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of virtual reality simulation in surgical training: a systematic review on predictive validity and current use in surgical curricula
Background: Simulated surgical learning is an evolving training modality for surgical trainees. Its use in transferring simulation-based skills to the operating room is an integral aspect of its use as a pedagogical tool for surgical trainees in an era of reduced working hours and fewer intra-operative opportunities. These systems may allow trainees to upskill in simulated scenarios leading to improved skillsets and patient safety. The aim of this review was to evaluate if acquisition of surgical skills developed in simulated procedures results in improved intra-operative performance and whether this can be integrated into current surgical curricula. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, OVID Medline and CINAHL. Articles included were based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critical appraisal tools were used to assess each article’s authenticity, applicability and quality of results. Results: Twenty-six studies were reviewed in full and included in this review according to PRISMA guidelines. Thematic analysis yielded four main themes: predictive validity, surgical curriculum, timing of training, clinical outcomes. All studies demonstrated validity. Conclusion: A heterogeneous group of studies demonstrated mixed findings in the predictive validity of virtual reality learning. However, adaptation into surgical curricula in conjunction with other forms of surgical education yielded positive results, with predictive validity demonstrated in surgical trainees. Further research is required to elicit optimal training stages and use of simulation in development of non-technical skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1