《世界宗教的经济伦理学》是韦伯最后的(积极的)反批判

Ferenc Takó
{"title":"《世界宗教的经济伦理学》是韦伯最后的(积极的)反批判","authors":"Ferenc Takó","doi":"10.1353/max.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 1960, Bendix claimed that the studies of the Economic Ethics of the World Religions (EEWR) serve as verification of the central thesis of The Protestant Ethic (PE). In 1975, Tenbruck argued that the PE and the EEWR 'do not belong together as hypothesis and control evidence' (: 328). In the present paper I will analyse the relationship between the PE and the EEWR in the context of Weber's methodological writings on history, particularly of his Critical Studies, using an argument of Schluchter (2014), and certain elements of the Protestant ethic debate. I will argue that the EEWR can be regarded as a 'test' of the Protestant ethic thesis in the sense that it can be read as Weber's monumental (positively) last 'anti-critique' responding to the criticism of the PE, and that this does not weaken but adds to its significance.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economic Ethics of the World Religions as Weber's (positively) last anti-critique\",\"authors\":\"Ferenc Takó\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/max.2022.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 1960, Bendix claimed that the studies of the Economic Ethics of the World Religions (EEWR) serve as verification of the central thesis of The Protestant Ethic (PE). In 1975, Tenbruck argued that the PE and the EEWR 'do not belong together as hypothesis and control evidence' (: 328). In the present paper I will analyse the relationship between the PE and the EEWR in the context of Weber's methodological writings on history, particularly of his Critical Studies, using an argument of Schluchter (2014), and certain elements of the Protestant ethic debate. I will argue that the EEWR can be regarded as a 'test' of the Protestant ethic thesis in the sense that it can be read as Weber's monumental (positively) last 'anti-critique' responding to the criticism of the PE, and that this does not weaken but adds to its significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2022.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本迪克斯在1960年提出,世界宗教经济伦理研究是对《新教伦理论》中心论题的验证。1975年,Tenbruck认为PE和EEWR“不属于假设和控制证据”(:328)。在本文中,我将使用Schluchter(2014)的论点和新教伦理辩论的某些元素,在韦伯关于历史的方法论著作(特别是他的批判研究)的背景下,分析PE和EEWR之间的关系。我将论证,《欧洲经济环境研究报告》可以被视为新教伦理论题的一个“测试”,因为它可以被解读为韦伯对《经济学》批判的不朽的(积极的)最后的“反批判”回应,而且这不会削弱而是增加了它的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Economic Ethics of the World Religions as Weber's (positively) last anti-critique
Abstract:In 1960, Bendix claimed that the studies of the Economic Ethics of the World Religions (EEWR) serve as verification of the central thesis of The Protestant Ethic (PE). In 1975, Tenbruck argued that the PE and the EEWR 'do not belong together as hypothesis and control evidence' (: 328). In the present paper I will analyse the relationship between the PE and the EEWR in the context of Weber's methodological writings on history, particularly of his Critical Studies, using an argument of Schluchter (2014), and certain elements of the Protestant ethic debate. I will argue that the EEWR can be regarded as a 'test' of the Protestant ethic thesis in the sense that it can be read as Weber's monumental (positively) last 'anti-critique' responding to the criticism of the PE, and that this does not weaken but adds to its significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1