组合等价性检验中布尔可满足性检验和bdd的集成

Aarti Gupta, P. Ashar
{"title":"组合等价性检验中布尔可满足性检验和bdd的集成","authors":"Aarti Gupta, P. Ashar","doi":"10.1109/ICVD.1998.646606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been much interest in techniques which combine the advantages of function-based methods, such as BDDs, with structure-based methods, such as ATPG, for verifying the equivalence of combinational circuits. However, most existing efforts have focused on exploiting circuit similarity through use of learning and/or ATPG-based methods rather than on making the integration between BDDs and ATPG techniques efficient. This paper presents a new technique, where the focus is on improving the equivalence check itself, thereby making it more robust in the absence of circuit similarity. It is based on tight integration of a Boolean Satisfiability Checker with BDDs, whereby BDDs are effectively used to reduce both the problem size and the number of backtracks for the satisfiability problem. This methodology does not preclude exploitation of circuit similarity, when it exists, since the improved check can be easily incorporated as the inner loop of the well-known iterative framework involving search and replacement of internally equivalent nodes. We demonstrate the significance of our contributions with practical results on the ISCAS benchmark circuits.","PeriodicalId":139023,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eleventh International Conference on VLSI Design","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a Boolean satisfiability checker and BDDs for combinational equivalence checking\",\"authors\":\"Aarti Gupta, P. Ashar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICVD.1998.646606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been much interest in techniques which combine the advantages of function-based methods, such as BDDs, with structure-based methods, such as ATPG, for verifying the equivalence of combinational circuits. However, most existing efforts have focused on exploiting circuit similarity through use of learning and/or ATPG-based methods rather than on making the integration between BDDs and ATPG techniques efficient. This paper presents a new technique, where the focus is on improving the equivalence check itself, thereby making it more robust in the absence of circuit similarity. It is based on tight integration of a Boolean Satisfiability Checker with BDDs, whereby BDDs are effectively used to reduce both the problem size and the number of backtracks for the satisfiability problem. This methodology does not preclude exploitation of circuit similarity, when it exists, since the improved check can be easily incorporated as the inner loop of the well-known iterative framework involving search and replacement of internally equivalent nodes. We demonstrate the significance of our contributions with practical results on the ISCAS benchmark circuits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":139023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Eleventh International Conference on VLSI Design\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Eleventh International Conference on VLSI Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVD.1998.646606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eleventh International Conference on VLSI Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVD.1998.646606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

将基于功能的方法(如bdd)的优点与基于结构的方法(如ATPG)相结合,用于验证组合电路的等效性的技术引起了人们的极大兴趣。然而,大多数现有的努力都集中在通过使用学习和/或基于ATPG的方法来开发电路相似性上,而不是在bdd和ATPG技术之间进行有效的集成。本文提出了一种新技术,其重点是改进等效性检查本身,从而使其在没有电路相似性的情况下更具鲁棒性。它基于布尔可满足性检查器与bdd的紧密集成,因此bdd可以有效地用于减少可满足性问题的问题大小和回溯数量。这种方法并不排除利用电路相似性,当它存在时,因为改进的检查可以很容易地合并为众所周知的迭代框架的内环,涉及内部等效节点的搜索和替换。我们通过在ISCAS基准电路上的实际结果证明了我们的贡献的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating a Boolean satisfiability checker and BDDs for combinational equivalence checking
There has been much interest in techniques which combine the advantages of function-based methods, such as BDDs, with structure-based methods, such as ATPG, for verifying the equivalence of combinational circuits. However, most existing efforts have focused on exploiting circuit similarity through use of learning and/or ATPG-based methods rather than on making the integration between BDDs and ATPG techniques efficient. This paper presents a new technique, where the focus is on improving the equivalence check itself, thereby making it more robust in the absence of circuit similarity. It is based on tight integration of a Boolean Satisfiability Checker with BDDs, whereby BDDs are effectively used to reduce both the problem size and the number of backtracks for the satisfiability problem. This methodology does not preclude exploitation of circuit similarity, when it exists, since the improved check can be easily incorporated as the inner loop of the well-known iterative framework involving search and replacement of internally equivalent nodes. We demonstrate the significance of our contributions with practical results on the ISCAS benchmark circuits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case analysis of system partitioning and its relationship to high-level synthesis tasks Arbitrary precision arithmetic-SIMD style Partial reset methodologies for improving random-pattern testability and BIST of sequential circuits Top-down approach to technology migration for full-custom mask layouts Hybrid testing schemes based on mutual and signature testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1