2006年以来农产品价格上涨:美国期货市场效率的实证研究

Velmurugan Palaniappan Shanmugam, P. Armah
{"title":"2006年以来农产品价格上涨:美国期货市场效率的实证研究","authors":"Velmurugan Palaniappan Shanmugam, P. Armah","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2975288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well established and efficient agricultural commodity futures markets, are expected to perform the role of price discovery and risk management more effectively. The results of the Johansen’s cointegration tests have shown that the spot and futures markets for the 12 agricultural commodities are cointegrated (during the main and sub-periods of study). This suggests that the markets are efficient and the agriculture commodity futures exchanges (CBOT, KCBT, CME, & ICE) provide efficient hedge against price risks emerging in respective commodities. The Granger causality test results show bi-directional flow of information in majority of the commodities during the main as well as the two sub-periods. This shows both the spot and future markets are equally responsible for the price discovery process. However, examination of the F-statistics indicates a strong flow of information from the futures markets to spot markets than the reverse. The unidirectional causal relationships exhibited by commodities such as wheat, soybean, lean hogs and cocoa, imply that the futures markets help discover prices in the spot markets and that the markets are efficient. The causal relationship results suggest that information flow from futures markets to spot markets appears to have increased over the years. This apparent increase in information flows could be attributed to the increase in the relative importance of electronic trading of futures contracts in recent years, which results in more transparent and widely accessible prices. The results meet our three criteria of market efficiency and suggest that there is no need for changes in the existing regulations of the agricultural futures market.","PeriodicalId":374935,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Global Markets (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agricultural Commodity Price Hikes Since 2006: Empirical Study on Efficiency of U.S. Futures Market\",\"authors\":\"Velmurugan Palaniappan Shanmugam, P. Armah\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2975288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Well established and efficient agricultural commodity futures markets, are expected to perform the role of price discovery and risk management more effectively. The results of the Johansen’s cointegration tests have shown that the spot and futures markets for the 12 agricultural commodities are cointegrated (during the main and sub-periods of study). This suggests that the markets are efficient and the agriculture commodity futures exchanges (CBOT, KCBT, CME, & ICE) provide efficient hedge against price risks emerging in respective commodities. The Granger causality test results show bi-directional flow of information in majority of the commodities during the main as well as the two sub-periods. This shows both the spot and future markets are equally responsible for the price discovery process. However, examination of the F-statistics indicates a strong flow of information from the futures markets to spot markets than the reverse. The unidirectional causal relationships exhibited by commodities such as wheat, soybean, lean hogs and cocoa, imply that the futures markets help discover prices in the spot markets and that the markets are efficient. The causal relationship results suggest that information flow from futures markets to spot markets appears to have increased over the years. This apparent increase in information flows could be attributed to the increase in the relative importance of electronic trading of futures contracts in recent years, which results in more transparent and widely accessible prices. The results meet our three criteria of market efficiency and suggest that there is no need for changes in the existing regulations of the agricultural futures market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Global Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Global Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Global Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

完善和高效的农产品期货市场有望更有效地发挥价格发现和风险管理的作用。约翰森协整检验的结果表明,12种农产品的现货和期货市场是协整的(在研究的主要时期和分时期)。这表明市场是有效的,农产品期货交易所(CBOT, KCBT, CME和ICE)提供了有效的对冲各自商品出现的价格风险。格兰杰因果检验结果表明,在主周期和两个子周期内,大多数商品的信息都是双向流动的。这表明现货市场和期货市场对价格发现过程负有同等责任。然而,对f统计数据的检查表明,从期货市场到现货市场的信息流比相反的信息流强。小麦、大豆、瘦肉猪和可可等大宗商品所表现出的单向因果关系意味着,期货市场有助于发现现货市场的价格,而且市场是有效的。因果关系结果表明,从期货市场到现货市场的信息流多年来似乎有所增加。信息流的明显增加可归因于近年来期货合约电子交易的相对重要性的增加,这导致了更透明和更广泛的价格。结果符合我们的市场效率的三个标准,并表明没有必要改变现有的农业期货市场的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agricultural Commodity Price Hikes Since 2006: Empirical Study on Efficiency of U.S. Futures Market
Well established and efficient agricultural commodity futures markets, are expected to perform the role of price discovery and risk management more effectively. The results of the Johansen’s cointegration tests have shown that the spot and futures markets for the 12 agricultural commodities are cointegrated (during the main and sub-periods of study). This suggests that the markets are efficient and the agriculture commodity futures exchanges (CBOT, KCBT, CME, & ICE) provide efficient hedge against price risks emerging in respective commodities. The Granger causality test results show bi-directional flow of information in majority of the commodities during the main as well as the two sub-periods. This shows both the spot and future markets are equally responsible for the price discovery process. However, examination of the F-statistics indicates a strong flow of information from the futures markets to spot markets than the reverse. The unidirectional causal relationships exhibited by commodities such as wheat, soybean, lean hogs and cocoa, imply that the futures markets help discover prices in the spot markets and that the markets are efficient. The causal relationship results suggest that information flow from futures markets to spot markets appears to have increased over the years. This apparent increase in information flows could be attributed to the increase in the relative importance of electronic trading of futures contracts in recent years, which results in more transparent and widely accessible prices. The results meet our three criteria of market efficiency and suggest that there is no need for changes in the existing regulations of the agricultural futures market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Price of Cheeky Contracting What Have We Learned About Political Participation Changing a Financial Centre’s Competitiveness? A Science of Markets: The Moral Dimension of the Invisible Hand The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on the Efficiency and Performance of Latin American Stock Markets Sustainable Global Supply Chains at Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1